Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Plump-DJ · 01-30-2002, 08:54 AM

i wasn't really making an argument. I was simply asking what you guys think of the evidental status of these coincidences. For or against?

As for Mr Stegner, i don't know what constitutes tight? Some of them, for example the Cosmo Constant (as calculated by Mr Hawking) needs to be "fine tuned" (note the ""

) to some stupidly high degree. 1 Part in 10 to the power of 126 or something similar. I'd be interested in reading up on Mr Stegner's possible wordls.

Plump-DJ · 01-30-2002, 08:57 AM

Whoops! This was supposed to be in the "Books on The Design Arugment" Thread!

Can someone move it over?

pug846 · 01-30-2002, 09:13 AM

Just copy and paste your posts made in this post into the other one - I'll delete this thread when you do.

Thanks.

01-30-2002, 08:54 AM	#1
Plump-DJ Regular Member Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Oztralia (Aussie Aussie Aussie) Posts: 153	Well.. i wasn't really making an argument. I was simply asking what you guys think of the evidental status of these coincidences. For or against? As for Mr Stegner, i don't know what constitutes tight? Some of them, for example the Cosmo Constant (as calculated by Mr Hawking) needs to be "fine tuned" (note the "" ) to some stupidly high degree. 1 Part in 10 to the power of 126 or something similar. I'd be interested in reading up on Mr Stegner's possible wordls.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

01-30-2002, 08:57 AM	#2
Plump-DJ Regular Member Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Oztralia (Aussie Aussie Aussie) Posts: 153	Whoops! This was supposed to be in the "Books on The Design Arugment" Thread! Can someone move it over?

01-30-2002, 09:13 AM	#3
pug846 Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Somewhere Posts: 1,587	Just copy and paste your posts made in this post into the other one - I'll delete this thread when you do. Thanks.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.