Freethought & Rationalism Archive

mike_decock · 04-29-2003, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Metacrock
why would anyone accept an historical Gilgamesh and not historical Jesus?

Just to spite you, Meta.

-Mike...

Vinnie · 04-29-2003, 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by mike_decock
Just to spite you, Meta.

-Mike...

fo rizzo?

Vinnie

Marduk · 04-29-2003, 03:25 PM

�Do you have any special powers?�

Yes, I can post messages that can be seen around the entire world!

�why would anyone accept an historical Gilgamesh and not historical Jesus?�

I don�t know, I think there were real people behind both figures. But if Gilgamesh�s tomb is found with his body and a sign saying �here lies King Gilgamesh� then that is more physical evidence than for Jesus, even if he is 1500 years earlier than Jesus.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

04-29-2003, 03:25 PM	#13
Marduk Veteran Member Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: the 10th planet Posts: 5,065	�Do you have any special powers?� Yes, I can post messages that can be seen around the entire world! �why would anyone accept an historical Gilgamesh and not historical Jesus?� I don�t know, I think there were real people behind both figures. But if Gilgamesh�s tomb is found with his body and a sign saying �here lies King Gilgamesh� then that is more physical evidence than for Jesus, even if he is 1500 years earlier than Jesus.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.