FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-18-2002, 08:44 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Los Angeles Area
Posts: 1,372
Exclamation Verdict: Nickelodeon's My Family is Different

So what did you folks think about this show? After hearing Falwell speak about how it's wrong to hate, I said to the screen, "Speak for yourself fatty."

I liked how that one religious teen in the back seemed to want to scream, "Faggotry is wrong!" His hatred was too thinly veiled.

Overall though, it was fairly balanced, but they never went too deep into why people think homosexuality is wrong. Ho-hum.
fando is offline  
Old 06-18-2002, 08:58 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 24,524
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by fando:
<strong>
Overall though, it was fairly balanced, but they never went too deep into why people think homosexuality is wrong. Ho-hum.</strong>
I don't think there are well-understood reasons. Also, it's very hard to present the "reasons" without giving them substantial blessing - which would be harmful.
seebs is offline  
Old 06-19-2002, 04:14 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: St Louis area
Posts: 3,458
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by fando:
<strong>So what did you folks think about this show? After hearing Falwell speak...</strong>
It amazes me why the media gives that guy any attention whatsoever.
MortalWombat is offline  
Old 06-19-2002, 07:17 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: North America
Posts: 1,624
Post

I found out about the show because I was watching CNN earlier in the day. They had Ellerman (the producer) and Falwell doing a face-off discussion. The footage of Falwell had been done and sent to Ellerman without Falwell having seen the actual program until it was broadcast. On the CNN program, several hours in advance of the show, he openly criticized it as "promoting the homosexual agenda" even though he admitted he hadn't seen it.

I watched the show and I also thought it to be balanced, although they probably should've had at least one token Christian adult to balance out the three gay adults. However the opinions given by the Christian kids more than sufficed to cover their religious viewpoint.

Now the program was about tolerance and respect for kids who were the children of gay parents. Falwell in his quip makes the point that the kids are not to be held responsible for the actions of the parents. Does this not contradict the Bible and the concept of original sin? I mean the entire book is full of instances of God bringing punishment down on succesive generations of hapless victims for the sins of the parents.

As for CNN--I'm beginning to wonder why they always seem to have Fallwell and Buchanan on tap so readily. It seems to me they hardly ever interview any other clergy when some religious issue comes up, with the possible exception of some Catholics recently. I have also deteced a definitely conservative, pro-Enron, and anti-Palestinian undercurrent to some of their programming, especially "Lou Dobbs Money Line".
Seeker630 is offline  
Old 06-19-2002, 07:27 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 2,362
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by seebs:
<strong>

I don't think there are well-understood reasons. </strong>
I think the reasons are perfectly well-understood -- Two guys going at it is gross, and the ancient Isrealites projected their discomfort with the image onto their god-king. The reason is stupid, but well-understood.

Now why do you think that the OT is (mostly) silent on the topic of lesbians?

m.

m.
Undercurrent is offline  
Old 06-19-2002, 02:02 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Alaska, USA
Posts: 1,535
Arrow

Quote:
Originally posted by Seeker630:
Ellerman (the producer)...
Linda Ellerbee. Whatever.
Grumpy is offline  
Old 06-19-2002, 03:19 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lancaster, OH
Posts: 1,792
Post

Here's my local paper's story;
<a href="http://www.lancastereaglegazette.com/news/stories/20020619/topstories/57968.html" target="_blank">Lancaster Eagle-Gazette</a>

It is so typical of them to generalize e.g.,"local residents had no idea". The reporter can't find one resident who thought the show was worthwhile?

This is the same lady who asked me anopinion about gay boy scouts. I told her I supported thembut that I was an Atheist and I wish she would include their side of the story.

She told me she "would pray for me"! Very professional.
GaryP is offline  
Old 06-19-2002, 11:18 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 625
Post

Is Nickelodeon going to run the show again? I missed it .

[ June 20, 2002: Message edited by: Sephiroth ]</p>
Sephiroth is offline  
Old 06-20-2002, 07:10 AM   #9
CX
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portlandish
Posts: 2,829
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Michael:
<strong>

I think the reasons are perfectly well-understood -- Two guys going at it is gross, and the ancient Isrealites projected their discomfort with the image onto their god-king. The reason is stupid, but well-understood.

Now why do you think that the OT is (mostly) silent on the topic of lesbians?

m.

m.</strong>

Yeah but how did that start. Who decided two guys going at it was gross? I don't find it particularly erotic, but I don't find it gross either. And why is it that guys have no problem watching 2 girls go at it? I suppose it all comes down to the fact that penises are inherently ugly as hell and guys have hairy asses.
CX is offline  
Old 06-20-2002, 07:25 AM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 177
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by GaryP:
<strong>Here's my local paper's story;
<a href="http://www.lancastereaglegazette.com/news/stories/20020619/topstories/57968.html" target="_blank">Lancaster Eagle-Gazette</a>
</strong>
I've heard the same attitude expressed in this article from many of the major conservative comentators. They say the material is inappropriate for young viewers (5-7 year olds). But aren't these the same people that have been crying over parent responsibility? What parent is not monitoring what their 5 year old is watching on TV at 9:00 PM?

I watched most of the show and found it rather dull. I guess I was expecting a serious treatment of the issues. I should have known better. It was basically two groups of kids saying:

"Families with gay parents are just as loving as 'normal' families."

or

"Homosexuality is wrong because that's what the Bible says."

The kids pretty much said the same thing over and over again - I found it very repetitive. But then again, the show was targeted at kids.
MassAtheist is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:23 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.