FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-28-2002, 05:00 PM   #21
Synaesthesia
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by High Ideologue
Yes I discuss Occam's Razor in Chapter 44 of the House of Ideology Manifesto located @ http://4iam.tripod.com
A passing mention to what is perhaps the most fundamental aspect of rationality: theories that don't work, don't eat.
 
Old 12-28-2002, 06:14 PM   #22
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: P.O.Box 691716, West Hollywood, CA, USA
Posts: 79
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Demosthenes
Ok, if there are things undetectable by science, then we can't ever see them, because otherwise they would be detectable to science, so since they're undetectable, then why do we have to care about them? They can't affect us and they certainly isn't going to affect the universe, so we're better off leaving them out of the equation.


There are also things that are too complex for us to understand by the science of our day and these things do affect the universe. Are we 'better off' leaving these out of the equation as well?

Quote:


All we know about is that there are gravitational influences on cosmological strutures that cannot be accounted for by the visible, luminious matter. Since we can't currently detect whatever is it via EM waves, the best thing we've come up with is the postulated dark matter. Maybe it something else entirely, as some theory have suggested that it may be nothing more than gravity pull of ordinary matter in alternative universes crossing into our universe. It's just pure speculation of course, but it doesn't mean we can just recourse to supernatural explanation whenever we feel like it.
Below is an excerpt taken from Chapter 10 of the House of Ideology Manifesto located at Http://www.4iam.org

From the strictly materialistic point of view of a life form born to play the dual role of predator and prey in a self-consuming biosphere, it may seem ones’ energy, space and time may be better spent studying finite truth and knowledge based on scientifically reproducible discovery then pondering infinite divine eternal mysteries.

Suppose then that we choose to reject all myth and fantasy based on what is possible within the realm of mystery and use only finite truth and knowledge based scientifically reproducible discovery to build our models of self and world. Taking science at face value offers a rather grim model of self and world. This narrow limited point of view would lead us to conclude that our bodies are finite, fragile, frivolous, forgettable, and doomed to the oblivion of disease and death. That is enough to evoke extreme feelings of sorrow, fear, and anger. Without myth and fantasy based on mystery, we would be without countervailing forces of extreme joy, faith and love. We need countervailing forces of extreme joy, faith and love to balance the emotive forces of our minds against extreme emotive forces of sorrow, fear, and anger. We think, believe and expect that if we unbalance our minds with powerful emotive forces of sorrow, fear and anger that would lead to sad, mad, and bad behavior. We expect that sad, mad and bad behavior would hinder our efforts to create, and survive. Thus from both a material and spiritual point of view, our energy, space and time may be well spent building a framework of myth and fantasy based on mystery that when thought, believed and expected to be true unleashes powerful emotional responses of joy, faith and love.
High Ideologue is offline  
Old 12-28-2002, 06:17 PM   #23
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: P.O.Box 691716, West Hollywood, CA, USA
Posts: 79
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by The Naked Mage


When it comes down to THIS, ya know that the theists are in some pretty deep shit.
I am neither theist nor atheist. I am an agnostic and yet I choose to think, believe and expect that there is a divine eternal essence to self and world because to do so for me produces the most powerful emotional responses of joy, faith and love imaginable.
High Ideologue is offline  
Old 12-28-2002, 06:38 PM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: a speck of dirt
Posts: 2,510
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by High Ideologue
There are also things that are too complex for us to understand by the science of our day and these things do affect the universe. Are we 'better off' leaving these out of the equation as well?
Yes, there are highly complex things in the universe, but nothing's beyond comprehension, with the scientific method, we will eventually understand those compex things. Even so with today's science we can easily measure the influences and behaviors of complex things and taking them into account in equations as approximations without ever understanding exactly what makes those things operate. It's the concept of a black box. Likewise we could long measure and calculate the light and energy flux of the sun without fully understanding the details of stars' internals.


Quote:
Would any atheists be willing to agree that if it were possible for things that were intangible and undetectable by any known means to affect or impact the universe in any tangible and detectable way, and if basically everything in the universe was different than it is now, that an entity, likely of the Middle Eastern sand genie variety, might hypothetically exist under our noses, metaphorically speaking, and somehow be able to exert enough influence to be called a deity? Pretty please?
Don't you know how untenable the above position is? How can intangible and undetectable things be able to interact with the universe? In order to interact with something detectable and tangible, you'd have to be also tangible and by implication, detectable in some way. An object that is intangible and undetectable won't be able to do that, hence they won't have any influences whatsoever and by consequence irrelevant to the explanation of the universe.
Demosthenes is offline  
Old 12-28-2002, 06:47 PM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Sundsvall, Sweden
Posts: 3,159
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by High Ideologue
Suppose then that we choose to reject all myth and fantasy based on what is possible within the realm of mystery and use only finite truth and knowledge based scientifically reproducible discovery to build our models of self and world. Taking science at face value offers a rather grim model of self and world. This narrow limited point of view would lead us to conclude that our bodies are finite, fragile, frivolous, forgettable, insignificant and doomed to the oblivion of disease and death. That is enough to evoke extreme feelings of sorrow, fear, and anger. Without myth and fantasy based on mystery, we would be without countervailing forces of extreme joy, faith and love.
I am sympathetic to joy and love, but my own experience is that I don't need fantasy and mystery to achieve these. Also, I don't see human life as frivolous, forgettable, and insignificant. (To whom?) I believe you if you say that you personally need fantasy and mystery.
Eudaimonist is offline  
Old 12-28-2002, 06:57 PM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: a speck of dirt
Posts: 2,510
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Eudaimonist
I am sympathetic to joy and love, but my own experience is that I don't need fantasy and mystery to achieve these. Also, I don't see human life as frivolous, forgettable, and insignificant. (To whom?) I believe you if you say that you personally need fantasy and mystery.
thumbs up

I've always found people who considered human life useless and insignificant to be a depressing bunch and I don't need any depression. Life with happiness and unbounded knowledge's more than enough for me
Demosthenes is offline  
Old 12-28-2002, 07:27 PM   #27
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Deployed to Kosovo
Posts: 4,314
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by High Ideologue
Alright, why take an atheistic position? Why not take an agnostic position?
Classic misunderstanding of what atheism is, here. Atheism does not say that there are no gods. Atheism is simply a lack of belief in any.
Daggah is offline  
Old 12-28-2002, 11:39 PM   #28
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Execution State, USA
Posts: 5,031
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by High Ideologue:

I am neither theist nor atheist. I am an agnostic and yet I choose to think, believe and expect that there is a divine eternal essence to self and world because to do so for me produces the most powerful emotional responses of joy, faith and love imaginable.
But you're still just grasping at straws regardless, friend. The case stands.
The Naked Mage is offline  
Old 12-29-2002, 12:04 AM   #29
Synaesthesia
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm an atheist who believes that there are no Gods.

Why? God is a bad theory. Not impossible, but God is simply a poor form of explanation.
 
Old 12-29-2002, 12:26 AM   #30
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: P.O.Box 691716, West Hollywood, CA, USA
Posts: 79
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Demosthenes
Yes, there are highly complex things in the universe, but nothing's beyond comprehension, with the scientific method, we will eventually understand those complex things.
I agree nothing is beyond comprehension. That something would created from nothing is beyond comprehension. If one believes in something why not believe in everything? Why not think, believe and expect in a divine eternal essence to self and world?

Quote:
Even so with today's science we can easily measure the influences and behaviors of complex things and taking them into account in equations as approximations without ever understanding exactly what makes those things operate. It's the concept of a black box. Likewise we could long measure and calculate the light and energy flux of the sun without fully understanding the details of stars' internals.
Yes we may describe the future condition of any one of the parts contained within a chaotic dynamic system as falling within a range of possibilities often referred to as a strange attractor.

Quote:
Don't you know how untenable the above position is? How can intangible and undetectable things be able to interact with the universe? In order to interact with something detectable and tangible, you'd have to be also tangible and by implication, detectable in some way. An object that is intangible and undetectable won't be able to do that, hence they won't have any influences whatsoever and by consequence irrelevant to the explanation of the universe.
It is also possible for something to be detectable and tangible and yet be incompletely recognized for what it is. That has been the position of many ideological authorities who have preceded me. That is my position as well. Think about the contrast between the limited dimensions of our bodies that grow from seeds in our self-consuming biosphere on our crusted magma globe and the limitless dimensions that may be given our spirits embraced by our souls within our minds. We create our unconscious minds using our seed bodies. We select our conscious minds using our soul spirits. Where our seed bodies are fractal infernal temporal in quality of space and longevity of time, our soul spirits may be divine and eternal. Where our seed bodies are alienation infinite in quantity of energy and denominator of continuum, our soul spirits may be infinite and one. With logic and our scientific methods we have discovered patterns in the chaos that have powerful implications for all matter and energy in the fabric of the known universe. Application of our understanding of these patterns to the problems of everyday life has begun to liberate humanity from ignorance and arrogance of past ages and allowed much of humanity to enjoy a standard of living and a way of life of unparalleled luxury and convenience. However, truth and knowledge based on scientifically reproducible discovery is finite and myth and fantasy based on the mystery of existence may be infinite. We only see from our own finite, fragile, frivilous, and forgettable point of view a large universe of the correct kind to support living infernal feeding entities. Because of this we would logically know next to nothing about the totality of the existence of an infinite chaotic dynamic system if such a system should exist at all. It is not been my claim that I know a divine eternal essence of self and world exists. It has been my claim that I think, believe and expect a divine eternal essence to self and world exists because to do so produces for me the most powerful emotional responses of joy, faith and love imaginable.
High Ideologue is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:44 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.