Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Ojuice5001 · 03-08-2002, 08:14 PM

I just won an argument with a Christian over on apologetics.org. His initials are KT. He seems to accept all the traditional arguments for the Supreme God, including Pascal's Wager (as in this thread) and the Ontological Argument. I had better points than he about Pascal's Wager and the polytheism-monotheism debate.

<a href="http://www.kipertek.com/cgi-bin/wsmbb/wsmbb.cgi?RT+ZODWHEYOVO/XXNDJATSSS+900+10+apologetic+102.902" target="_blank">Here is a link.</a>

He has presumably read my last post, since he has posted some stuff since then. Both of his responses to me consisted of one or two sentences. I think it's clear that I had a better case than him. Score one for Jupiter!

[ March 08, 2002: Message edited by: Ojuice5001 ]

[ March 09, 2002: Message edited by: Ojuice5001 ]</p>

Ojuice5001 · 03-08-2002, 08:33 PM

Don't think I'm picking on apologetics.org. It's a great site. I'm just saying that the case for Roman paganism is stronger than most people think. I just point this out because, hey, the Religo Romana needs all the help I can give it in being considered an option, and the true option.

whouprog · 03-08-2002, 10:51 PM

Quote:

It is impossible to imagine the universe run by a wise, just and omnipotent God, but it is quite easy to imagine it run by a board of gods. If such a board actually exists it operates precisely like the board of a corporation that is
losing money.

-- from Minority Report: H. L. Mencken's Notebooks (1956).

03-08-2002, 08:14 PM	#1
Ojuice5001 Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: A city in Florida that I love Posts: 3,416	My arguments stump a monotheist I just won an argument with a Christian over on apologetics.org. His initials are KT. He seems to accept all the traditional arguments for the Supreme God, including Pascal's Wager (as in this thread) and the Ontological Argument. I had better points than he about Pascal's Wager and the polytheism-monotheism debate. <a href="http://www.kipertek.com/cgi-bin/wsmbb/wsmbb.cgi?RT+ZODWHEYOVO/XXNDJATSSS+900+10+apologetic+102.902" target="_blank">Here is a link.</a> He has presumably read my last post, since he has posted some stuff since then. Both of his responses to me consisted of one or two sentences. I think it's clear that I had a better case than him. Score one for Jupiter! [ March 08, 2002: Message edited by: Ojuice5001 ] [ March 09, 2002: Message edited by: Ojuice5001 ]</p>

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

03-08-2002, 08:33 PM	#2
Ojuice5001 Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: A city in Florida that I love Posts: 3,416	Don't think I'm picking on apologetics.org. It's a great site. I'm just saying that the case for Roman paganism is stronger than most people think. I just point this out because, hey, the Religo Romana needs all the help I can give it in being considered an option, and the true option.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.