Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-06-2003, 03:07 AM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Amman, Jordan
Posts: 258
|
Human evolution
Can anyone summarize the things we know about human evolution including the known fossil record and the gaps that we are hoping to find in order to shut the creationists up?
|
03-06-2003, 03:36 AM | #2 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
|
Re: Human evolution
Quote:
Summarise? Okay: we know bloody tons of stuff. To even summarise it would take a book. Such as... < ta-dah! > The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Evolution, which does just what you ask! Covers the lot, from fossils to DNA to primatology to comparative anatomy. Best single volume on all aspects I know of. Check your library... or just buy it! More specifically on fossils, try these three: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/ http://www.mnh.si.edu/anthro/humanorigins/ http://www.anth.ucsb.edu/projects/human Question is, what gaps? Cheers, DT |
|
03-06-2003, 03:45 AM | #3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edinburgh. Scotland
Posts: 2,532
|
Re: Re: Human evolution
Quote:
Does that count? |
|
03-06-2003, 05:34 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 506
|
Hm.
No, I don't think it is possible to *summarize* all we know in one handy dandy post, because we know so much. The Talk Origins faq on hominids is as good a summary as you'd want, and it goes on for pages. You might also want to read The Fossil Trail by Ian Tattersall; it's a bit out of date wrt fossil finds, but not on how we know what we know. Keep in mind that paleoanthropologists don't give much of a damn about creationists, and do not go about their business intending to "shut them up". Creationist opinion is entirely irrelevant to paleoanthropology. Plus the fact that *no* amount of evidence will ever be enough for them, because the whole "debate" is not about evidence anyway. |
03-06-2003, 09:56 AM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
|
Rufus Summarizes It All
Similarities and homologies in morphologies show that we are most closely related to chimps, gorillas, and oragutans. Similarities and homologies in our genetic material show that we are most closely related to chimps, gorillas, and oragutans. The fossil record reveals a series that show a transition of an ape lineage from specimans lacking human characters to specimans that are more and more similar to modern man. |
03-06-2003, 12:37 PM | #6 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Amman, Jordan
Posts: 258
|
Quote:
|
|
03-06-2003, 02:01 PM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
|
|
03-06-2003, 02:07 PM | #8 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
|
Quote:
Erm, I gave you plenty of detail in those links... and conversely, Rufus put it a nutshell. Perhaps you could tell us just what is the right amount? A paragraph or two? 1500 words, or 3000? Can you say 'spoonfeed'? DT, but also and a little |
|
03-06-2003, 02:24 PM | #9 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Amman, Jordan
Posts: 258
|
Rufus gave me what I was looking for, call it spoonfeeding, call it whatever. People have other things to do in life. To me, this is the purpose of having forums like this, LEARNING without having to reinvent the wheel.
Cheers |
03-07-2003, 04:18 AM | #10 |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
|
Righty-ho. Just that Rufus's 'Fossil Hominid FAQ' link was the first one I gave you too...
DT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|