FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-24-2003, 07:28 AM   #41
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Question

Quote:
OK. But if there had been no Wizard of OZ, there would have been no yellow brick road.
So you're saying there IS a yellow brick road?
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 07:30 AM   #42
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: glasgow, scotland
Posts: 356
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by worldling
And I am not saying that the Yellow Brick Road is proof of the Wizard of Oz in itself, but it is consistent with it. If the Wizard of Oz is to be disproved, the Yellow Brick Road has to be explained - to say nothing of the Tin Man's new heart, the Lion's courage, and the Scarecrow's new brain.
:notworthy


malookiemaloo
malookiemaloo is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 07:36 AM   #43
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: glasgow, scotland
Posts: 356
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Jack the Bodiless
So you're saying there IS a yellow brick road?
If there is a wizard.


malookiemaloo
malookiemaloo is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 09:08 AM   #44
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by malookiemaloo
Can you refresh my memory on this.

As I recall, one gospel traces Jesus through Mary's line, another, Joseph's.

Why do we have to refresh your memory? You're the one that's the Christian! You should know this stuff!

Now, if Jesus was the result of a virgin birth, then what's the point of tracing his lineage through Joseph? Your entire claim to his supernatural nature rests on Joseph having nothing to do with the dirty deed.
Kosh is offline  
Old 02-25-2003, 12:02 AM   #45
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: glasgow, scotland
Posts: 356
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Kosh
Why do we have to refresh your memory? You're the one that's the Christian! You should know this stuff!

Now, if Jesus was the result of a virgin birth, then what's the point of tracing his lineage through Joseph? Your entire claim to his supernatural nature rests on Joseph having nothing to do with the dirty deed.
Just admitting I don't know everything!

As Joseph was the male, his whole family would be considered to be of David's line notwithstanding the miraculous circumstances of Jesus's birth.


malookiemaloo
malookiemaloo is offline  
Old 02-25-2003, 04:14 AM   #46
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 408
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by malookiemaloo

Must do a study on this now!!

Just admitting I don't know everything!

malookiemaloo

Malookiemaloo,

You're doing just fine. It's refreshing to read a non-dogmatic Christian wanting to learn. With your attitude you just might make it all the way to freedom from the evil of religion. I wish you well.

Best,
Clarice
Clarice O'C is offline  
Old 02-25-2003, 04:41 AM   #47
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: glasgow, scotland
Posts: 356
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Clarice O'C
Malookiemaloo,

You're doing just fine. It's refreshing to read a non-dogmatic Christian wanting to learn. With your attitude you just might make it all the way to freedom from the evil of religion. I wish you well.

Best,
Clarice
Thank you. but I need more help.

I'm under the cosh on the BC & A ''Magnus55 take the prophecy challenge!!'

cheers,


malookiemaloo
malookiemaloo is offline  
Old 02-25-2003, 05:12 AM   #48
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: southeast
Posts: 2,526
Cool Changing the Meaning

Quote:
Originally posted by malookiemaloo
As I recall, one gospel traces Jesus through Mary's line, another, Joseph's.
Hi malookie,

Actually, both genealogies for Jesus are pretty explicit, they name Joseph and his father and his grandfather, etc.

If you want to claim that one of them applies to Mary, then you are changing the wording to have a meaning that is different that what is written. Is re-wording the Bible to change it’s meaning fair game?

A genealogy that follows the mother’s line does not exist for the ancient Jews. They always traced the father, nothing else. The ancient Jews were not aware of the human egg, they thought that man provided the seed and woman provided nothing but a place for it to grow. Therefore, the maternal line of descent was meaningless.

Also, Mary was a Levite, she wasn’t from the line of David. In one of the birth narratives, there is a reference to Mary’s cousin, Elizabeth, who was a Levite.

Personally, I think both genealogies were fabrications, designed to fit Jesus into a prophecy that he was doing a poor job of filling.
Asha'man is offline  
Old 02-25-2003, 05:35 AM   #49
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: glasgow, scotland
Posts: 356
Default Re: Changing the Meaning

Quote:
Originally posted by Asha'man
Hi malookie,

Actually, both genealogies for Jesus are pretty explicit, they name Joseph and his father and his grandfather, etc.

If you want to claim that one of them applies to Mary, then you are changing the wording to have a meaning that is different that what is written. Is re-wording the Bible to change it’s meaning fair game?

A genealogy that follows the mother’s line does not exist for the ancient Jews. They always traced the father, nothing else. The ancient Jews were not aware of the human egg, they thought that man provided the seed and woman provided nothing but a place for it to grow. Therefore, the maternal line of descent was meaningless.

Also, Mary was a Levite, she wasn’t from the line of David. In one of the birth narratives, there is a reference to Mary’s cousin, Elizabeth, who was a Levite.

Personally, I think both genealogies were fabrications, designed to fit Jesus into a prophecy that he was doing a poor job of filling.
Hi!

Thanks for refreshing my memory. I am e-mailing from my office but my Bibles are at home!

Genealogies a fabrication? I suppose it's all down to belief.

However, am I right i saying that it was a feature of Jewish life that people were always able to trace themselves back to Abraham?


malookiemaloo
malookiemaloo is offline  
Old 02-25-2003, 07:27 AM   #50
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
Default Re: Re: Changing the Meaning

Quote:
Originally posted by malookiemaloo
Hi!

Thanks for refreshing my memory. I am e-mailing from my office but my Bibles are at home!
The Unbound Bible

Quote:


Genealogies a fabrication? I suppose it's all down to belief.
Actually, this particular one is just based on common sense, logic, and a little research.

Quote:
[qb]

However, am I right i saying that it was a feature of Jewish life that people were always able to trace themselves back to Abraham?
[/B]
I guess don't see what this has to do with the topic, ie, Jesus' lineage to David.

Once again I have to ask, if Jesus was the son of God, and the result of a virgin birth and immaculate conception, then why would you try to trace his lineage to David back through Joseph, who had NOTHING to do with it?
Kosh is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:17 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.