FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-27-2002, 11:45 AM   #71
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Starboy:
<strong> As stated elsewhere, being a free thinker is not only about arriving at one’s conclusions freely but holding them freely as well, or accepting everything provisionally. When a Christian is asked to accept JC into their hearts, it is not intended for the acceptance to be tentative.

Starboy</strong>
You seem to be saying that to be a freethinker one has to be uncertain about one's convictions.

That doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.

The point to me is, whether someone is willing to think through new evidence and change their beliefs, if warranted.

You don't have to be uncertain, for that to be possible.

You simply have to be open to taking seriously, new evidence that might change your beliefs. But until it comes along, sure, you can be as committed and certain as you like. Imo.

Helen
HelenM is offline  
Old 09-27-2002, 05:35 PM   #72
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL Reality Adventurer
Posts: 5,276
Post

HelenM, the primary challenge, joy and eventually frustration that we all have to face is that we do not know what we do not know.

Starboy
Starboy is offline  
Old 09-27-2002, 05:52 PM   #73
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Eastern Massachusetts
Posts: 1,677
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Amos:
<strong>

Galiel, I have only heard about him.

To me it is normal that the masses are wrong and it is my ambition to prove that.</strong>
But the Law of Conservation [!!!] tells us that mass can only be converted to spiritism and only *if* Freeman work together to neutralize sinful ambition and normalize proof of existence.
galiel is offline  
Old 09-27-2002, 06:08 PM   #74
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL Reality Adventurer
Posts: 5,276
Post

galiel, your mastery of double speak is most impresive.
Starboy is offline  
Old 09-27-2002, 06:30 PM   #75
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by galiel:
<strong>

But the Law of Conservation [!!!] tells us that mass can only be converted to spiritism and only *if* Freeman work together to neutralize sinful ambition and normalize proof of existence.</strong>
Galiel, you've got me there. I have no answer. I don't know the Law of Conservation, I don't understand how mass can be converted to an -ism, how a Freeman can work together, how sin can be neutralized nor how existence can be proven.

Your whole post is in flux to me.
 
Old 09-27-2002, 06:38 PM   #76
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by HelenM:
<strong>

You seem to be saying that to be a freethinker one has to be uncertain about one's convictions.


Helen</strong>
Helen don't be offended by some peoples opinion of freethinker because there are those who's opinion is swayed by every convincing argument which only indicates that they really do not know anything first-hand but juggle their thoughts between second-hand data and therefore are free to think without prior convictions.
 
Old 09-27-2002, 08:06 PM   #77
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: OH
Posts: 376
Post

I suppose if I have to think about whether I'm a freethinkerthen that in itself makes me a freethinker.
agapeo is offline  
Old 09-27-2002, 08:12 PM   #78
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: OH
Posts: 376
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Starboy:
<strong>HelenM, the primary challenge, joy and eventually frustration that we all have to face is that we do not know what we do not know.

Starboy</strong>
How does one reachfrustration from joy? And how can you know that you don't know if you don't know what you don't know?
agapeo is offline  
Old 09-27-2002, 08:16 PM   #79
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,562
Post

Quote:
HelenM
Yes, but I think everyone is attached to their beliefs.

It's just that not everyone admits it.
You seemed to be attached to this one.

Also since you also believe that everyone who contradicts you is hiding his true feelings then there is no way to prove you wrong.

It's nice to have beliefs that nobody can prove wrong.

Let's see. There are no Christians. Those who call themselves Christians only pretend to believe but actually realize that it is all myth.

[ September 28, 2002: Message edited by: NOGO ]</p>
NOGO is offline  
Old 09-27-2002, 08:19 PM   #80
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Twin Cities, USA
Posts: 3,197
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by SirenSpeak:
<strong>
Why is what we call ourselves so important? Is it just to help give us an identity?</strong>

<img src="graemlins/notworthy.gif" border="0" alt="[Not Worthy]" />

Really, Starboy - if you have a bone to pick with Helen, please try to keep it contained to private messages.
Bree is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:32 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.