FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-18-2002, 08:17 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA
Posts: 1,242
Post For Vanderzyden: Things the Bible gets Wrong

Seeing as Vanderzyden appears to have abandoned the <a href="http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=58&t=001553" target="_blank">Evolutionary Theory and Medicine</a> thread, before he could respond to schalldampfer's single example of something the Bible gets wrong, I thought I'd give a few examples. They're all real chestnuts, but what the hell.

So, here goes.

1) Hares chew the cud. (Leviticus 11:6)

2) Bats are birds. (Leviticus 11:19 and Deuteronomy 14:18)

3) Insects have four legs. (Leviticus 11:23)

4) Some birds have four legs. (Leviticus 11:20)

5) Genetics can be altered by looking at sticks. (Genesis 30:37-39)

6) The cockatrice is a snake that can kill you by looking at you. (Isaiah 11:8)

There are, of course, many, many more things the Bible gets wrong, but this is a start. I'm sure Vanderzyden will respond by saying that "the Bible isn't a science book", but he initiated this with his remark:

Quote:
Originally posted by Vanderzyden:<strong>

Again you insinuate that the Bible is in error. Care to substantiate that?</strong>
[ October 18, 2002: Message edited by: Jeremy Pallant ]</p>
Jeremy Pallant is offline  
Old 10-18-2002, 08:22 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,125
Post

Along with the cockatrices, inerrantists have to swallow their pride and declare belief in unicorns, giants, dragons, etc.
Bible Humper is offline  
Old 10-18-2002, 08:32 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA
Posts: 1,242
Post

Indeed. Let us not forget satyrs also. (Isaiah 34:13)
Jeremy Pallant is offline  
Old 10-18-2002, 08:36 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,162
Post

Nor do dead men walk:

1 Corinthians 15:12
Now if Christ be preached that he rose from the dead, how say some among you that there is no resurrection of the dead?

But you gotta' give them goatherders credit - they do clarifiy:

15:13
But if there be no resurrection of the dead, then is Christ not risen:

15:14
And if Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain, and your faith is also vain.
Blinn is offline  
Old 10-18-2002, 09:18 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Silver City, New Mexico
Posts: 1,872
Post

One of my favorites is II Chronicles 4:2.

Quote:
Also he made a molten sea of ten cubits from brim to brim, round in compass, and five cubits the height thereof; and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about.
These dimensions are physically impossible (unless pi = 3). Now, if the Bible was written by bronze age goat herders, I'd say that the circumference of 30 cubits given a diameter of 10 cubits was a fair estimate. But for a book that is supposed to be divinely inspired, they are off by over 1.4 cubits. It looks like god doesn't know much about biology, and he isn't very good at math either.
wade-w is offline  
Old 10-18-2002, 09:45 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA
Posts: 1,242
Post

To be honest, Wade-w, the pi=3 argument is one I don't like because the simple answer is that bronze-age goat-herders probably couldn't make it perfectly circular.
Jeremy Pallant is offline  
Old 10-18-2002, 10:50 PM   #7
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Sahara
Posts: 216
Post

Let also not forget :::
Remarkable contradictions

God is all powerful

Matthew 19:26

Quote:
Jesus looked at them and said, "With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible."
God is not all powerful

Judges 1:19

Quote:
Now the LORD was with Judah, and they took possession of the hill country; but they could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley because they had (1) iron chariots.
God is unChangeable

Malachi 3:6

Quote:
For I, the LORD, (1) do not change; therefore you, O sons of Jacob, are not consumed.
God is Changeable

1Samuel 2:30

Quote:
Therefore the LORD God of Israel declares, '(1) I did indeed say that your house and the house of your father should walk before Me forever'; but now the LORD declares, 'Far be it from Me--for (2) those who honor Me I will honor, and those (3) who despise Me will be lightly esteemed.
.....and many more that make the bible a book full of lies and crap...This, i abhor so much..
So let no Vanderzyden or anybody else try convince us of anything esp from the bible....

Best
Black Moses

[ October 19, 2002: Message edited by: Black Moses ]</p>
atrahasis is offline  
Old 10-19-2002, 02:18 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Silver City, New Mexico
Posts: 1,872
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Jeremy Pallant:
<strong>To be honest, Wade-w, the pi=3 argument is one I don't like because the simple answer is that bronze-age goat-herders probably couldn't make it perfectly circular.</strong>
That is a good point. I would counter by commenting that if they made an elliptical sea instead of a circular one, and we assume that the major axis is 10 cubits with a perimeter of 30 cubits, the the resulting ellipse has an eccentricity of .42, which is seriously distorted. I suppose you could then argue that it was an oval shape, not a true ellipse either.

I think that we can reasonably assume that it was at least close to circular, and therefore the given dimensions are still off by a significant factor. This is a good approximation if the account was written by bronze age goat herders, and not divinely inspired.
wade-w is offline  
Old 10-19-2002, 05:39 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4,140
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Jeremy Pallant:
<strong>There are, of course, many, many more things the Bible gets wrong, but this is a start. I'm sure Vanderzyden will respond by saying that "the Bible isn't a science book", but he initiated this with his remark:</strong>
Let's not forget the prize-winning exchange in the <a href="http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=50&t=000635" target="_blank">Why would god send me to hell?</a> thread:

Quote:
Originally posted by Kind Bud:
<strong>They don't even agree with themselves. The gospels contradict each other. </strong>
Quote:
Originally posted by Vanderzyden:
<strong>No sir, they do not. This is a common objection made by those who have not read them carefully nor undertaken to understand the meaning.

Please tell me, in your own words, what is the single most obvious contradiction in the gospels, or the entire NT for that matter. Please demonstrate your case with examples from the text.</strong>
Quote:
Originally posted by Ron Garrett:
<strong>
I gave the Judas example in response to Vandy's inerrancy challenge on the prior page.</strong>
Quote:
Originally posted by Vanderzyden:
<strong>

You are in error, sir. I did not present an inerrancy challenge.

Perhaps you have a unassailable defintion of inerrancy that you could share with us.</strong>
Which eventually led to some very interesting gymnastics about how the two completely different stories of Judas are neither contradictory not mutually exclusive.

I did try asking Vanderzyden what, if anything, could possibly--even hypothetically--be an example of something he would consider a clear contradiction in the Bible, but he ignored my question. Which merely underscores my conclusion, that any error or contradiction can be reconciled if you truly believe, because they must be reconciled. (It also underscores my belief that many Christians have very interesting definitions for such words as "error", "contradiction", and "inerrant", quite at odds with the commonly understood meanings of those terms.)
MrDarwin is offline  
Old 10-19-2002, 08:30 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California
Posts: 694
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Jeremy Pallant:
<strong>

1) Hares chew the cud. (Leviticus 11:6)

2) Bats are birds. (Leviticus 11:19 and Deuteronomy 14:18)

3) Insects have four legs. (Leviticus 11:23)

4) Some birds have four legs. (Leviticus 11:20)

5) Genetics can be altered by looking at sticks. (Genesis 30:37-39)

6) The cockatrice is a snake that can kill you by looking at you. (Isaiah 11:8)

</strong>
General comments:

1. Go back and read these in, say, the New American Standard Version (not the King James)

2. Do not subject miracles to your narrow definition of "science".

3. Read the context.

4. Realize when you are reading prophecy (e.g. Isaiah)

5. Do not unfairly impose modern taxonomic constraints upon the content of ancient texts.

If you are going to be a Bible critic, then you should understand what you are reading. The same pettiness shown in touting "contradiction" claims is apparent here in your topic.


Vanderzyden
Vanderzyden is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:15 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.