Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-12-2003, 02:55 PM | #31 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Exiting Roman Catholic church
Quote:
|
|
06-13-2003, 07:41 PM | #32 | ||||||
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 51
|
Thanks everybody for your advice!
Quote:
may be more complicated now because people move around more. I have a day off on Monday and I will call up local Catholic office here in Australia, but I was baptised back in Europe so I may have to wait until my next trip there. That is why I was hoping to go through their central office in Vatican, hoping that they then advise the local Diocese, I could not find local info on the net. Quote:
imprint and all with me. I only have problem with organised religions. Quote:
go until I was 12 and I had to complete all the ceremonies they have. After that it was my choice and I only went back about couple of times over the years (wedding, funeral etc). I did get caught into pentecostal church about 3 years ago though, I really believed for about 3 month then it took me 8 months to leave the church, but the recovery from the whole thing takes longer because you do get messed up quite a bit in a church. Initially I got attracted by the promise of justice, peace and equality which of course these can not be found in the church especially for a woman, unless you are a macohist. The initial experience of conversion was really weird though, it is like you get a brain fever or as if you are somehow hypnotised, you end up believing anything you get told even if it makes no sense. But it didn't last long with me as I tend to like to know things as they are and not as I or others would like them to be, so I tend to do a lot of research and I'm not afraid of hard questions. I realised that the claims Christianity makes are not true. I was also repelled by the sexism. At first I thought that sexism was due to ignorance and due to the chruch being behind times as ussual. But after researching the situation I realised that the sexism in christianity is very purposeful, consistent, pervasive, sometimes blatantly open and sometimes insidiously hidden - but it is always there. The sole purpose of it is to make & keep women oppresed - spiritually, physically, economically, politically - and the christian teaching is designed to ensure that this happens. They go the extent with which they can get away with in a particular time/society. The extent depends on the conditions in the rest of the society. I was really hurt by it and I still haven't totally recovered, but at the same time I am glad I had the experience because it did open my eyes. I relised that compacency is not enough, one has to be active to prevent the doctrines of the christian church being impsed on the rest of the society. Quote:
Quote:
just made. They serve a number of purposes: 1)They are ambiguous and meaningles to keep the minds of the believers occupied so that they run around in circles trying to understand and find a meaning of something which doesn't have one. While so occupied, they miss the crap that goes around them - which is exactly the aim of the meaningless statements. 2) The meaningless statements give a sense of mystery to christianity, there is supposedly some deeper meaning to them if you just persist hard enough, or believe hard enough - they will then make sense.... So they serve as a carrot on a string, believers run after them trying to understand them which again diverts their attention from the crap that goes around them. 3) Statements like the one you made keep believers on their toes - they are ambiguous with the direction but they imply that the path is trecherous and supposedly filled with danger, it gives the believers a sense of excitement, adventure, importance, but also fear and doubt. The contradictions and ambiguity keeps them treading on a knife's edge, they are never quite sure exactly what being on the path entails but they sure can be damned if they don't stay on the path. Keeping people insecure is the best way to get them in a position where they can be manipulated. Etc. Quote:
women are never infertile and are never treated for infertility? Are you saying that they never have had unwanterd pregnancy? Are you saying that they never go to the doctors? Do you go to the doctors if you break your leg? Or does "this authority with inspried sources" fix your leg miraculoursly? Or are you saying that catholics never break their legs in the first place? What are you saying? pilaar |
||||||
06-14-2003, 10:16 PM | #33 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Yes Catholics can brake a leg but don't you agree that unwanted pregancies are not possible in a "sex for procreation only" policy? Catholics have/should have an extremely high regard for females and are encouraged to always protect them. If you don't like that and wish take charge of your own life so you can be somebody it will be nice to know that at time you were nobody. Yes, fertility problems increased dramatically in our "gender equal" society. |
|
06-16-2003, 05:44 AM | #34 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: A Paladin In Hell
Posts: 114
|
Quote:
I'm not sure what is ambigious about my statement...it is a quote from Scripture...about how following Jesus is a narrow road that is hard to complete, and how most people take the wide road leading to destruction. Seems pretty straight forward to me. Quote:
Is that the "sexist" part of Catholicism that bothers you? Could you be more precise? Are you refering to the brutal murder of an innocent baby because it interfers with your desired lifestyle? |
||
06-16-2003, 07:33 AM | #35 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
|
Just like to comment....
comment, that assuming that neither Amos NOR Paladin is capable of getting pregnant, All-That (including other people's attitudes & practises about pregnancy) are NONE OF AMOS'S NOR PALADIN"S BUSINESS. My position, thus, is extremist if you like. I reiterate that "She(sic) that pays the piper calls the tune." The only control *any* male has, and SHOULD have, over *any* pregnancy, is pre-conception, about WHERE he puts his dick, and what he permits to issue from it. Beyond that , pregnancy & its results & issues are out of his control
|
06-17-2003, 02:52 AM | #36 | |||||||
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
making choices, disasters, making mistakes, sickness, misfortune, loss, pain, joy, anger, sadness - which are all part of life. Are catholics encouraged to protect females from life? Quote:
I always thought I just need to be me. Quote:
Quote:
contradictions (http://www.ffrf.org/lfif/contra.html ). Eg. Exodus 20:15 "Thou shalt not steal." Leviticus 19:13 "Thou shalt not defraud thy neighbor, neither rob him." vs. Exodus 3:22 "And ye shall spoil the Egyptians." Exodus 12:35-36 "And they spoiled [plundered, NRSV] the Egyptians." Scripture creates a very wide road for christians as you can do anything and still be on that 'narrow road'. The existence of large number of denominations holding opposing views also create a very wide road with numerous options for chrisitans. So, how can you justify saying that following Jesus is a very narrow road? Quote:
pilaar |
|||||||
06-17-2003, 04:29 AM | #37 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Selva Oscura
Posts: 4,120
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
06-17-2003, 08:31 AM | #38 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,320
|
Re: Just like to comment....
Quote:
I wish it wasn't any of the man's responsibility, but it is legally it is. |
|
06-17-2003, 02:26 PM | #39 | |||
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
pilaar |
|||
06-17-2003, 03:52 PM | #40 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|