FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-02-2003, 03:52 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
Default What "kind" is it?

I started this thread at Christian Forums and the YEC's side tracked it to avoid defining "kinds". I had also hoped some other posters could provide examples of weird animals that "kind" is more difficult to guage than "doggie" kind or "kitty" kind, but that didn't happen either.

So I am going to post a few "What Kind is IT?" examples and I hope others will do so as well since I am sure there are many I have never heard of. If we get enough, or if anyone else is interested, I may compile them for an article.


One YEC took a guess on this one and said "snake kind", but since it is a legless lizard, he then had no idea how to classify it. My question...what makes one animal a lizard kind, and one a snake kind, and how would a creationist differentiate between the two? What characteristics are used to determine "kind"?



This is an echidna. It has one posterior opening only through which is eliminates and reproduces called a cloaca, a characteristic shared only with fish, reptiles and amphibians. It also lays eggs like fish, reptiles, amphibians, and birds but they nurse their young like mammals, though rather than having teats, they ooze milk out of special glands.


The platypus shares all the characteristics listed for echidna, and has the added distinction of being one of only two venomous mammals.

The other venemous mammal is the short tail shrew...its venom is very similar to that of a cobra.


So which kind are the above? Is there a venomous mammal kind, or an egg laying mammal kind or are they each their own kind?




These are civets...please any creationist tell me what kind you would put these in! It is theorized the common ancestor of cats and dogs was similar to this animal.

Some other posters presented some great comparisons of chromosomal differences among rabbit species and "horsey kinds" which I will post once I get permission.

Thanks in advance to anyone who will help with more examples, or any creationist who wants to be the first ever to define "kind" and be able to apply that definition to these animals.
Viti is offline  
Old 04-02-2003, 04:10 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: here and there
Posts: 56
Default

I always thought these critters were pretty weird:

Some are fully acquatic, some almost completely terrestrial. Some are oviparous, other viviparous. They can get up to 15-20 inches long. They're caecilians, and they are amphibians. Go figure.
charlie d is offline  
Old 04-02-2003, 04:11 PM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
Default

Thanks for the example charlie, and I hope you are enjoying II! What is that thing anyway, some species of salamander?
Viti is offline  
Old 04-02-2003, 04:15 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Madrid / I am a: Lifelong atheist
Posts: 885
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by LadyShea

One YEC took a guess on this one and said "snake kind", but since it is a legless lizard, he then had no idea how to classify it. My question...what makes one animal a lizard kind, and one a snake kind, and how would a creationist differentiate between the two? What characteristics dare used to determine "kind"?
Don't YECs think that *all* snakes are nothing but legless lizards, thanks to god's curse of the serpent in Gen. 3:14? IOW, I think snakes and lizards are supposed to be one "kind."

Oh yeah, and the Devil created the echidna and platypus to confuse us and challenge our faith.
beastmaster is offline  
Old 04-02-2003, 04:53 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: here and there
Posts: 56
Default

LadyShea:
Caecilians (aka Gymnophiona) are a separate order of Amphibians, just like Anurans (frogs and toads) and Urodela (newts etc). They just forgot how to grow legs, or maybe Noah ran out of space and had to stuff them in the ark's crawlspace for the length of the flood.
charlie d is offline  
Old 04-02-2003, 04:56 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
Default

They're all the same friggin kind: biotes!
RufusAtticus is offline  
Old 04-02-2003, 05:02 PM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
Default

What's a biote?

And I guess I should have specified...What BIBLICAL or CREATIONIST kind is it
Viti is offline  
Old 04-02-2003, 05:07 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
Default

Biota is the taxa that incorporates all of life on the planet. A biote is a member of Biota.
RufusAtticus is offline  
Old 04-02-2003, 05:38 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,058
Default

Platypus (Platypi? Platypuses?) are venomous? Any guesses as to what that is for? AFAIK they are not carnivorous, and don't have much in the way of teeth so how is the poison delivered?
Craig is offline  
Old 04-02-2003, 05:47 PM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Default

A spur on the hind ankle.
lpetrich is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:27 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.