FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-19-2002, 09:27 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO.
Posts: 1,100
Post

The idea of sacrificing a life to obtain favor from, or propitiate a deity is an extremely common supernatural belief, and has been a feature, to some degree, of virtually every form of religion in the world. The whole concept lacks logical coherency. Does it really make sense for any deity to require the suffering or death of the innocent, in order to mitigate the sins of the guilty? And, as Christians believe, if we are all sinners and deserving of death, why should God be appeased by the sacrifice of one considered to be sinless? I think all these ideas are basically atavistic remnants of our primitive, tribal past.
JerryM is offline  
Old 07-19-2002, 10:45 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Indianapolis area
Posts: 3,468
Post

While interesting, this discussion of the finer points of Xian theology has no bearing on the Existence of God(s), IMO. Off to Misc. Religion.
Pomp is offline  
Old 07-19-2002, 11:25 AM   #13
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 167
Post

I have heard this before elsewhere.

Much of the impact of Jesus' death is lost by the fact that he knew he was going to be resurrected again.

This conundrum has caused some to say that "Jesus was mildly inconvenienced for your sins."

FreeToThink is offline  
Old 07-19-2002, 11:42 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hull UK
Posts: 854
Post

Technos:
Quote:
Only if a perfect deity did exist, only if a god existed in the first place. Christians are taught this kind of thing before they know how to read, indoctrinated into christianity with no knowledge of the world outside of it, ignorant to all other religions, uninformed or misinformed about culture and sociology, etc. It's not like these things are explained to them or questioned with any valid interest in addressing the 'mystery' at hand.
Some people convert to Christianity after consideration of the facts and the application of their reason.
AJ113 is offline  
Old 07-19-2002, 12:10 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Yes, I have dyslexia. Sue me.
Posts: 6,508
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by FreeToThink:
<strong>

This conundrum has caused some to say that "Jesus was mildly inconvenienced for your sins."

</strong>
I'd never heard that one before! ROFL

That's a t-shirt!
Koyaanisqatsi is offline  
Old 07-19-2002, 06:47 PM   #16
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 68
Post

I'll try to answer your question, although I'm no theologian.

God does not dwell in the presence of sin. Humans, in their sinful state, cannot go to heaven because God will not stand in the presence of their sin. When Jesus died on the cross the sins of the world went to hell with him. When he was resurrected the sins of men were still in hell. Through his death humans can now go to heaven because their sins are in hell and out of God's sight. He died in a bloody way because, according to Leviticus, blood is necessary to forgive sins.
Jayman is offline  
Old 07-20-2002, 05:52 AM   #17
JL
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mawkish Virtue, NC
Posts: 151
Post

Jayman, don't take my bluntness as hostility, but I think this is the sort of circular reasoning Technos suggested. While sighting Biblical requirements and justifications makes perfect sense within the framework of Christianity, offering these reasons to atheists ammounts to saying "God did this because God said that He had to."
JL is offline  
Old 07-20-2002, 09:21 AM   #18
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 68
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by JL:
<strong>Jayman, don't take my bluntness as hostility, but I think this is the sort of circular reasoning Technos suggested. While sighting Biblical requirements and justifications makes perfect sense within the framework of Christianity, offering these reasons to atheists ammounts to saying "God did this because God said that He had to."</strong>
I think my "solution" begs the question: why does God need the shedding of blood to forgive sins? I think my answer takes the multiple questions of the first post and shows that it comes down to one question. So it's progress. However, I'm clueless as to why God needs the shedding of blood to forgive sins.
Jayman is offline  
Old 07-20-2002, 11:45 AM   #19
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not in Kansas.
Posts: 199
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Jayman:
<strong>I think my "solution" begs the question: why does God need the shedding of blood to forgive sins? I think my answer takes the multiple questions of the first post and shows that it comes down to one question. So it's progress. However, I'm clueless as to why God needs the shedding of blood to forgive sins.</strong>
Wouldn't that be a weakness on the part of God though? - "Needs the shedding of blood to forgive sins."
As you yourself seem to have admitted when you said "I'm clueless as to why...", there seems to be no logical necessity for this to be the case. It would therefore seem to be a limitation on his supposed omnipotence.
not a theist is offline  
Old 07-20-2002, 11:53 AM   #20
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not in Kansas.
Posts: 199
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by FreeToThink:
<strong>I have heard this before elsewhere.

Much of the impact of Jesus' death is lost by the fact that he knew he was going to be resurrected again.

This conundrum has caused some to say that "Jesus was mildly inconvenienced for your sins."

</strong>
Let me just play Devil's advocate here.

If God is so important of a personage as the Christian religion makes him out to be, if he has so much magnificence and grandeur, then isn't even "mildly inconvenienced" a great sacrifice relative to humans? Wouldn't that be the equivalent of say...having a finger broken to save a dust mite?
not a theist is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:41 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.