FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-19-2002, 11:41 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Elkhart, Indiana (USA)
Posts: 460
Post Sin and Salvation

Joshua,


From the "BaptistBoard..." thread over in "Rants, Raves, and Preaching, Etc.":
Quote:
First, I am very clear, explicit, and loud in my affirmation of homosexuality.
Well, how do you reconcile your stand, and your claim to be a Christian, with the following quotes from the Bible?:
Quote:
"'You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.'" (Leviticus 18:22)
Quote:
"'Do not think that I cam to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. For assuredly I say to you, TILL HEAVEN AND EARTH PASS AWAY, ONE JOT OR ONE TITTLE WILL BY NO MEANS PASS FROM THE LAW TILL ALL IS FULFILLED. Whoever therefore breaks ONE OF THE LEAST OF THESE COMMANDMENTS, AND TEACHES MEN SO, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.'" (Matthew 5:17-19)
Quote:
"[i]Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, Who is blessed forever. Amen. For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. [b]Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is SHAMEFUL, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due." (Romans 1:25-27)
Quote:
The oppression of GLBT persons ranks alongside the repression of women and racial minorities as one of the greatest sins of the Church.
By "GLBT", I assume you to mean, "Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transexual". If so, you are truly confused about what the Bible clearly teaches regarding sexual "orientation" and morality.

Quote:
I have a mild interest in creating the kind of thread you describe, but I don't have a huge amount of time to dedicate to it. I generally only post casually on forums, and then only as a way of procrastinating when I'm sitting at my computer suffering from writer's block.
That's fine. I've got a fair amount of time sometimes, and feel that this is a very important issue for those who are unbelievers. Many are deceived into thinking that anyone who claims to be Christian, or a "minister", actually represents Jesus or the Bible, or truth.

Quote:
In response to your other post, please don't confuse my questions about the nature of sin and salvation with ignorance about what the Bible says on these issues.
Okay.

Quote:
There are, however, some logical inconsistencies in the various scriptural treatments of these issues - and so I recognize some ambiguity here.
None that I am aware of. I used to think so, but that was before I studied the issues carefully, and with an open mind.

Quote:
Not the least of these problems is that of an omnipotent God who is incapable of finding a way to atone for the sins of God's own creation without the murder of Jesus. Anyone who claims to understand that is either a lot smarter than I am or far more skilled at self-delusion.
Or, they are far less skilled at "self-delusion". Actually, the way you phrase it is rather misleading, as you say that the Bible indicates that God was "incapable" of finding a way to atone for sin apart from Jesus' death - Jesus Himself suggests that this was not the case, in His Garden of Gethsemane prayer: "'Abba, Father, all things are possible for You. Take this cup away from Me; nevertheless, not what I will, but what You will.'" (Mark 14:36). God determined that it was BEST that sins be atoned for by Jesus' death - there clearly is no way for a human being to atone for their own, or another's sins, however.

And, the reason why Jesus died for the sins of mankind is quite simple: Jesus was sinless, and not only that, He was (and is) God. Every human being (apart from Jesus) has and will sin, and it is very simple to understand that justice requires that sin be punished, and that if it is not, then justice has not been "served"/"dealt". Because of our own blindness to true holiness, and to the actual "sinfulness" of our own sin, it might be that we find it difficult to understand why any sin requires a punishment of death, but that would be a reflection of our own ignorance of God's holiness and of the depth of our own sinfulness. The punishment was "meted out" to Jesus, thus satisfying God's justice, but allowing God to justly extend mercy to those who acknowledge their need for a Savior, and trust that Jesus paid for their sins. This is the CORE of Christianity, Joshua - to not understand this or to deny it renders one unfit for Christian ministry.

In Christ,

Douglas
Douglas J. Bender is offline  
Old 05-19-2002, 12:16 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 2,936
Post

Douglas,

I find it interesting that you have around here so long, yet you cannot see how others can view the "Salvation Story" as being at odds with an all-loving omnipotent God. But I do not wish to derail this thread.

It seems that you have called Joshua out onto the carpet because of his stance towards homosexuality. Since it does state in the Bible that homosexuality is wrong, I can see where you have a point. But the bible is full of laws direct from God. Do you follow all of them? Specifically,

1) If you were to ever meet a witch, would you kill her as God has commanded?
2) Do you eat pork?
3) Do you eat milk with your meat?
4) Do you keep holy the sabbath (Saturday)?
5) Do you condone killing a woman by stoning her to death because she has committed adultery?

If you do not follow all of these precepts, can you explain to me your criteria for judging God's commandments as either worthy of being followed or not so worthy?
Grizzly is offline  
Old 05-19-2002, 12:52 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 63
Post

Douglas, you raise several questions here. I'll try to address them as clearly and concisely as possible. It should be noted, however, that the questions you are raising are generally discussed in 20 page journal articles - not in a single paragraph on a discussion forum. It's really hard to do these issues justice in this format.

Quote:
Originally posted by Douglas J. Bender:
<strong>
Well, how do you reconcile your stand, and your claim to be a Christian, with the following quotes from the Bible?: Lev 18:22, Matthew 5:17-19, Rom 1:25-27)</strong>
Regarding the Leviticus passage, the vast majority of Christians eat things called abominations in Leviticus with no difficulty.

Regarding Matthew 5:17-19, a few verses later (MT 5:38) Jesus clearly contradicts the Law (Ex 21:23-24); so Jesus' ministry clearly takes precedence over the Law.

Regarding Romans 1, that passage is not a polemic against homosexuality but rather a farily generic contemporary example of debauchery. See Robin Scroggs' Homosexuality and the New Testament for a full treatment of this topic.

Quote:
<strong>By "GLBT", I assume you to mean, "Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transexual". If so, you are truly confused about what the Bible clearly teaches regarding sexual "orientation" and morality.
</strong>

I'll take my knowledge of Greek, Hebrew, and the history of biblical interpretation over your opinion any day. Again, see Scroggs' book or many of the other excellent exegetical works on the subject.

Quote:
<strong>That's fine. I've got a fair amount of time sometimes, and feel that this is a very important issue for those who are unbelievers. Many are deceived into thinking that anyone who claims to be Christian, or a "minister", actually represents Jesus or the Bible, or truth.
</strong>

I feel the same way, but apparently for the opposite reason. It concerns me when backwoods pseudo-theologians and evangelical "scholars" with incestuous degrees from unrecognized universities claim to be the sole representatives of Christianity. For the record, my credentials in this area are: a personal testimony of faith in Jesus Christ, an undergraduate degree in literature and philosophy, a rigorous Master of Divinity (including biblical languages) from an ATS accredited seminary, ordination as a baptist minister (my ordination council was composed of Baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian, and Episcopal clergy - most of whom were seminary faculty), full endorsement as a chaplain, and postgraduate work in rhetoric and literature. My "claims" to Christianity and expertise are well-substantiated. Are yours?

Quote:
<strong>Or, they are far less skilled at "self-delusion". Actually, the way you phrase it is rather misleading, as you say that the Bible indicates that God was "incapable" of finding a way to atone for sin apart from Jesus' death - Jesus Himself suggests that this was not the case, in His Garden of Gethsemane prayer: "'Abba, Father, all things are possible for You. Take this cup away from Me; nevertheless, not what I will, but what You will.'" (Mark 14:36). God determined that it was BEST that sins be atoned for by Jesus' death - there clearly is no way for a human being to atone for their own, or another's sins, however.

You are ignoring several key points here. An omniscient, omnipotent God created a universe in which God would later have no choice but to execute the one perfect human (who also happened to be God in the flesh). Regarding the prayer at Gethsemane, note the wording in Matthew 26:39 - "if it is possible." The implication of Jesus' prayer is that there are some things that are not possible for God. There is also the implication that Jesus' will is not necessarily God's will - which raises questions about what "sinless" means.

And, the reason why Jesus died for the sins of mankind is quite simple: Jesus was sinless, and not only that, He was (and is) God. Every human being (apart from Jesus) has and will sin, and it is very simple to understand that justice requires that sin be punished, and that if it is not, then justice has not been "served"/"dealt". Because of our own blindness to true holiness, and to the actual "sinfulness" of our own sin, it might be that we find it difficult to understand why any sin requires a punishment of death, but that would be a reflection of our own ignorance of God's holiness and of the depth of our own sinfulness. The punishment was "meted out" to Jesus, thus satisfying God's justice, but allowing God to justly extend mercy to those who acknowledge their need for a Savior, and trust that Jesus paid for their sins.
</strong>

So, if God's holiness is the opposite of sinfullness, and if sinfullness includes things like the murder of innocents, how does murdering an innocent satisfy God's holy justice? Likewise, how can God be considered holy and just if God demands the murder of innocents (not just Jesus - look at Jepthah's daughter as well)?

I reconcile this by recognizing that life and death mean different things to a divine being and by also recognizing that I do not need to understand the crucifixion to be grateful for it. That doesn't mean that I need to pretend that it makes sense.

Quote:
<strong>This is the CORE of Christianity, Joshua - to not understand this or to deny it renders one unfit for Christian ministry.</strong>
Fortunately, to my knowledge I am not accountable to you for my ecclesiastical standing. Out of curiousity, is anyone? The core of Christianity is recognizing the sinfullness of humanity and the sacrifice and resurrection of Christ. Recognition is not the same thing as understanding.

Joshua

[ May 19, 2002: Message edited by: Rev. Joshua ]</p>
Rev. Joshua is offline  
Old 05-19-2002, 01:04 PM   #4
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
Post

[quote]posted by Douglas Bender:
Well, how do you reconcile your stand, and your claim to be a Christian, with the following quotes from the Bible?:


Quote:
"'You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.'" (Leviticus 18:22)
Douglas,
How do you reconcile your stand, and your claim to be a Christian, with the folling quotes from the bible?:

Quote:
21:17 (Leviticus)
Speak unto Aaron, saying, Whosoever he be of thy seed in their generations that hath any blemish, let him not approach to offer the bread of his God.

21:18
For whatsoever man he be that hath a blemish, he shall not approach: a blind man, or a lame, or he that hath a flat nose, or any thing superfluous,

21:19
Or a man that is brokenfooted, or brokenhanded,

21:20
Or crookbackt, or a dwarf, or that hath a blemish in his eye, or be scurvy, or scabbed, or hath his stones broken;

21:21
No man that hath a blemish of the seed of Aaron the priest shall come nigh to offer the offerings of the LORD made by fire: he hath a blemish; he shall not come nigh to offer the bread of his God.

21:22
He shall eat the bread of his God, both of the most holy, and of the holy.

21:23
Only he shall not go in unto the vail, nor come nigh unto the altar, because he hath a blemish; that he profane not my sanctuaries: for I the LORD do sanctify them.
Mad Kally is offline  
Old 05-19-2002, 01:13 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Twin Cities, USA
Posts: 3,197
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Douglas J. Bender:
<strong>

From the "BaptistBoard..." thread over in "Rants, Raves, and Preaching, Etc."</strong>
If that's where the inspiration for this thread comes from, that's where this thread goes...
Bree is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:52 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.