Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-19-2002, 09:30 PM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 633
|
The chaplins give you a confidentiality that does not exist elsewhere. It is more then common for military members to have talks with the chaplins that are off records. From discussing depression to drug abuse, a chaplin is a free source of advice and comfort.
Liquidrage, You're right and I agree there should be some sort of secular equivalent. Unfortunately, you're right about the counseling posing problems for one's career, including for starters, one's security clearance. |
10-22-2002, 08:27 AM | #42 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 6,471
|
Quote:
My boot camp was back in the Stone Age. I'd have thought that the government would recognize that there are many legit reasons a person might seek professional mental help or counseling--such as depression or marriage problems--without endangering his security clearance. But from what I understand, the security clearance is automatically suspended if you visit mental health for any reason, then they decide whether to reinstate it or not. So you have these choices: the chaplain (who may or may not keep your concerns confidential--I've heard stories to that effect too, CipherGirl), a bartender, or lose your security clearance. And we wonder why the military has such a huge DUI problem.... d |
|
10-22-2002, 11:11 AM | #43 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 253
|
Quote:
1) You can't have the entire chaplain corps deployed overseas all the time, so this gives you a stateside rotation. 2) Civilian preachers will not be in a position to understand the nature of the military mission and may not be as good at counselling military personnel. 3) Not everyone on a base, even Stateside, has the freedom to leave the base at will. You still would need on-base chaplains to cover this problem. |
|
10-25-2002, 12:21 PM | #44 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 6,471
|
Thanks, Skydancer. I think 1 and 3 have merit. Jury's still out on 2.
d |
10-28-2002, 08:32 PM | #45 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 1,358
|
Quote:
|
|
10-29-2002, 08:52 AM | #46 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 312
|
Quote:
The Chaplain is a soldier, so it's not like we're paying a non-combatant to sit around and talk about God. It might be difficult for many atheists, especially the Angry Atheists(tm) to understand fully, but the majority of military personnel have some belief in a spiritual essence, and need reassurance in that regard before they head out to the field to be shot at by unfriendly types. Without such reassurance, morale drops, effectiveness drops, and the military fails to accomplish its mission. Not only does having a chaplain not interfere with the troops' missions, it increases the likelyhood that those missions are accomplished successfully. It would affect fewer people and address fewer morale issues for all the atheists to be kicked out of the military than for all the chaplains to be kicked out of the military. Considering the military is what lets me sleep safely at night, I don't care *what* they do, so long as their jobs gets done properly. My taxes pay for my safety, and whatever ensures my safety bin the most optimal manner when it comes to the military, I happily support. There are more important military matters to be fussing about than this. Any one of you at any time could be declared an enemy combatant and held indefinitely without trial. That's a military procedure that deserves our efforts in fighting. Not the presence of soldiers who make other soldiers feel more comfortable about facing death. |
|
10-29-2002, 09:11 AM | #47 | |
Honorary Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In the fog of San Francisco
Posts: 12,631
|
Quote:
My impression is that chaplains were non-combatants like medics. But then I've never been in the service and could be mistaken. At least the medic is out there saving someone's life (or attempting to do so). Hands that heal vs lips that pray, etc. cheers, Michael |
|
10-30-2002, 04:44 AM | #48 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
|
If the lack of chaplains to provide justification and reassurance (that fighting behaviours are okay & What God Wants You To Do) would lead to doubts & diminished "morale" and less effectiveness of the obedient & unquestioning soldiery ..... Hey; think about that. Chaplains are there to prove to our human implements that (as all militaries know) "GOTT MIT UNS". What loyal redbloodied Uhmerkin could find fault w/ that?
|
10-31-2002, 03:29 AM | #49 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Speaking of chaplains, look at what I found over at the new U.S. Senate website:
Quote:
[ October 31, 2002: Message edited by: atheist_in_foxhole ] |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|