FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-19-2003, 06:40 PM   #131
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by christ-on-a-stick
Blatantly false.

Christ a Fiction

Did Jesus Exist?

The Jesus Puzzle

Who was the Historical Jesus?

And there are many, MANY more. Are you going to claim that none of these authors have "any historic knowledge"???

*PLEASE NOTE* that I am not claiming to have done enough historical research to have a definite and defensible opinion. However, your claim of "almost no historian or person with any historic knowledge" (not accepting Jesus' existence) is simply not factually true. Historians have questioned and debated the historicity of Jesus for years and years. I'll be happy to find more links and resources for you if you wish.

The Roman official Tacitus:

"Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero falsely charged with the guilt, and punished with the most exquisite tortures a class hated for their abominations, people called Christians by the populace. Christus [Christ], from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius [AD 14-37] at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilate. But the pernicious superstition, repressed for a time broke out again, not only through Judea, where the mischief originated, but through the city of Rome also." Annals 15.44.

Seutonius, a Roman Historian.

"Because the Jews at Rome caused constant disturbances at the instigation of Chrestus [Christ], he [Claudius] expelled them from the city [Rome]." Life of Claudius.

The Jewish Talmud:

"On the eve of the Passover Yeshu [Jesus] was hanged. . . but since nothing was brought forward in his favor he was hanged on the eve of the Passover." Babylonia Sanhedrin 43A

Phlegin, a historian who lived in the 1st century:

"Phlegon mentioned the eclipse which took place during the crucifixion of the Lord Jesus and no other (eclipse); it is clear that he did not know from his sources about any (similar) eclipse in previous times . . . and this is shown by the historical account of Tiberius Caesar." De. opif. mund. II21

Lucian, a hostile to Christians in the 2nd Century:

"The Christians. . . worship a man to this day - the distinguished personage who introduced this new cult, and was crucified on that account. . . . You see, these misguided creatures start with the general conviction that they are immortal for all time, which explains their contempt for death and self devotion . . . their lawgiver [taught] they are all brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws. All this they take on faith . . . " The Passing Peregrinus

Pliny, a roman senator:

Christians were "meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verse a hymn to Christ as to a god, and bound themselves to a solemn oath, not to do wicked deeds, never commit fraud, theft, adultery, not to lie nor to deny a trust. . . " Epistles X96

And alot of atheists on this board don't deny that Jesus the person existed and was crucified.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 03-19-2003, 06:45 PM   #132
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Durango, Colorado
Posts: 7,116
Default

Magus, exactly how is any of that relevant to the falsity of your statement? If you wish to rephrase your statement you are certainly welcome to do so but the fact remains that your original claim of
Quote:
Almost no historian or person with any historic knowledge doesn't accept the fact that Jesus Christ of Nazareth existed.
is not true. Can you address that please? And again, I'd be happy to furnish additional links that show that historians have been investigating and wrestling with this issue for many, MANY years - and that many reputable historians and scholars are of the opinion that Jesus as portrayed in the Gospels is in fact wholly or in part mythical.
christ-on-a-stick is offline  
Old 03-19-2003, 06:54 PM   #133
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Ok fine, Some historians still claim he didn't exist, most don't, including the people closest to the time period.

Happy?
Magus55 is offline  
Old 03-19-2003, 07:08 PM   #134
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Durango, Colorado
Posts: 7,116
Talking

Yes, Magus, I *AM* happy!

I would point out though that in a sense, you are using "argumentum ad populum" here... recall that at one time most people thought the earth was flat, and most of the scientists of the time backed 'em up, until it was *definitively* proven to be false.

The problem with such long-past history is that unlike scientific matters it is not quite so easy to definitively prove (or disprove). IMO it therefore becomes a matter of probability based on evidence, for which we still have none "for" a historical Jesus outside ancient texts (which exist for ALL the alleged deities et al) and a lot "against" by virtue of a more detailed analysis of said texts in contrast with other more consistent history of the day.

Lauri
christ-on-a-stick is offline  
Old 03-19-2003, 07:39 PM   #135
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Ok fine, Some historians still claim he didn't exist, most don't, including the people closest to the time period.
Unfortunately, these references are extremely tiny, and very unsuggestive of the kind of celebrity depicted in the Gospels. Furthermore, none of these historians had had first-hand knowledge of Jesus Christ -- they only learned of him from his followers.
lpetrich is offline  
Old 03-19-2003, 09:08 PM   #136
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Portland OR USA
Posts: 1,098
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
To atheists B), to Christians A), since neither can prove it, its a moot point. I think A is more rational because i believe God created the universe, you think B is more rational because the universe formed itself.
Magus, is your faith so weak that you truly have to lie to yourself this way? Option B didn't exclude God from creating it. So you seem to be saying that you honestly believe that it is more plausible, more rational, that things are NOT as they seem, because otherwise you don't see how god could have made them.
oriecat is offline  
Old 05-28-2003, 04:23 PM   #137
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,425
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
It was just an example since we don't know whether God helped her or not. He could have by saving her from more pain and suffering, who knows. And i didn't bother reading the article since its the same dumb claims by atheists that God can't exist because there are so many sick, evil humans
You came to this conclusion before even reading the article. Hmm. Didn't Jesus tell you not to judge? This is a clear example of theists following their beliefs only when it suits them.
winstonjen is offline  
Old 05-28-2003, 06:16 PM   #138
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,872
Default

No problems with Jewish kids jeering at prophets since then, I hear.

But then military style boot camp works too.

Rad
Radorth is offline  
Old 05-28-2003, 06:45 PM   #139
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,351
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally posted by QueenofSwords
Maybe when it rains, Magus thinks the little dead children are peeing.

Entirely in poor taste.
AquaVita is offline  
Old 05-28-2003, 06:55 PM   #140
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 106
Default Re: What????

Quote:
Originally posted by Porky Houton
Originally posted by Magus55
Hindley used his Free will to do that to the girl, such is the problem with corrupt people having responsbility. God isn't gonna stop every little single thing dumb people do.

Perhaps you missed this part of the post:

"The girl was sexually abused, tortured and forced to pose for pornographic photos."

You see this as a "little...thing"? I think if you read the Bible again you will find that your god overrides the free agency of people all the time.
Actually God has never "over-ridden" anyones freewill. Those that did God's bidding, did so willingly. It may be true that God used methods to get SOME to do his will, but others did it willingly because they were men of God.

The thing you as atheists don't understand, is that God is just that God! If he wanted to he could MAKE us worship him. But because he loves us and wants us to WANT to worship him he leaves us to our own, thats freewill!
Tarnaak is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:37 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.