Freethought & Rationalism Archive

braces_for_impact · 03-20-2003, 07:36 AM

Part of the Evil Atheist Conspiracy, obviously.

The ET's, like the Christians, will fall and become our satanic lapdogs.

Muwahahahahaahhah!

Aethernaut · 03-20-2003, 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by braces_for_impact
Part of the Evil Atheist Conspiracy, obviously.

The ET's, like the Christians, will fall and become our satanic lapdogs.

Muwahahahahaahhah!

No doubt!!

Dominus Paradoxum · 03-20-2003, 07:56 AM

Uh, morgan, THEY"RE THE SAME THING, [deleted insult] Did you even read all of the pages? Right at the top of http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level...Dark/Dark.html , it says "DARK ENERGY ANTIGRAVITY". And at the top of http://www.princeton.edu/pr/pwb/99/0621/force.htm it says, "Antigravity force, methane dwarfs". Dark energy = antigravity = the cosmological constant. They're the same thing. Anti gravity is indeed the "pressure" or repulsive force which is driving the universe apart.

David-Unfamous · 03-20-2003, 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MorganV12
That may be so, but it doesn't account for 70,000 people seeing the sun dance or fall. This is not an event that is witnessing a UFO, this is the sun that they see move in a circle and then drop.

Morgan

The question is not how 70,000 people allegedly witnessed the Sun 'dance' around and then drop, but how the rest of the Earth's population did *not* notice such an event.

I mean, you'd expect at least a billion people to have noticed our favourite star do the tango. Wouldn't you?

MorganV12 · 03-20-2003, 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dominus Paradoxum
Uh, morgan, THEY"RE THE SAME THING, idiot. Did you even read all of the pages? Right at the top of http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level...Dark/Dark.html , it says "DARK ENERGY ANTIGRAVITY". And at the top of http://www.princeton.edu/pr/pwb/99/0621/force.htm it says, "Antigravity force, methane dwarfs". Dark energy = antigravity = the cosmological constant. They're the same thing. Anti gravity is indeed the "pressure" or repulsive force which is driving the universe apart.

WRONG again, the term anti-gravity is being used as a analogous term. Quantum vacuum energy has been demonstrated to effect a pressure, note the term here pressure, to squeeze two plates together in lab experiments. The repulsive force, described on those pages, is fueled by GRAVITY! The virtual particles (quantum vacuum energy) are pumped into the universe by gravity, creating a higher pressure inside the universe and forcing an expansion. If you understood anything that was on those pages...[deleted insult ].

Morgan

MorganV12 · 03-20-2003, 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by David-Unfamous
I mean, you'd expect at least a billion people to have noticed
our favourite star do the tango. Wouldn't you?

That's the whole point of the site's explanation or can't you read English!

Morgan

MorganV12 · 03-20-2003, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Schrodinger's Kitten
Agreed. And it becomes a delusion when one starts believing the stories with no proof. The repeated ad hominem attacks and acusations of the ignorance of everyone here kind of backs that up as well. I'm sure there must be a conspiracy in the general scientific community to cover up The Truth (tm).

Again you hide behind your ignorance, nowhere on the site does it claim that there are conspiracies on the part of any government or scientific institution.

Morgan

Mageth · 03-20-2003, 01:01 PM

I'm not a moderator, but in the interest of civility and in maintaining the forum rules I'd suggest various posters refrain from calling each other "idiot" etc. on this thread, and if you would, go ahead and edit out your previous examples of such to save the mods the work of having to edit your posts for you.

Wyz_sub10 · 03-20-2003, 01:41 PM

I'm locking this until I can review it and make the necessary edits.

Wyz_sub10 · 03-20-2003, 01:55 PM

I'm keeping this thread closed.

S&S is a busy place, with dozens of people discussing dozens of ideas and citing dozens of references.

I doubt my fellow mods have the time to spend editing almost every single post due to needless violations of the rules, as has been the case in this thread. I know I don't.

If anyone wants to resume this discussion, start a new thread and keep it civil.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

03-20-2003, 07:36 AM	#31
braces_for_impact Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: In a nondescript, black helicopter. Posts: 6,637	Part of the Evil Atheist Conspiracy, obviously. The ET's, like the Christians, will fall and become our satanic lapdogs. Muwahahahahaahhah!

03-20-2003, 07:56 AM	#33
Dominus Paradoxum Veteran Member Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: California Posts: 1,000	Uh, morgan, THEY"RE THE SAME THING, [deleted insult] Did you even read all of the pages? Right at the top of http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level...Dark/Dark.html , it says "DARK ENERGY ANTIGRAVITY". And at the top of http://www.princeton.edu/pr/pwb/99/0621/force.htm it says, "Antigravity force, methane dwarfs". Dark energy = antigravity = the cosmological constant. They're the same thing. Anti gravity is indeed the "pressure" or repulsive force which is driving the universe apart.

03-20-2003, 01:01 PM	#38
Mageth Contributor Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas Posts: 29,689	I'm not a moderator, but in the interest of civility and in maintaining the forum rules I'd suggest various posters refrain from calling each other "idiot" etc. on this thread, and if you would, go ahead and edit out your previous examples of such to save the mods the work of having to edit your posts for you.

03-20-2003, 01:41 PM	#39
Wyz_sub10 Veteran Member Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: In the land of two boys and no sleep. Posts: 9,890	I'm locking this until I can review it and make the necessary edits.

03-20-2003, 01:55 PM	#40
Wyz_sub10 Veteran Member Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: In the land of two boys and no sleep. Posts: 9,890	I'm keeping this thread closed. S&S is a busy place, with dozens of people discussing dozens of ideas and citing dozens of references. I doubt my fellow mods have the time to spend editing almost every single post due to needless violations of the rules, as has been the case in this thread. I know I don't. If anyone wants to resume this discussion, start a new thread and keep it civil.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.