FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-11-2003, 05:53 AM   #41
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: heavenly Georgia
Posts: 3,862
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by DMB
Pensee: your supervisor's reaction seems pretty shocking: no consideration of the illegality, but treating it merely as a matter of personal choice or conviction.
I agree. I think your instructor's response is even more shocking than the classroom teacher's use of prayer. Damn.

What about the dean of education. Is she/he approachable?

I wouldn't mention my plan to omit the prayer to the classroom teacher. I just wouldn't do it. If she asked why, I'd say calmly, "I support the separation of church and state and can't condone teacher led prayer. I hope you will respect my feelings on this and not make it an issue between us."

If the children asked, I might just say that not everyone prays before lunch so out of respect for people's differences you are going to allow those that want to, to pray to silently to themselves.

Btw, I think that Mississippi has been in legal trouble many times over the years on this very issue. The state has been told to stop this practice but obviously it's hard to enforce when the citizens of the state continue to condone the practice. Perhaps as the state becomes a lot more diverse, things will change. If demagraphics there follow the pattern of most of the other Southern states, that time is coming soon.

On a brighter note, I read in the AJC this morning that the latest Gallop poll results reveal that religiosity is at an all time low in the US. That's good news.
southernhybrid is offline  
Old 01-11-2003, 11:09 AM   #42
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
Default

[Post deleted. Apparently I was responding to either sarcasm or Devil's Advocacy.]
hezekiah jones is offline  
Old 01-11-2003, 11:19 AM   #43
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by southernhybrid
. . .
On a brighter note, I read in the AJC this morning that the latest Gallop poll results reveal that religiosity is at an all time low in the US. That's good news.
Not religiosity, just the opinion of "organized religion".

Organized religion slips in survey

However, the dip is being attributed to the Catholic pedophile scandal. There is no signficant dip in "belief in God, willingness to state a religious preference, membership in a church, weekly church attendance, a belief that religion is very important in life, and a belief that religion answers problems."

I have mixed feelings about this. It is clearly illegal, but I can just see the headlines on Jay Sekolow's fundraising letters - Secular Humanists won't let kids say grace!
Toto is offline  
Old 01-11-2003, 06:53 PM   #44
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 6,261
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by ybnormal
1) This IS kindergarten we're talking about here. ANYTHING, in any way connected to any nuance of prayer, is the conditioning of young children to the process of religion. Subtle or not, this is indoctrination into the process. The fact that this conditioning is less than they get at home, misses the entire point. There are children who get NONE of this conditioning at home. The state should not be in the "religion conditioning" business, period.
Nobody disagrees with the illegality of religious conditioning. My point is that prayer in kindergarten neither breaks nor makes one's religious preference: if the kids are indoctrinated at home, removing the prayer won't change that, and if they aren't indoctrinated at home they might think the prayer is silly but won't be magically converted. Especially if there is no prayer but just a "moment of silence", which I advocated as one alternative course of action in this particular case. Besides the point why I think that's even an alternative to not having a prayer at all is because I think it might help undo the programming. It's more like "moment of thinking about the pointlessness of saying grace before eating".

Quote:
If you don't understand that, then I shall suggest that you are a victim of what I call the "perceived goodness" of this kind of religious indoctrination.
More like "perceived non-severity". As a general rule, the state should not impose religious views on people. However, having been raised in a society where that happens anyway, I can tell that it's not the end of the world. Much less so when we're not talking about general rules but rather what one individual should do in this particular instance, and it's not even prayer that I'm suggesting but highlighting the absence of prayer. I am not in favour of state issuing moments of silence either, but if a teacher wants to use that to make point about silliness of prayer, then by all means she/he can do it.

Quote:
IOW, why should any 5 YO, be automatically considered capable of consenting to this religious training, by the state itself no less?
If a freethinker takes out prayer, and says they can say grace silently to themselves if they want to, I think that's hardly "consenting to religious training by the state".

Quote:
Your final remark, that Most of the kids are from christian families after all., implies to me, that it's kinda OK for the state to help "Most" parents religiously condition their kids, since they are going to be Christians anyway.
That was said in conjunction with my suspicions why the "moment of silence" might not work, not as a justification for it. The only reason why I think that moment of silence is an alternative to no prayer at all is because I think it might help undo the programming and teach kids to think. I am not convinced if it's a plausible course of action, but I do think that whatever lets kids figure out that they don't need to bless their food in order to eat is at least worth considering.
Jayjay is offline  
Old 01-11-2003, 08:15 PM   #45
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,872
Default

If it's illegal, Christians should not do it, unless it is clearly opposed to one of God's commandments. There is no commandment for kids to pray in school.

They fake it anyway.

Rad
Radorth is offline  
Old 01-11-2003, 11:01 PM   #46
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: ...
Posts: 2,191
Post

Well, considering that the teacher admitted that she is knowingly breaking the law every day then she needs to be punished. I think she should be fired - and even that would be getting off to easy IMO.
Krieger is offline  
Old 01-12-2003, 08:02 AM   #47
Talk Freethought Staff
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: OH
Posts: 5,266
Default

If I were in your shoes, I have to confess that I would just take in a tape recorder and tape it for future reference without the teacher's knowledge. When you're in a position to use it, you can consider if you want to. I figure it's better to have it and decide you don't want to use it than to wish later you had done it.
As to the day you are supposed to teach, I would simply state that since I am starting my career, I don't want to risk it by engaging in illegal activities, therefore I will not lead the prayer. No need to get in to a philosophical debate when you are the student and the teacher has obviously made up her mind and will be grading you and you'll be dependent on her recommendations.
JMO
Never is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:10 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.