FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-04-2003, 06:22 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 15,576
Default Historicity of Biblical Characters and Events

This post was initially posted in Bib/crit and I was advised by a moderator that I may get a better response in this forum, so here goes! I'm told that the website in my post has the timelines wrong as well as the points of origins. If anyone could share some sources in my quest to get a better account of Biblical vs historical timelines also, I'd be ever so grateful!:


I think there was a post a while back stating the historicity of Alexander the Great was more than that for Jesus... That's what sparked my post. We always here about the great ancient kings of Egypt, like Thutmose and Akenhaten. Personally I've never studied enough to know the sources for this, however I'm sure it would like in the hieroglyphics.. One good thing about the Egyptians., they valued written record. What I want to know is that of the more popular Biblical characters, such as Abraham, Moses, Kings David and Solomon, is there any textual script to support the existence of these characters, outside of your KJV? I''m not well versed on any of the original Bibles of Hebrew of what not, but what I want to know is that is the Bible our sole source for information on these characters?

There are historical records on Plato, and Aristotle, and Constantine the Great, correct? Well is there anything to corroborate the existence of these characters? Another thing, - the lineages of man have been attributed to Noah's 3 nations idea....for his 3 sons. Is there any historical reference to him as well, and in the scientific community I found this
So I was wondering to what extent in the scientific community (dispite the link I provided) is the idea of Noah being important to the geneaology of mankind prevalent. If he is deemed critical, then he has to be accepted as having existed, (which I was wondering is there an outside source for)

I understand the Bible is going to have a portion of truth as well as it's portion of fancy. I'm wondering where the characters we're presented with lie?

***Final point***
How historically correct are events in the Bible that have been corroborated?
An example I'm referring to is the enslavement of Egyptians during the Moses era. I had questions about how the Egyptians are portrayed in the Bible vs that from what history shows us. I was watching a program about the Great Pyramids, and two scholars balked at the idea that the Egyptians operated a slave system (in a modern European sense) to create the Pyramids. They went on to explain that the workers would have been proud to have worked on a burial palace for the king. The Bible speaks of King Nebuchadnezzar as well, and vilifies him. Was he as evil a king as portrayed? What other errant portrayals of events are there? Is there any balance portrayals in the Bible? Also, there's no evidence of a great flood, right?

I think you all get the jist!

Invictus
Soul Invictus is offline  
Old 02-04-2003, 06:52 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: secularcafe.org
Posts: 9,525
Question

Invictus, you say that the BC&A mods sent you here? I am at a loss as to why- as far as I can tell, the only part of your post which is even close to our usual topics is

Another thing, - the lineages of man have been attributed to Noah's 3 nations idea....for his 3 sons. Is there any historical reference to him as well, and in the scientific community I found this
So I was wondering to what extent in the scientific community (dispite the link I provided) is the idea of Noah being important to the geneaology of mankind prevalent. If he is deemed critical, then he has to be accepted as having existed, (which I was wondering is there an outside source for)


(And you need to add the link you mentioned.)

I suggest that you break this up into 2 posts- one consisting of the above, and the other to go to BC&A, or perhaps General Religion Discussions.

If any of our regulars here have anything to say about the genetic problems which would result if all humanity was descended from the few on the Ark, go ahead. But the rest is not appropriate to this forum.
Jobar is offline  
Old 02-04-2003, 06:54 PM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 15,576
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Jobar
Invictus, you say that the BC&A mods sent you here? I am at a loss as to why- as far as I can tell, the only part of your post which is even close to our usual topics is

Another thing, - the lineages of man have been attributed to Noah's 3 nations idea....for his 3 sons. Is there any historical reference to him as well, and in the scientific community I found this
So I was wondering to what extent in the scientific community (dispite the link I provided) is the idea of Noah being important to the geneaology of mankind prevalent. If he is deemed critical, then he has to be accepted as having existed, (which I was wondering is there an outside source for)


(And you need to add the link you mentioned.)

I suggest that you break this up into 2 posts- one consisting of the above, and the other to go to BC&A, or perhaps General Religion Discussions.

If any of our regulars here have anything to say about the genetic problems which would result if all humanity was descended from the few on the Ark, go ahead. But the rest is not appropriate to this forum.
the link is http://www.osterholm.info/man/

tell me what you think
Soul Invictus is offline  
Old 02-04-2003, 07:02 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
Default

I gather you're after the standard "why the entire human race could not be descended from the arkers" speil. Thats not my thing, but just to clarify: is that what you're looking for?
Doubting Didymus is offline  
Old 02-04-2003, 07:24 PM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 15,576
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Doubting Didymus
I gather you're after the standard "why the entire human race could not be descended from the arkers" speil. Thats not my thing, but just to clarify: is that what you're looking for?
I know I may write a bit convoluted but I'll try to explain it better.

I've read a lot of info that assumes the Noah account as the determinant. (I'm a novice in anthro affairs)

I'm looking for more info on the account of human civilizations...the Noah account is a bit much for me. Aren't the Chinese (Asian) people totally excluded?

Invictus
Soul Invictus is offline  
Old 02-04-2003, 10:34 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dana Point, Ca, USA
Posts: 2,115
Default

As far as the Moses, Abraham, and the rest go, I would recommend that you read The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology’s New Vision of Anciennt Israel and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts by Israel Finkelstein and Neil Silberman. Finkelstein and Silberman are internationally respected scholars of the ancient mideast and the Bible.
Dr.GH is offline  
Old 02-05-2003, 03:01 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: US and UK
Posts: 846
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Dr.GH
As far as the Moses, Abraham, and the rest go, I would recommend that you read The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology’s New Vision of Anciennt Israel and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts by Israel Finkelstein and Neil Silberman. Finkelstein and Silberman are internationally respected scholars of the ancient mideast and the Bible.
I concur. Prompted by a debate on this board I read it a couple of months back. It really is fascinating.
beausoleil is offline  
Old 02-05-2003, 06:28 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: secularcafe.org
Posts: 9,525
Default

Can anyone refer him to a thread here on E/C which discusses the matter?
Jobar is offline  
Old 02-05-2003, 09:05 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the land of two boys and no sleep.
Posts: 9,890
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Dr.GH
As far as the Moses, Abraham, and the rest go, I would recommend that you read The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology’s New Vision of Anciennt Israel and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts by Israel Finkelstein and Neil Silberman. Finkelstein and Silberman are internationally respected scholars of the ancient mideast and the Bible.
I bought this on a previous recommendation of yours (I believe). I am enjoying it immensly and agree it is a great starting point.
Wyz_sub10 is offline  
Old 02-05-2003, 03:57 PM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 15,576
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by beausoleil
I concur. Prompted by a debate on this board I read it a couple of months back. It really is fascinating.
Would you be able to refer me to that particular thread/topic?
Soul Invictus is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:43 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.