FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-01-2003, 03:07 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: minneapolis
Posts: 705
Default is "morality" in decline

ok. i was talking with some fundies again today, and one of the things this guy was talking about was how without the "christian worldview" more people are having premarital sex, resulting in more STD's, pregnancies, abortions, etc.. and this is a result of not having an "absoulte" morality from christianity.. and that this is why, basically, the US is the most moral country in the world (ha!) because we have more of a christian influence.. blah..

so what's a good refutation to this?
HappyFunBall is offline  
Old 04-01-2003, 03:10 PM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: England
Posts: 2,608
Default

The supposed 'moral decline' has been occuring for decades.

And I don't think it's a bad thing.
meritocrat is offline  
Old 04-01-2003, 03:12 PM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Well, you could start out by pointing out that they are committing a bit of a Non causa pro causa fallacy.
Mageth is offline  
Old 04-01-2003, 03:18 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

You could also point out that teen pregnancy and abortion rates in the U.S. have declined over the last decade, for reasons not necessarily including "absolute morality."

Look here
Mageth is offline  
Old 04-01-2003, 03:43 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
Default

How about the fact that the US being "the most moral country in the world" does not seem to have prevented it having an extremely high rate of teen pregnancy?
tronvillain is offline  
Old 04-01-2003, 03:48 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 7,351
Default Re: is "morality" in decline

Quote:
Originally posted by HappyFunBall
ok. i was talking with some fundies again today, and one of the things this guy was talking about was how without the "christian worldview" more people are having premarital sex, resulting in more STD's, pregnancies, abortions, etc.. and this is a result of not having an "absoulte" morality from christianity.. and that this is why, basically, the US is the most moral country in the world (ha!) because we have more of a christian influence.. blah..

so what's a good refutation to this?
How could you possibly refute the truth? Isn't it horrible that we no longer have slavery, which the Bible endorses? (e.g., Ex. 21:7) Don't you think it is terrible that children who curse their parents are not killed? (Ex. 21:17) Too bad we no longer stone women who are not virgins when they marry! (Deut. 22:20-21, This would also involve killing women who really were virgins, but simply did not bleed for whatever reason on their wedding night.)

There are so many good things in the GOOD BOOK that we have forsaken!

And for those who don't follow the teachings of the Old Testament, have them read Matthew 5:17-20 for the words of Jesus on this subject, so that they might repent from their wicked ways! Hallelujah!


(Note: Many versions of the Bible, such as the King James Version, have 'sanitized' many things. In the King James Version, "slave" is generally rendered as "servant", though when you read the verses about buying and selling them, you can know what a "servant" really means.)
Pyrrho is offline  
Old 04-01-2003, 03:52 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: minneapolis
Posts: 705
Default

yeah, it's one of those things where he's like "well if everyone was 'christian' then we wouldn't have these problems because no one would have sex before marraige" blah blah blah...

also, another guy was talking about the intdoctrination of sex education throughout school as part of the "secular humanism religious agenda" ick. he also said that it should just be up to the parents to teach their kids about sex, and that it should only take 5 minutes!! as for the kids whose parents don't care, well i guess he just doesn't give a shit about them.


also, he was talking about how supposedly "80% of married people who got divorces had premarital sex" wtf?
HappyFunBall is offline  
Old 04-01-2003, 06:30 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Mind of the Other
Posts: 886
Default

Basically, for those people, any change is considered decline. Because at their time they behaved a certain way, the only way they could imagine themselves doing, they consider what was different to be bad. It is true for all traditionalists in general--change and differences are bad, bad, bad, for the society's morals. As if there were no changes that lead to the state of cilivization they were living in at their time.

Ever heard of morality of mores? The idea is that for most people, what was old and passed through the test of time must be good. It is the appeal to tradition--nothing more and nothing less.
philechat is offline  
Old 04-02-2003, 10:10 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: U.S.
Posts: 2,565
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by HappyFunBall
yeah, it's one of those things where he's like "well if everyone was 'christian' then we wouldn't have these problems because no one would have sex before marraige" blah blah blah...
Right, because all those people having pre-marital sex right now are atheists. NOT. Maybe the Christians should work on controlling their own flock, and show us some positive results, before they start trying to control everyone else and claiming that something good will come out of it.

Jamie
Jamie_L is offline  
Old 04-02-2003, 10:22 PM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 430
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by HappyFunBall
yeah, it's one of those things where he's like "well if everyone was 'christian' then we wouldn't have these problems...
I don't waste my precious time with their deranged BS... once you understand the full weight of your above statement, you can cut to the chase and properly refer to them as bigoted supremacists, which they are. IOW, simply replace the word "christian" with most any other group of people and xians will call you a bigot. Why not test it on these fundies you're talking to.
ybnormal is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:13 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.