FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-10-2002, 03:32 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: St. John's, Nfld. Canada
Posts: 1,652
Post DNA similarity, chimps, humans and dogs.

In talking with a cretinist I pointed out the following.

>>Almost all animals make Vitamin C inside their bodies. It was predicted that humans are descended from creatures that could do this, and that we had lost this ability. (There was a loss-of-function mutation, which didn't matter because our high-fruit diet was rich in Vitamin C.) When human DNA was studied, scientists found a gene which is just like the Vitamin C gene in dogs and cats. However, our copy has been turned off. >>

his response:

Quote:
So they had to keep looking until they found a similarity. Interesting it wasn't found in the chimp which is supposed to be our closest relative. Unfortunately it was in a dog. Cats I like.
Obviously he's missed the point. I was just wondering if it was accurate that the vitemen c gene in chimps was a) identical to humans and b) was also turned off. This seems to be a logical prediction.
tgamble is offline  
Old 05-10-2002, 04:20 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 17,432
Post

IIRC, none of the apes can synthesize vitamin C, and they all share the "disbled" gene.
a quick google search should turn up many references, or someone here can post a link or two i am sure.
nogods4me is offline  
Old 05-10-2002, 05:13 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by tgamble:
<strong>
Obviously he's missed the point. I was just wondering if it was accurate that the vitemen c gene in chimps was a) identical to humans and b) was also turned off. This seems to be a logical prediction.</strong>
Ergaster (Deb) posted a great chart showing
side by side pics with ape/chimp/human genes.
It showed clearly how the mutations were
the same. And yes, you're right, the guy
completely missed it. Look at the "care and
feeding" thread from when Bait was still on
the hook.
Kosh is offline  
Old 05-10-2002, 09:28 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 9,747
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by tgamble:
<strong>
Obviously he's missed the point. I was just wondering if it was accurate that the vitemen c gene in chimps was a) identical to humans and b) was also turned off. This seems to be a logical prediction.</strong>
All primates have this as a pseudogene. This means that humans, chimps, old world monkeys, new world monkeys, and I presume lemurs all have the gene "turned off" (the proper expression is "pseudogene", as perfectly functional genes can be turned on and off during development). Dogs, cats, and all other mammals with the exception of guinea pigs have the gene functioning properly. I seriously doubt that the pseudogene is identical in humans and chimps, given that it's free to accumulate mutations, but I'm willing to bet that it's most similar between humans and chimps, less similar between humans and oragnutagns, less similar still between humans and old world monkeys, etc.

theyeti
theyeti is offline  
Old 05-10-2002, 10:53 AM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast?
Posts: 10,762
Post

Quote:
So they had to keep looking until they found a similarity.
Yep, it's called research.
Godless Dave is offline  
Old 05-10-2002, 11:17 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: St. John's, Nfld. Canada
Posts: 1,652
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Godless Dave:
<strong>

Yep, it's called research.</strong>
he's a creationist. His idea of research is to read the bible.
tgamble is offline  
Old 05-10-2002, 12:02 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,261
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Godless Dave:
<strong>

Yep, it's called research.</strong>

HA HA HA HA HA.

Oh wait, that isn't funny!

scigirl
scigirl is offline  
Old 05-10-2002, 01:14 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: St. John's, Nfld. Canada
Posts: 1,652
Post

Well, now I'm being mocked because I have chimps for relatives. <img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" /> <img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" />

Is there anyone more stupid than a cretinist?
tgamble is offline  
Old 05-11-2002, 04:41 AM   #9
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 221
Post

*sarcasm*
1/2 a cretinist?

Oh, wait, according to cretinism such systems are irriducibly complex, so since a 1/2 a cretinist can't do anything productive for the society as a whole (can a whole cretinist?), there will never, nor can ever be such a thing.

Thus 1 cretinist is rock bottom.
*/sarcasm*
Daydreamer is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:52 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.