Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-11-2002, 09:00 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 19
|
Speaking in tongues
Please explain the whole on speaking in tongues. I have a specific stance on the subject, being a weak athiest I think it's all a bunch of bull, however, my thoughts have some inconsistencies and I'd like some light to be shown on my theory.
I've been to some Apostolic (ewww!) churches (I try to know my enemies inside and out) and the only point view I can get is a Xian point of view and this view is not explained very well. I'm open to suggestion... |
03-11-2002, 11:33 AM | #2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
It would help if you'd fill us in a little on your theory (is it simply "a bunch of bull"?) and inconsistencies that you see in your theory.
|
03-11-2002, 12:02 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
|
Yes, it is nothing but a bunch of bullshit called glossolalia. Schizophrenics do the same thing.
My mom and her church members speak in tongues. They are in some kind of hysterical frenzy. I'ts amusing (in a freaky way) because the syllables that come out are so funny. If my mom had been at the Shell station to fill up her gas tank it would go something like this: "Shell a la ma la la la, shel o ab ra ka dab la shea da shell O la la" |
03-11-2002, 01:11 PM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,107
|
I can't locate a study I read years ago about glossolalia. It was found that people uttered nonsense syllables that were consistent with the morphological structure of their language. That is, French congregants did not "speak" the same "language" as German congregants. In other words, glossolalia is not a God-inspired Pentecostal language. It's simply the sounds folks think they should make if god were speaking though them. That's not to say they are faking it. They may well fall into a self-induced kind of frenzy. But when they do, they will draw for sounds from their own language bank.
|
03-11-2002, 01:19 PM | #5 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Go to google.com and search for "glossolalia." I did and here are a few hits:
<a href="http://skepdic.com/glossol.html" target="_blank">from skepdic.com</a> |
03-11-2002, 01:36 PM | #6 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Go to google.com and search for "glossolalia." I did and here are a few hits:
<a href="http://skepdic.com/glossol.html" target="_blank">from skepdic.com</a> <a href="http://www.science-frontiers.com/sf051/sf051p15.htm" target="_blank">from science frontiers</a> <a href="http://www.ifas.org/wa/glossolalia.html" target="_blank">The gift of gibberish</a> <a href="http://linguisticspage.homestead.com/skeptic.html" target="_blank">from lingisticspage.homestead.com</a> Here's a <a href="http://wesley.nnu.edu/theojrnl/06-10/10-2.htm" target="_blank">critique</a> of the scriptures that glossolalia is derived from. Here's some kind of <a href="http://kalimountain.tripod.com/glossolalia.html" target="_blank">spiritual new-age</a> gibberish on the subject - complete with instructions! |
03-11-2002, 01:58 PM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
|
Mageth,
I like this part.. Quote:
|
|
03-11-2002, 02:29 PM | #8 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
IIRC, speaking a language you don't know, like the apostles supposedly did, is referred to as "xenoglossia" or sometimes "xenolalia."
[ March 11, 2002: Message edited by: Mageth ]</p> |
03-11-2002, 02:32 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
|
The guy should have said "speaking in goofy syllables" lol
|
03-11-2002, 02:33 PM | #10 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Here's a good quote:
"William Samarin, a long-time researcher into the speaking of tongues, summarizes: "When the full apparatus of linguistic science comes to bear on glossolalia, this turns out to be only a facade of language — although at times a very good one indeed. For when we comprehend what language is, we must conclude that no glossa, no matter how well constructed, is a specimen of human language, because it is neither internally organized nor systematically related to the world man perceives." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|