FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-27-2002, 03:25 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: P.O.Box 691716, West Hollywood, CA, USA
Posts: 79
Question A question for atheists

Would any atheists be willing to concede that the theory that our universe is composed in large part of so called dark matter and dark energy leaves open the possibility that a divine eternal essence to self and world might also exist undetected by science?
High Ideologue is offline  
Old 12-28-2002, 03:53 AM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Nowhere Land
Posts: 441
Default

Your reasoning is a classic case of an 'appeal to ignorance.'
Not because I don't know doesn't mean it exists. It only means we should try harder to discover the truth behind 'dark matters' and what else. To claim supernatural explanation to things unknown is simply indolence. We have progressed through the years, let's not return to time where unknown can simply be brushed off as "handiworks of God."
Rousseau_CHN is offline  
Old 12-28-2002, 05:04 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 6,261
Default

Yes, but let us not forget the possibility of pink, transparent single-horned horselike creatures existing undetected by science as well.

Anyway, what does "self" have to do with dark matter? That is over there, we are over here... unless it is the denseness of the religionists that keeps galaxies together.
Jayjay is offline  
Old 12-28-2002, 06:51 AM   #4
Ut
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 828
Default

Science never has, does not, and never will make any claims, positive or negative, on supernatural entities like "divine eternal essence". The job of science is to study nature.
Ut is offline  
Old 12-28-2002, 07:13 AM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Deployed to Kosovo
Posts: 4,314
Default

Yeah, I have no problem saying that it's possible.

But there's little point in me believing in something if there isn't any evidence for or against it.
Daggah is offline  
Old 12-28-2002, 07:20 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,059
Default

Hello High Idealogue,

Why should the mere existence of dark matter suggest a divine eternal self? What is the connection between them?

And if you feel it suggested one of the three, then how do the other two come about? If there is a self, why must it be divine and eternal? If it is eternal, why must it be a self (that is, self-aware)? And so on.

For the record, I think if a god did exist, then it's extremely likely that man's limited conceptions of the divine would totally ignore it. As it is, people tend, I think, to look for evidence of their particular god, rather than for a god. I would expect Christian scientists to totally ignore evidence that would point up the existence of the IPU.

Let me ask you a question in turn: Are you willing to concede the possibility of a totally naturalistic universe, assuming you can't find any evidence for god, or do you think there has to be a god somewhere?

-Perchance.
Perchance is offline  
Old 12-28-2002, 08:01 AM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default Re: A question for atheists

Quote:
Originally posted by High Ideologue
Would any atheists be willing to concede that the theory that our universe is composed in large part of so called dark matter and dark energy leaves open the possibility that a divine eternal essence to self and world might also exist undetected by science.
Sure, I'm willing to concede anything. What's the rate of pay, and in what currency?
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 12-28-2002, 08:15 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Sundsvall, Sweden
Posts: 3,159
Talking Re: A question for atheists

Quote:
Originally posted by High Ideologue
Would any atheists be willing to concede that the theory that our universe is composed in large part of so called dark matter and dark energy leaves open the possibility that a divine eternal essence to self and world might also exist undetected by science.
Are you saying that God has mass? LOL! You might as well ask: do you concede that neutron stars might be God?
Eudaimonist is offline  
Old 12-28-2002, 11:15 AM   #9
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 385
Default

I actually view it as the opposite. If a g*d does exist, then he used dark matter to correct a poor original design. Not very g*d-like.
Peregrine is offline  
Old 12-28-2002, 12:59 PM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: P.O.Box 691716, West Hollywood, CA, USA
Posts: 79
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Perchance
Hello High Idealogue,

Why should the mere existence of dark matter suggest a divine eternal self?

Dark matter does not suggest a divine eternal self and world per se. However, as I understand it, atheism is predicated on the exclusion of a divine eternal essence to self and world from a naturalistic model of self and universe. Since atheists seem determined to promote the idea that there is no divine eternal essence to self and world, I wonder whether large problems with their models of our physical universe such the postulated existence of dark matter and dark energy cause any problems for them in maintaining their convictions.

Quote:
Perchance

What is the connection between them?

I think, believe and expect more than a few scientists would like to know.

Quote:
Perchance

And if you feel it suggested one of the three, then how do the other two come about? If there is a self, why must it be divine and eternal? If it is eternal, why must it be a self (that is, self-aware)? And so on. For the record, I think if a god did exist, then it's extremely likely that man's limited conceptions of the divine would totally ignore it. As it is, people tend, I think, to look for evidence of their particular god, rather than for a god. I would expect Christian scientists to totally ignore evidence that would point up the existence of the IPU.

Your use of the phrase 'must' suggest to me that you think that I am trying pass off myth and fantasy based on the mystery of existence (the possible existence of a divine eternal essence to self and world) as truth and knowledge based on the discovery of existence. I assure you I am not and assure you that I can make a positive distinction between myth and fantasy based on the mystery of existence and truth and knowledge based on the discovery of existence.

I wrote a book entitled the House of Ideology Manifesto about all of these kinds of questions. It is available to anyone to read free of charge at the official website of the High Ideologue of the House of Ideology located @ http://4iam.tripod.com A more complete exposition on these topics may be found there.

Quote:


Let me ask you a question in turn: Are you willing to concede the possibility of a totally naturalistic universe, assuming you can't find any evidence for god, or do you think there has to be a god somewhere?

-Perchance.
Yes it is possible that the life we experience is merely a byproduct of a totally naturalistic universe. However I recognize that like my belief in the existence of a divine eternal essence of self and world, belief in a totally naturalistic universe is one possibility out of a number, diversity, and variety only limited by our creative abilities and powers of imagination.
High Ideologue is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:44 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.