Magus55

Sorry, my mistake. Was thinking B.C.E, instead of just C.E, so 16th Century AD.

Mageth

Sorry, my mistake. Was thinking B.C.E, instead of just C.E, so 16th Century AD.

This is getting more and more surreal with each post you make.

Biff the unclean

If 3761 BCE is 1 on the Hebrew calendar, meaning the year the world started, then the pre-dynastic Egyptians were leaving us artifacts form one thousand seven hundred and three years (give or take) before the beginning of the world. That's some trick.

Mageth

Magus, when examining the Hebrew calendar, remember that the Hebrew calendar used today is believed to date from some time in the 4th century CE (see Hillel II).

Flynn McKerrow

I have no idea how this

can explain this

Magus55

Or Egyptians didn't exist when people think they did.

Flynn McKerrow

Or more likely, that Egyptians really did exist in 5000 BCE, and the Hebrew calendar is wrong about there being nothing before year 1.

Magus55

Because i glanced over Mageth saying the Gregorian calendar was made in 16th century C.E, so was thinking He meant 1600 B.C.E. I don't use Common Era or before common era, i use Before Christ and Anno Domini, so didn't think about C.E and AD when i glanced over it.

Mageth

Or Egyptians didn't exist when people think they did.

So you expect us to reject all the real, documented, and virtually universally-accepted (outside a few cranks, apparently) archaeological evidence for ancient civilizations in Egypt in favor of the absolutely zero evidence for a global flood?

Like I said, this is surreal.

Magus55

We do have evidence for the flood, you just don't like it because it opposes evolution and the fundie science view of how the Earth formed.