FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-08-2002, 09:24 AM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy
Posts: 12,048
Thumbs up Injunction against JerryFalwell.com

The <a href="http://www.newsadvance.com/news/archive/MGBBWYVFP2D.html" target="_blank">Lynchburg News And Advance</a> reports on Falwell's failed bid to get WIPO to force a parody website to hand over the domain name Jerryfalwell.com. He's now taking it to US District court, seeking an injunction against the operators of the parody website, claiming - get this - trademark violation!

Needless to say, <a href="http://www.jerryfalwell.com" target="_blank">JerryFalwell.com</a> had a few choice words to say as well.

Enjoy!

[ July 08, 2002: Message edited by: Kind Bud ]</p>
Autonemesis is offline  
Old 07-08-2002, 09:43 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Denver, Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,834
Thumbs up

Hurray for people who stand up to cyber bullying!
ohwilleke is offline  
Old 07-08-2002, 09:50 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Twin Cities, USA
Posts: 3,197
Post

Is there any way Falwell could sue for libel? I agree - the trademark violation argument is stupid. It's not like the name is associated with a product (unless you count bigotry as a product).
Bree is offline  
Old 07-08-2002, 09:52 AM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Post

Falwell already lost his libel case against Penthouse for much worse.

It's called the First Amendment right to free speech, and long may it prevail.
Toto is offline  
Old 07-08-2002, 10:06 AM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Post

IIRC, the Libel case Falwell lost was against Hustler/Larry Flynt.

As far as Falwell suing for Trademark violation:

"The right of publicity gives an individual a legal claim against one who uses the individual's name, face, image, or voice for commercial benefit without obtaining permission. "

(emphasis mine)

So he can sue for Trademark infringement. Whether he can win or not is uncertain and, of course, depends on the facts of the case (is the use for commercial benefit or merely to parody the individual, which the courts have usually protected as a form of free speech) and the leanings of the Court the case is before.

IIRC several well-known individuals have successfully sued to protect their names as Trademarks.
Mageth is offline  
Old 07-08-2002, 10:14 AM   #6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 125
Post

For more information on the whole "cyber-bullying" issue, check out the Nissan vs. Nissan debate, which I think you can find at Salon.com...

I'll try to find the exact link.

Update :
<a href="http://www.salon.com/tech/col/leon/2002/06/03/nissan/" target="_blank">http://www.salon.com/tech/col/leon/2002/06/03/nissan/</a>

[ July 08, 2002: Message edited by: LordMoneyG ]</p>
LordMoneyG is offline  
Old 07-08-2002, 01:07 PM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Post

You're right, it was Larry Flynt, not Penthouse.

<a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=US&vol=485&page=46" target="_blank">HUSTLER MAGAZINE v. FALWELL, 485 U.S. 46 (1988) </a>
Toto is offline  
Old 07-08-2002, 08:12 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
Post

Falwell should look at trademark law. Parodies are legal use of copyright and trademark.
RufusAtticus is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:24 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.