Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-22-2013, 01:29 AM | #1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Wanganui
Posts: 697
|
Inscription in Palmyra from 135CE
I've been reading some Arthur Voobus, and in a footnote he writes.
Quote:
|
|
06-22-2013, 06:36 AM | #2 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
Quote:
All the best, Roger Pearse |
||
06-22-2013, 10:33 AM | #3 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
Quote:
|
|||
06-22-2013, 12:10 PM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
Could we have some links to the "Christian apologetic web pages" in question, please? (frustration)
Perfectly willing to look stuff up, but, come on guys, give me something to work with!!! |
06-22-2013, 01:06 PM | #5 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Arthut Voobius had his name corrupted by wikipedia (those diacritical marks.) His period of specialty was more the 5th century.
Melchior de Vogue was one of those 19th century polymath orientalists. I would think that a verified Christian inscription dated to 135 CE would be better known, but I don't see any mention of it on the usual sources. |
06-22-2013, 01:28 PM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
It looks like several pages owned by Syriac Orthodox Christians that draw from a common source:
Christian Mysteries In my opinion, websites that promote a particular kind of religious POV or history are essentially apologetic. On the other hand, I'm not getting Google hits on this inscription dated 135 CE in any academic books or articles except for Voobus. Usually Voobus is cited for his work on 5th century inscriptions. AD 135 is a pretty early date for a Christian tomb inscription in Palmyra. Looking through the Nabatean tomb inscriptions in Enno Littman's Semitic Inscriptions (1914), I can only find maybe one that was dated in some way. They usually follow the pattern: "This tomb was built by XX for YY his son/daughter/wife." Considering the strong Arab influence on Palmyra I would expect the same in their tomb inscriptions. |
06-22-2013, 02:40 PM | #7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
Quote:
The next thing to do, of course, is access that text. I've emailed him to see if he has access to it. But where do we get the half-reference in the OP from? All the best, Roger Pearse |
|
06-22-2013, 03:28 PM | #8 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
Correct.
It seems Arthur Vööbus [1948] was citing Melchior de Vogue [1868] but it is not clear to me whether the date of AD 135 is Voobus' own or goes back to Vogue. Apparently, it is not always easy to read the date so opinions vary. Let us know what you find out. I was searching the internet. Quote:
|
||
06-22-2013, 04:21 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Wanganui
Posts: 697
|
No I don't unfortunately. That is the full footnote in the book DCHindley mentions.
|
06-22-2013, 09:17 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Wanganui
Posts: 697
|
Quote:
jewish Christian taunt. The reference I gave is a footnote to the above asterix. He then proceeds to further discussion of the Diatessaron. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|