FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-22-2003, 07:10 PM   #1
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 155
Default Letter to my Congressman

It hurts to read this forum. Almost to the point that I turn green and tear off my shirt. Anyway...

Just thought I'd share one of my latest misadventures. I wrote my representative, David Dreier, about the House and the Senate's landslide votes supporting the Pledge of Allegiance in spite of the 9th circuit court's decision. As you probably guessed, I was showing disapproval of the Congress' actions.

So, today I received a response. It seems that no one read my letter. They didn't even read enough of it to find what my opinion was. Here's a quote from the response:

"Like you, I think many people have interpreted too broadly the First Ammendment's restriction against state establishment of religion.The First Amendment was written to guarantee religious freedom and neutrality, not descrimination."[emphasis mine]

What the hell kind of response is that? First of all, they apparently just read the topic of my letter and assumed I agreed. Then they send me this ridiculous statement. Of course, having schoolchildren say that this is one nation "Under God" is perfectly neutral with respect to religion. Removing that phrase is obviously descriminatory against monotheists.

Even though this guy is a conservative, I can't help but wonder what he is smoking.
James Hamlin is offline  
Old 04-23-2003, 03:13 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 1,112
Default

I'd reply to his form letter restating the points you made in your first letter. You may even want to explain (if your first letter didn't) what neutrality means or why taking the 'unger god' part out of the pledge is a neutral stance rather than a discriminatory one. Somehow I do not think 'neutrality' means what he thinks it means. In short make him aware that you do not agree with him. Quote some Jefferson. You may want to add a bit about the author of the original pledge, Francis Bellamy if you can still keep the letter short enough for your congressman's attention span.
Jewel is offline  
Old 04-23-2003, 06:04 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Middle, Kansas
Posts: 2,637
Default

Yes, I got the same form letter from each of my senators. Identical.
dangin is offline  
Old 04-23-2003, 06:11 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 1,112
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by dangin
Yes, I got the same form letter from each of my senators. Identical.
Oh, I see, they just pretend that everybody agrees with them.
Jewel is offline  
Old 04-23-2003, 10:54 AM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 155
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Jewel
I'd reply to his form letter restating the points you made in your first letter. You may even want to explain (if your first letter didn't) what neutrality means or why taking the 'unger god' part out of the pledge is a neutral stance rather than a discriminatory one.
This is what I am going to do. Still, Dreier's lack of interest in the opinions of his constituents is depressing.
James Hamlin is offline  
Old 04-23-2003, 01:02 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Portland, Maine, USA.
Posts: 8
Default

Quote:
Even though this guy is a conservative, I can't help but wonder what he is smoking.
He's addicted to the worst of all narcotics. Religion.
Tyler A DiPietro is offline  
Old 04-23-2003, 03:11 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 1,112
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by James Hamlin
This is what I am going to do. Still, Dreier's lack of interest in the opinions of his constituents is depressing.
I know what you mean. I grew up in NC (land of Jesse Helms). I've nearly had a constant headache from doing :banghead: so much.

Keep fighting the good fight.

-Jewel
Jewel is offline  
Old 04-23-2003, 07:07 PM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 370
Default

Here's the "guts" of the reply I received from Senatoer Maria Cantwell (WA):

Quote:
As you know, on June 26, 2002, in a 2 to 1 decision, a panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found that the 1954 federal law violated the Constitution's requirement that there be a clear separation between churchand state.

On the day of the decision, I joined with 98 of my Senate colleagues and voted on the Senate floor for a resolution expressing support for the Pledge of Allegiance. While the original Pledge stated "'I pledge allegiance to my Flag and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all," after millions of repetitions since 1954, the current wording of the Pledge is a widely accepted expression of our patriotic commitment to American democracy.
...
You will be pleased to know that on March 4, I joined with 93 of my Senate colleagues to pass another resolution expressing support for the Pledge of Allegiance in response to the February 28 decision. I will continue to support our Pledge of Allegiance as the Supreme Court hears this matter.
Just Another Infidel is offline  
Old 04-23-2003, 09:12 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Puget Sound, WA, US
Posts: 1,022
Default

And these are the people supposedly upholding the Constitution.
(I'm from that Murray state also).
I am disgusted. If stupid people could forget how to breathe, we would have no congress, president, or supreme court...

RD
:banghead:
RawData is offline  
Old 04-24-2003, 08:01 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ahhh, I've moved since then....
Posts: 1,729
Default

I don't understand something....(there's alot of things I really don't understand but...)

How did congress gain the authority to change the original Pledge to begin with. I mean, it would be like congress dictating a whole new chapter to "Gone with the Wind".

Later,
ElectEngr
ElectEngr is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:41 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.