FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-31-2002, 12:18 AM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Exclamation Assuming what one starts out to prove...

This is a common tactic among creationists; simply consider the <a href="http://www.creationresearch.org/belief_wndw.htm" target="_blank">oath</a> that the Creation Research Society's members must agree to (I was unable to find a similar oath for the Institute of Creation Research, however).

But an especially annoying version of that tactic was employed by a certain "Josephus" over at <a href="http://www.christianforums.com" target="_blank">http://www.christianforums.com</a> -- at one point, he claimed that the important question was not whether some evidence was consistent with the occurrence of Noah's Flood, but how that evidence fits in with the occurrence of Noah's Flood.
lpetrich is offline  
Old 05-31-2002, 12:57 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Post

However, I've discovered a similar <a href="http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/about/faith.asp" target="_blank">"Statement of Faith"</a> at Answers in Genesis, and <a href="http://www.icr.org/abouticr/tenets.htm" target="_blank">"Tenets of Scientific Creationism"</a> at the Institute for Creation Research.
lpetrich is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:21 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.