Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-23-2002, 11:22 AM | #31 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: .
Posts: 1,653
|
Would like to third Oresta's second of PITW's first.
|
01-23-2002, 12:39 PM | #32 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,118
|
Human life may be protected in the US, but certainly not fetus-life. The 14th Amendment, is the one that states that all citizens born or naturalized in the US shall enjoy all the rights. Which is a fetus?
And certainly science does not support the fact that festuses should be protected. First, science doesn't even tell us what is important and what isn't. That comes from us interpreting the data. Secondly, a fetus is alive, yes, and it is human, yes, but so are my skin cells. Shall I stop exfoliating? The bottom line is what is alive and what is human is no way to tell who should have rights given by the US Constitution. If that ever happens, in vitro needs to be a lot more available, because I sure as hell don't want to carry a baby around in my body for 9 months and be unable to make decisions for it or for myself because the Christians next door feel they have more of a right ot make those decisions than me! [ January 23, 2002: Message edited by: cheetah ]</p> |
01-23-2002, 08:50 PM | #33 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Rochester NY USA
Posts: 4,318
|
Quote:
Andy (PITW) |
|
01-31-2002, 02:03 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 762
|
I think this is the second stage: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3369-2002Jan31.html" target="_blank">Feds: Fetus Called 'Unborn Child'</a>
Quote: A developing fetus may be classified as an "unborn child" eligible for government health care. |
01-31-2002, 03:54 PM | #35 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: West Covina, CA
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|