FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-10-2003, 02:10 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 658
Default Poor design?

Hello!

I was just studying gymnosperm life cycle when I saw that when megasporangium undergoes meiosis, four megaspores result. Three of those decompose and only one is left which then develops into a female gametophyte. From what I gathered so far, meiosis always results in four cells. Which then can be looked upon as an evidence of common ancestor, and that such mechanism is ancient. Creator could have circumvented this mess with decomposing. I have not checked Oolon's list of suboptimal design, so if this is already listed I apologize on my redundancy.

Another thing is that my textbook says that the oldest pine (Pinus longaeva) is 4900 years old. If I remember correctly, flood "happened" 2250 BCE. Would pine survive such flood? Those trees should exibit some kind of evidence if flood occured. I am suspecting they are not. As nothing else is.

(edit: corrected spelling errors)
Roller is offline  
Old 07-10-2003, 02:53 PM   #2
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
Default

Quote:
I saw that when megasporangium undergoes meiosis, four megaspores result.
I may be misremembering, but isn't the way that human ova get manufactured along those same lines?
Coragyps is offline  
Old 07-10-2003, 03:35 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default Re: Poor design?

Quote:
Originally posted by Roller
Hello!



Another thing is that my textbook says that the oldest pine (Pinus longaeva) is 4900 years old. If I remember correctly, flood "happened" 2250 BCE. Would pine survive such flood? Those trees should exibit some kind of evidence if flood occured. I am suspecting they are not. As nothing else is.

(edit: corrected spelling errors)
Hi there!

Christians using a flod date of 2300 b.c. seems a "recent" approach. The early church and Josephus (mostly) seemed to rely on a variation of the bible thast placed it in the 4th millenium b.c.

Our english bibles (and AIG for example) use a timeleine that comes from a hebrew variation of genesis that comes from massoretic jews from the middle ages.
judge is offline  
Old 07-10-2003, 03:54 PM   #4
Ad Astra
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Coragyps
I may be misremembering, but isn't the way that human ova get manufactured along those same lines?
Exactly. If I remember my biology correctly, after the oocyte undergoes meiosis I and meiosis II, four cells are created: three small polar bodies (which then die off) and one large ovum, usually refered to as the egg.
 
Old 07-10-2003, 06:20 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 658
Default Re: Re: Poor design?

Quote:
Originally posted by judge
Hi there!

Christians using a flod date of 2300 b.c. seems a "recent" approach. The early church and Josephus (mostly) seemed to rely on a variation of the bible thast placed it in the 4th millenium b.c.

Our english bibles (and AIG for example) use a timeleine that comes from a hebrew variation of genesis that comes from massoretic jews from the middle ages.
Then it seems that this pine tree is just another proof how silly YEC's are
Roller is offline  
Old 07-10-2003, 06:22 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Ad Astra
Exactly. If I remember my biology correctly, after the oocyte undergoes meiosis I and meiosis II, four cells are created: three small polar bodies (which then die off) and one large ovum, usually refered to as the egg.
If this constitutes poor design, I hope I'll get into Oolon's subsection of poor design named: "Everything You Never Wanted to Know About Sex but Have Been Forced to Find Out."
Roller is offline  
Old 07-11-2003, 04:07 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: California
Posts: 646
Default

Yeah, I think human ova are produced in a similar way. One gets all the cytoplasm and the other three get screwed.

'Course from an energetic perspective the "waste" is trivial but its the principle of the thing.


Regarding the oldest tree, it's Bristlecone pine. I've been to the USFS park where they have the 4,723 year-old Methuselah tree, (the White mountains in California) although they don't tell you which one.

Can't find a USFS site but here's another one.
http://www.nps.gov/brca/bristlecone_pine.html

So, the oldest tree is probably not as old as the supposed flood -- but when trees die up at 12,000 feet they take thousands of years to decay. So the dendro people have cored snags and dead logs, and found ring patterns in dead trees that match up with the ring patterns in live trees. By such methods they've extended the continuous ring record back a long ways:

Quote:
Dendrochronology
Pinus longaeva is generally regarded as the longest-lived of all sexually reproducing, nonclonal species, with many individuals known to have ages exceeding 4,000 years. Due to the resinous wood and extremely cold and arid habitat, decay of dead wood is extremely slow, and wood on the ground in some stands has ages exceeding 10,000 years. This has permitted building a continuous chronology of more than 8,000 years, which in turn has been used to calibrate the radiocarbon timescale (the rate of radiocarbon production in the atmosphere is not constant over time, thus the need for calibration). The species has been widely used in dendroclimatic reconstruction and in several classic studies of timberline ecology.
...and guess what, no flood discovered...

http://www.botanik.uni-bonn.de/conif...n/longaeva.htm
Nic Tamzek is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:58 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.