FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-12-2002, 06:30 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
Post Which adaptation(s) do you covet?

Watching the DSC channel at times makes me feel like we really the short end of the stick in exchange for our brains. If you could alter the evolutionary past (or just play around with genetics), which adaptations from other animals would you wish for? Me:

1. Night vision like a cat

2. Muscular like a cat

3. Ability to withstand high force impacts (like ants, etc). Probably impossible with our size though...

4. Ability to climb walls like a spider

5. Photo-synthesis (OK I cheated and used a plant)

6. Fail-safe vital organs. Like multiple hearts (OK, I took that one from Star Trek)

What else?
Kosh is offline  
Old 11-12-2002, 06:42 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA
Posts: 1,242
Post

I think Alan Dean Foster did a short story about humans being "modified" so that they could do photosynthesis. A journalist was kidnapped and treated so he could observe and publicize the benefits. I forget the details. I thought at the time it was a pretty cool idea...photosynthetic humans, that is, not kidnap.
Jeremy Pallant is offline  
Old 11-12-2002, 06:55 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
Post

Do humans have enough surface area for photosynthesis? I think we would need leaves and branches to max out our ratio.

Edited to note: You would also have to get used to being bright green.

[ November 12, 2002: Message edited by: Doubting Didymus ]</p>
Doubting Didymus is offline  
Old 11-12-2002, 07:01 PM   #4
pz
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 3,341
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Doubting Didymus:
<strong>Do humans have enough surface area for photosynthesis? I think we would need leaves and branches to max out our ratio.</strong>
Compare the metabolic rate of a tree to the metabolic rate of a mammal. No way could we get enough surface area to make even a dent in our energy demands with photosynthesis.
Quote:
<strong>
Edited to note: You would also have to get used to being bright green.
</strong>
And frolicking in the sun naked.
pz is offline  
Old 11-12-2002, 07:05 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Kosh:
<strong>Watching the DSC channel at times makes me feel like we really the short end of the stick in exchange for our brains. If you could alter the evolutionary past (or just play around with genetics), which adaptations from other animals would you wish for?</strong>
Depends on what environment you want me to live in.
RufusAtticus is offline  
Old 11-12-2002, 07:15 PM   #6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 473
Post

Pigs have 30 minute orgasms....

How popular would that be?
Camaban is offline  
Old 11-12-2002, 07:22 PM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Post

I'll look outside the animal kingdom to fungi and protists and bacteria:

The ability to manufacture essential amino acids, essential fatty acids, vitamins, etc. That way we could live off of even the junkiest of junk food.

Perhaps also the ability to digest cellulose.
lpetrich is offline  
Old 11-12-2002, 07:32 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA
Posts: 1,242
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by pz:
<strong>Compare the metabolic rate of a tree to the metabolic rate of a mammal. No way could we get enough surface area to make even a dent in our energy demands with photosynthesis.</strong>
Good point. I suppose it would depend on how tightly packed the photosynthetic organelles could be arranged.

True, we would have to go around largely naked, and live in a suitably sunny climate, but I can afford to be blase about that (300 days of sunshine a year).
Jeremy Pallant is offline  
Old 11-12-2002, 07:49 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
Post

Quote:
Compare the metabolic rate of a tree to the metabolic rate of a mammal. No way could we get enough surface area to make even a dent in our energy demands with photosynthesis.
Not even with a massive great canopy?
Doubting Didymus is offline  
Old 11-12-2002, 08:08 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
Post

I should have known better with a bunch of engineers. Ok, suspension of disbelief. Forget the logistics, which traits would you want?
Kosh is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:23 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.