|
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-25-2002, 08:22 PM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 215
|
Subject-object correlation?
Can someone explain to me what exactly Ed is arguing when he talks about "subject-obect correlation"?
|
|
|
05-25-2002, 09:57 PM
|
#2 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX, US
Posts: 244
|
I is not sure. Can yous tell me where we can find this discussions? As far as we knows, it sound like a gramatical issues. We is pretty aware of correct grammar, and she may be able to helps.
|
|
|
|
05-26-2002, 01:30 AM
|
#3 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Just another hick from the sticks.
Posts: 1,108
|
Ed: I am just using amoebas as an example. If there was no subject-object correlation then we would be in the same boat as the amoeba no matter how intelligent we were.
I'm not sure either. d |
|
|
|
05-26-2002, 01:36 AM
|
#4 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
|
Duvenoy, is that you ?
 _________ For answers on the subject/object differentiation (SOD), <a href="http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=56&t=000167&p=1" target="_blank">go here to this thread;</a> you may go away as mystified as before, but at least with some more words.  Ah well, sod it all. [ May 26, 2002: Message edited by: Gurdur ]</p> |
|
|
|
05-26-2002, 02:40 AM
|
#5 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Just another hick from the sticks.
Posts: 1,108
|
Yeah Gurdur, it be's me, wasting my life staring at the monitor.
Thanks for the link. I've read the first page and, after sorting through the argument, I think I kind'a/sort'a see where Ed's coming from. However, I'm not sure it applies to amoebas hiding under shoes. Ah well. A deep thinker, I ain't. Many thanks. I'll get back to that thread a little later. It's interesting. d |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
