FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-26-2002, 03:41 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Post Agnos1 asks why we would accept Socrates but not Jesus

Quote:
Originally posted by Agnos1:
<strong>It would be interesting if someone on this board could elucidate how historians have determined the extreme likelihood of Socrates' existence and how that compares, using the same methodology, to determining the historocity of Jesus one way or the other. There should be a mountain of evidence or non-evidence for both figures. Thanks

Ag</strong>
...

Any takers?
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 07-26-2002, 05:00 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast of disorder
Posts: 6,829
Post

How about the total lack of earlier myths/stories that bear striking resemblances to a legendary thinker/philosopher?

Maybe not motive, but certainly means and opportunity.
Philosoft is offline  
Old 07-26-2002, 05:10 PM   #3
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 184
Post

I’m interested in this question too. I’m not a historian, but I remember participating in discussions in graduate school (English Lit, and many many moons ago) about how much of Socrates was in fact just a literary invention of Plato.

So, first, what historians have determined this? How much beyond the mere fact (or relative probability?) of his existence have they determined? Was he actually condemned to death for atheism? Was he actually married to a shrewish wife? Did he teach by using the “Socratic” method? How much do we know outside of Plato’s writings?
Tharmas is offline  
Old 07-26-2002, 05:33 PM   #4
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Left of the Mississippi
Posts: 138
Post

My response to that is simple. Our fate for eternity does not hinge on the accuracy of what has been attributed to Socrates.

Whether or not he truly existed is an interesting historical question that has produced interesting debate. But it's not a life or death question.
Bokonon is offline  
Old 07-26-2002, 05:34 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Alaska, USA
Posts: 1,535
Smile

From what I've heard, Socrates could very well be the invention of Plato -- a fictitious mouthpiece for his philosophical arguments. And you know what? It doesn't take away from Socrates at all. The literal existence of Socrates is not necessary to confirm the validity (or lack thereof) of the arguments advanced in his name.
Grumpy is offline  
Old 07-26-2002, 07:03 PM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Post

I thought, in addition to Plato, Aristophanes wrote a play in which he appears, and Xenophon wrote about him. Aristotle also appears to know of independent sources on Socrates, although he never met him -- but he did know Plato. In any case, what in the history as we have it suggests that Socrates never existed?

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 07-26-2002, 07:23 PM   #7
lcb
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: washington d.c.
Posts: 224
Post

devil's advocate: how many medical missionary clinics, orphanages, hospitals,feeding centers,charity centers have been founded in the name of Socrates? how many in the name of Jesus? French philosopher Servrancxe "to exist supreme is to have maximized the proliferation of one's will upon the world"....
lcb is offline  
Old 07-26-2002, 07:25 PM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by lcb:
<strong>devil's advocate: how many medical missionary clinics, orphanages, hospitals,feeding centers,charity centers have been founded in the name of Socrates? how many in the name of Jesus? French philosopher Servrancxe "to exist supreme is to have maximized the proliferation of one's will upon the world"....</strong>
This is not evidence of anything except the hard work of Christians. Can we get back to the discussion at hand? What to you suggests the possibility of Socrates non-existence?

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 07-26-2002, 07:28 PM   #9
lcb
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: washington d.c.
Posts: 224
Post

i love socrates, i was born using the socratic method! i accept socrates' existence in part because i dont see what anyone would have to gain by making it up.
lcb is offline  
Old 07-26-2002, 07:35 PM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by lcb:
<strong>i love socrates, i was born using the socratic method! i accept socrates' existence in part because i dont see what anyone would have to gain by making it up.</strong>
Nevertheless, one can easily posit a scenario where Plato simply produces him as the idealized form of the Philosopher, in indignant response to the comic figure from Aristophanes. I don't buy it either, but there it is.
Vorkosigan is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:07 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.