Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-26-2002, 10:33 PM | #21 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
|
I've been reading some of the threads at Nick Petreley's site -- and this guy is a convert. Yecch.
But at least he's open-minded enough to let some supporters of evolution to post there. |
04-27-2002, 01:47 AM | #22 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
|
Yes, but he avoids answering direct questions. Instead, he quickly veers into terrified sarcasm.
Vorkosigan |
04-27-2002, 07:03 AM | #23 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
|
Nicholas Petreley takes seriously Barry Setterfield's theory of the changing speed of light in a vacuum, c. However, BS had carefully selected what measurements to list in his paper.
Another bizarre consequence is that he's also forced to conclude that several other physical constants have changed, like masses of elementary particles and the gravitational constant, so as to keep many physical quantities from changing their values and producing physical screwups. This "compensation theory", however, makes Setterfield's theory physically meaningless. Here are some examples: A big c in the past might make the Sun be excessively luminous, from energy E = mc^2. However, BS proposes that masses ~ 1/c^2, thus compensating. However, that means that the Sun must have been unable to hold the Earth in its orbit, from v^2 = GM/r This means that G ~ c^2 for r and v constant. Applying this argument to other phenomena eventually reveals BS's theory to be physically meaningless, more like a relabeling of units than anything physically "real". |
04-27-2002, 08:54 AM | #24 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
|
Hey all you unsavory mischief makers, your largely uncoordinated "trollery" is being monitored by a denizen of ARN:
<a href="http://www.arn.org/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=12;t=000146" target="_blank">posted 04-26-2002 07:40 PM</a> Quote:
|
|
04-27-2002, 10:13 AM | #25 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,547
|
What happened to my old pal jeptha at arn? and why are not infidel types the target of 'internet terrorism' either? I bet we are focal points for some bad feelings.
|
04-27-2002, 11:00 AM | #26 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
|
The site (forums included) appears to be down right now.
|
04-27-2002, 04:22 PM | #27 | |||||
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Milwaukee, WI, USA
Posts: 77
|
I've got to hand it to Mr. Petreley. He certainly has a knack for insults:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
04-28-2002, 08:42 AM | #28 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Schenectady, NY
Posts: 45
|
It would seem that the site is back up. They seem unable to carry on a rational conversation. Also, no one there will offer a definition of species yet they all seem very sure that speciation can't occur.
Donald |
04-28-2002, 09:29 AM | #29 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 422
|
Wow. The whole site is down again? Or are people coming from this forum just blocked now? Not only can I not get into the petreley forums, I can no longer get to petreley.org.
Of course, maybe it's just down for maintenance and will be up later. -SK [ April 28, 2002: Message edited by: Schroedinger's Kitten ]</p> |
04-28-2002, 11:06 AM | #30 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
|
I would not be suprised if it were only open in the evening. It's probably running off of Petreley's home box.
-RvFvS |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|