Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
08-07-2013, 10:57 PM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Is It Really True The Verb eperchomai Is 'Never Used in Relation to Sexual Activity'?
“not the slightest evidence that either of the verbs involved has ever been used in relation to sexual activity or even more broadly in connection with the conception of a child” [Nolland, Luke 1-9:20, 54)
But Herodotus tells the story of the Spartan king who need a baby: the wife who had come in afterwards bore this Cleomenes of whom we spoke. χρόνου δὲ οὐ πολλοῦ διελθόντος ἡ ἐσύστερον ἐπελθοῦσα γυνὴ τίκτει τὸν δὴ Κλεομένεα τοῦτον. [Hdt. 5.41] |
08-07-2013, 11:40 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Here is an example where a wife comes in and it is not sexual in nature:
ὁ γοῦν Πιττακὸς ἐκεῖνος, οὗ μέγα μὲν ἀνδρείας μέγα δὲ σοφίας καὶ δικαιοσύνης κλέος, εἱστία ξένους: ἐπελθοῦσα δ᾽ ἡ γυνὴ μετ᾽ ὀργῆς ἀνέτρεψε τὴν τράπεζαν When the renowned Pittacus, who got him so great a name for his fortitude, wisdom, and justice, was entertaining his friends at a noble banquet, and his spouse in an angry humor came and overturned the table; his guests being extremely disturbed at it [Plut. De Tranq. 11] |
08-07-2013, 11:48 PM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
I have another example.
|
08-07-2013, 11:49 PM | #4 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
The temporal phrase (χρόνου δὲ οὐ πολλοῦ διελθόντος ἡ ἐσύστερον ~ "not much time passing hereafter") seems to qualify the participle (ἐπελθοῦσα ~ "having come forward"... after the first wife's inability), which in turn qualifies the (new) wife, who is able to and did produce the desired child. I don't see that ἐπελθοῦσα carries in itself any sexual activity. It seems to be related to number two's coming along. You could suggest that there is a sexual implication in the statement (something had to happen to get the result), but I'm not seeing that it is derived from the participle itself. |
|
08-08-2013, 12:43 AM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Yes she's the 'come in afterwards wife' and the 'come in afterwards woman' as we see in what follows:
ἔχουσαν δὲ αὐτὴν ἀληθεῖ λόγῳ οἱ τῆς ἐπελθούσης γυναικὸς οἰκήιοι πυθόμενοι ὤχλεον |
08-08-2013, 01:02 AM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Looking at all the shades of meaning I wonder if ἐπέρχομαι was ever used in the sense of 'rape'
|
08-08-2013, 01:26 AM | #7 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
The Moody Handbook of Theology (or via: amazon.co.uk) By Paul P Enns
Quote:
|
|
08-08-2013, 05:05 AM | #9 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Do not some more general questions need to be asked first? For example, what were the beliefs about where babies come from and what were the possibilities?
For example a google search found a statement that Aristotle believed wind direction determines the sex of a baby. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=d...%20boy&f=false As the Holy Spirit and wind are I believe related (rauch).... are we looking at a belief in a special holy wind? |
08-08-2013, 06:20 AM | #10 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|