FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Philosophy & Religious Studies > History of Abrahamic Religions & Related Texts
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 01:23 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-07-2013, 10:57 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default Is It Really True The Verb eperchomai Is 'Never Used in Relation to Sexual Activity'?

“not the slightest evidence that either of the verbs involved has ever been used in relation to sexual activity or even more broadly in connection with the conception of a child” [Nolland, Luke 1-9:20, 54)

But Herodotus tells the story of the Spartan king who need a baby:

the wife who had come in afterwards bore this Cleomenes of whom we spoke.

χρόνου δὲ οὐ πολλοῦ διελθόντος ἡ ἐσύστερον ἐπελθοῦσα γυνὴ τίκτει τὸν δὴ Κλεομένεα τοῦτον. [Hdt. 5.41]
stephan huller is offline  
Old 08-07-2013, 11:40 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Here is an example where a wife comes in and it is not sexual in nature:

ὁ γοῦν Πιττακὸς ἐκεῖνος, οὗ μέγα μὲν ἀνδρείας μέγα δὲ σοφίας καὶ δικαιοσύνης κλέος, εἱστία ξένους: ἐπελθοῦσα δ᾽ ἡ γυνὴ μετ᾽ ὀργῆς ἀνέτρεψε τὴν τράπεζαν

When the renowned Pittacus, who got him so great a name for his fortitude, wisdom, and justice, was entertaining his friends at a noble banquet, and his spouse in an angry humor came and overturned the table; his guests being extremely disturbed at it [Plut. De Tranq. 11]
stephan huller is offline  
Old 08-07-2013, 11:48 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

I have another example.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 08-07-2013, 11:49 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
“not the slightest evidence that either of the verbs involved has ever been used in relation to sexual activity or even more broadly in connection with the conception of a child” [Nolland, Luke 1-9:20, 54)

But Herodotus tells the story of the Spartan king who need a baby:

the wife who had come in afterwards bore this Cleomenes of whom we spoke.

χρόνου δὲ οὐ πολλοῦ διελθόντος ἡ ἐσύστερον ἐπελθοῦσα γυνὴ τίκτει τὸν δὴ Κλεομένεα τοῦτον. [Hdt. 5.41]
I think the rest of the context needs to be considered. Yes, he needed a baby, but his first wife didn't produce the goods, so he ended up with two wives and the cited text is dealing with that second wife.

The temporal phrase (χρόνου δὲ οὐ πολλοῦ διελθόντος ἡ ἐσύστερον ~ "not much time passing hereafter") seems to qualify the participle (ἐπελθοῦσα ~ "having come forward"... after the first wife's inability), which in turn qualifies the (new) wife, who is able to and did produce the desired child.

I don't see that ἐπελθοῦσα carries in itself any sexual activity. It seems to be related to number two's coming along. You could suggest that there is a sexual implication in the statement (something had to happen to get the result), but I'm not seeing that it is derived from the participle itself.
spin is offline  
Old 08-08-2013, 12:43 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Yes she's the 'come in afterwards wife' and the 'come in afterwards woman' as we see in what follows:

ἔχουσαν δὲ αὐτὴν ἀληθεῖ λόγῳ οἱ τῆς ἐπελθούσης γυναικὸς οἰκήιοι πυθόμενοι ὤχλεον
stephan huller is offline  
Old 08-08-2013, 01:02 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Looking at all the shades of meaning I wonder if ἐπέρχομαι was ever used in the sense of 'rape'
stephan huller is offline  
Old 08-08-2013, 01:26 AM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

The Moody Handbook of Theology (or via: amazon.co.uk) By Paul P Enns

Quote:
Both Matthew and Luke emphasize the ministry of the Holy Spirit in in causing Mary's conception Mathew 1:20 stresses, "the child who has been conceived in her is of [Gr. ek the Holy Spirit," stressing origin. The origin of Jesus' birth was not through Joseph but through the agency of the Holy Spirit. Luke 1:35 uses the terms "come upon" and "overshadow" to describe the Holy Spirit's ministry with regard to Mary in causing the conception. The same term "come upon" (Gk. eperchomai) is used of the Holy Spirit's coming upon the apostles at Pentacost (Acts 1:8). It is unlikely the word is intended as a euphemism for sexual intercourse.
Toto is offline  
Old 08-08-2013, 01:31 AM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Although - Perseus

"b. freq. in hostile sense, go or come against, attack"
Toto is offline  
Old 08-08-2013, 05:05 AM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Do not some more general questions need to be asked first? For example, what were the beliefs about where babies come from and what were the possibilities?

For example a google search found a statement that Aristotle believed wind direction determines the sex of a baby.

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=d...%20boy&f=false

As the Holy Spirit and wind are I believe related (rauch).... are we looking at a belief in a special holy wind?
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 08-08-2013, 06:20 AM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Although - Perseus

"b. freq. in hostile sense, go or come against, attack"
You would have contextual clues for this hostile sense, such as the subject being a soldier or was seeking vengeance or the like.
spin is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:00 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.