Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-16-2003, 11:17 AM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 6,261
|
Endogenous retrovirus question
I was browsing through the talkorigins' "29 evidence for macroevolution", and a question sprang to my mind about endogenous retroviruses. According to the article, we've identified 7 shared endogenous viruses between humans and chimps, and we know that about 1% of our genome is just non-coding viruses.
My question is, how do we know that a given non-coding portion of DNA is a virus, and not something else? Edit: :banghead: Ack, didn't notice they were discussed in another thread already... |
02-16-2003, 11:51 AM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 9,747
|
I guess you've found the answer already, but it's the presence of gag, pol, and env genes that define a retrovirus. And they aren't necessarily non-coding.
theyeti |
02-16-2003, 06:20 PM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 6,261
|
Actually, I haven't yet found an answr. "Gag, pol and env"?
|
02-16-2003, 08:55 PM | #4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: St Louis area
Posts: 3,458
|
Quote:
In addition to the three genes found in retroviruses are what are called LTRs, or Long Terminal Repeats; repeated sequences at each end of the viral genome. So the typical structure of a retrovirus is: LTR-GAG-POL-ENV-LTR Often times, due to certain recombination events, one encounters only a single or both LTRs integrated into the host genome in the absence of the other genes. |
|
02-17-2003, 05:02 AM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 6,261
|
Thanks!
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|