Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-07-2003, 09:05 PM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: a place where i can list whatever location i want
Posts: 4,871
|
I'm going to assume you mean "cause."
The biggest problem with your question is that "atheist" (literally, "non-believer in god[s]") is not really a valid way of defining and describing a group of people, just as any other negative qualifier is. I don't think you'd ask about the beliefs of "non-Republicans" or "non-grunge fans" and expect a definitive answer on the political persuasion or taste in music of those who fall under those categories. Likewise, it's nonsensical to ask what metaphysical beliefs a group has based solely on their shared lack of belief in a diety. Or, more simply, as pz put it, "atheists believe in a lot of different things." I just wanted to expand on why this is a meaningful reply. |
04-07-2003, 10:10 PM | #22 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,126
|
If god created the universe, who created god?
|
04-07-2003, 10:15 PM | #23 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: kettle falls W.A.
Posts: 16
|
no one God is self existent
|
04-07-2003, 10:21 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: surrounded by fundies
Posts: 768
|
I like cheese.
|
04-07-2003, 10:22 PM | #25 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy
Posts: 12,048
|
Quote:
|
|
04-07-2003, 10:33 PM | #26 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 4,930
|
i have no idea what the first cause was. i don't know if there was one at all. i do not think that the first cause is relevant to my life, personally. i also don't have the scientific vocabulary to discuss the mechanics of the beginning of the universe. at least not with any authority.
in my experience, theists ask this question rhetorically. they presuppose the existence of brahma the creator, and reason backwards from there in an attempt to coerce others into admitting that brahma exists. this is pretty silly, because even when skillfully articulated the first cause argument only informs a kind of theoretical deism. if there WAS a first mover, there is still no indication whatsoever that it was brahma the creator. or the judeo-christian god, for that matter. so it's really irrelevant, if what you're trying to do is argue in favor of hinduism. (or christianity. or whatever.) (we all know it was REALLY the ipu, natch.) |
04-07-2003, 10:40 PM | #27 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fargo, ND, USA
Posts: 1,849
|
Quote:
|
|
04-07-2003, 10:48 PM | #28 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,126
|
Quote:
|
|
04-07-2003, 10:50 PM | #29 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,126
|
Quote:
|
|
04-07-2003, 11:24 PM | #30 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Execution State, USA
Posts: 5,031
|
Bingo!
From this thread:
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|