FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-15-2003, 06:47 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,504
Default

Quote:
Zetek:
Nah, that's not it. Gawd trained all of those animals to take dumps in the special crapper that Noah built for them. Haven't you seen the trailers for Bruce Almighty yet? Sheesh! Some people...
Yup, and then Noah grew food for all the animals in that fertile poop. It's obvious, once you stop thinking.


Peez
Peez is offline  
Old 04-15-2003, 08:41 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dana Point, Ca, USA
Posts: 2,115
Default

Heh, heh.

I see that socrates has now mentioned honey as a food preservation method. Good to know that he reads more than just AiG, and ICR crap.
Dr.GH is offline  
Old 04-15-2003, 09:39 AM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
Default random thoughts

Quote:
Originally posted by tgamble
The large quantities of food aboard would have invited infestations of any of hundreds of stored product pests (especially since all of those pests would have been aboard)

[...]
Answer:

"By using DRIED foods in airtight containers, or salted food.
Okay, so what did the pests eat then?

Hmm. Dried foods. Hay. Yep, that’d work for the ungulates. But, erm, doesn’t hay get mouldy? Air-tight containers for bales of hay... yup, that’s plausible.

And, um, so what did the bot-flies and the screw-worms eat?

Anteaters and aardwolves... were the termites dried, or salted? Oh I see, there were dozens of live colonies on board...

And it’s just occurred to me: no matter how generous the rations, rations is what the critters must have been on. So what happens when they breed? Now this may not be a problem for pandas, but how did Noah stop the rodents breeding? There’s a pair of everything, remember, so the ark would have contained rather more animals at the end than it started with. How did he feed the burgeoning population? A quick abracadabra with loaves and fishes, perhaps? So, what, halfway through the voyage, he says ‘sorry, gotta cut the rations unless you lot stop fucking?’

I was wondering why no human babies came ashore too, after all, husbands and wives, cooped up together, gotta relieve the tedium somehow (surely they weren’t celebate all that time, and no contraception...).

But then, they were probably too knackered. Didn’t we do a calculation some time of the care-time involved? Something like this:

Call the number of kinds 4000 (surely a bit generous).

Say there’s 10 humans on board (Noah, three sons, plus wives each, plus two for the pot). 400 kinds each to look after.

Suppose just 5 mins care required each day (less for rats and the hibernating ones, rather more for elephants, horses etc, and anyone’s guess what care Argentinasaurs needed).
400 x 5 = 2000 minutes. That, folks, is a 33 hour day.

Okay, what if they slept for just four hours a night? That leaves a 20 hour day, non-stop, or 1200 minutes. Which, rather neatly, gives each kind (of the mere 4000 on board) 3 minutes of care a day. Including moving between pens, fetching the food from the storage areas and uncorking the airtight tubs it’s stored in.

I doubt they had time for a pee, let alone to procreate.

Okay, let’s come at this another way. Let’s be more sensible. Suppose, again, ten people. Suppose they need to sleep, eat, pee and poo.
Sleep: 6 hours a day. Don’t forget they’d’ve been working hard.
Eating: 1 hour for all meals, including preparation and clearing away.
Pee and poo: half an hour. Generous, but put a bit of the spare time towards general communications, organisation and management. They’ve got to know what they’re up to, who’s on washing up duty etc.

So, 7.5 hours taken out of the working day, leaving a 16.5 hour working day.

Now, suppose that an average ‘kind’, in practice, requires 10 minutes a day, to cover all eventualities: cleaning out, feeding, mopping up sick, moving the food within the sea-tossed ark, opening those Tupperware boxes, etc. How many ‘kinds’ were plausibly on the ark?

Well, 16.5 hours is 990 minutes. Divided by 10 = 99 kinds each; ten people therefore could sensibly look after 990 kinds. At one hell of a push.

How many mammal genera are there? How many terrestrial (or otherwise needed-to-be-on-the-ark) families are there?

Cheers, Oolon
Oolon Colluphid is offline  
Old 04-15-2003, 09:59 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Middlesbrough, England
Posts: 3,909
Default Re: food preservation techniques

Quote:
Originally posted by tgamble
I was wondering if anyone knew when salted food became a method of preservation.
Funnilly enough, it became a method of food preservation at exactly the same time as refrigeration and desication. Isn't that an amazing coincidence? To be precise, roughly around about the dawn of time.

Boro Nut
Boro Nut is offline  
Old 04-15-2003, 11:40 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Standin in the rain, talkin to myself
Posts: 4,025
Default Re: random thoughts

Quote:
Originally posted by Oolon Colluphid
Okay, so what did the pests eat then?

Hmm. Dried foods. Hay. Yep, that’d work for the ungulates. But, erm, doesn’t hay get mouldy?
Properly made hay will last several years as long as it's kept dry.
doghouse is offline  
Old 04-15-2003, 01:38 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,504
Default food preservation

Although food preservation on long voyages was, until recently, difficult, it was nevertheless, in principle, possible. To play devil's (god's?) advocate

Simply drying food is very effective for preservation. Salt (when you can get it) and sugar (in honey) can also help to preserve food. How one might keep the atmosphere in the arc dry is anyone's guess, but it could easily have been cool and this would have helped (much like a root cellar). Boiled food in wax-sealed jars would be almost like cans (can you prove that they couldn't do that? ).

Then they could have collected ice that was freed from the ice caps, and made a large cold room. Of course, they could continue to fish from the arc and even harvest edible seaweed.


While I agree that food preservation on the arc is yet another problem for the Noah fairy tale, I don't think that it is worth persuing. It is harder to establish, and there are plenty of other obvious problems with the story (if you will excuse the understatement). If you do wish to go after it, don't forget to work on specific dietary needs (the lack of vitamin C got to many sailors long before they were in danger of starvation).

Maybe water is worth a go as well. I know that rainwater could be collected, but just how much water are those thousands of animals going to drink every day? Given the size of the arc, a lot of rain would be required. Not only that, but a lot of that water is going to end up, um, discarded by the animals. Even if the flood water could be drunk (which would mean that most marine organisms would die), that is a lot of water being brought aboard. Who has bilge duty today?

It is just so stupid, it is sad that we are even discussing it.

Peez
Peez is offline  
Old 04-15-2003, 07:55 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,162
Default



sorry
Blinn is offline  
Old 04-15-2003, 08:49 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,762
Default

Quote:
Properly made hay will last several years as long as it's kept dry.
When it's raining at a rate approaching 100 inches/hour, I'd imagine it's tough to keep stuff dry.
Calzaer is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:30 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.