![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#51 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: heavenly Georgia
Posts: 3,862
|
![]()
Since the world is suffering from symptoms of overpopulation, it seems mighty ironic to me that some people are threatened by a practice that doesn't add to the problem of overpopulation. The world's population has more than doubled in the last 50 years. I find that frightening. How will humanity be able to find the necessary resources to support such a rapidly growing population? There are already serious concerns that water is becoming a limited resource. Those who practise homosexuality are doing the rest of us a favor.
![]() I think that those who oppose gay sex are just suffering from their own bigotry and prejudice. Such prejudice is based on long standing bias against those who live their lives a little bit differently than the rest of us. Homosexuality is no threat to anyone. How could the sexual practices of two consenting adults possibly be a threat? Bigotry is a potential threat to all of us that want to live in a positive, tolerant society filled with interesting and diverse people. |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,215
|
![]()
As southernhybrid just pointed out, we have a problem on earth of overpopulation, so why should we care that not everyone is reproducing, for whatever reason? I know several heterosexuals who have moral problems with other heterosexuals having more than one or two kids because of the overpopulation problem.
Aren't we all here to experience life, which for some (like me) includes the very rewarding experience of raising children, but certainly includes much more? I know many homosexuals, who in my opinion, are contributing a lot more to society than lots of heterosexuals I know. I'm not even sure it's up to me to care how much everyone is contributing to the community as long as they're not bothering me in the first place. On a lighter note, Dr. Rick, what were you doing in the gaggle of potential bouquet catchers in the first place? I thought that was for single people and aren't you married? I mean, there are some traditions we shouldn't mess with! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,215
|
![]()
Just married people. The couple whose wedding you attended would no longer be eligible for the bouquet or garter toss either.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#55 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,118
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#56 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,118
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#57 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
|
![]() Quote:
One other question: do I still get to kiss the bride? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 170
|
![]()
Up to this point I have used the methods of moral relativism to show how homosexuality is wrong. However, you want me to show how its wrong as a moral absolute. It is useless for me to argue from a moral absolute point of view if no one here believes in moral absolutes.
However, if someone does then I would be more than happy to show how homosexuality is wrong for all poeple for all time, no exceptions. Does anyone here believe in moral absolutes? -phil |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#60 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,261
|
![]() Quote:
As a hint though - Do I believe that moral absolute truth can be gleaned from a poorly-written book filled with middle eastern fairy tales? No most of us here do not, so I don't recommend using that as part of your argument. scigirl |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|