Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-27-2002, 07:21 PM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,832
|
Evolution evidenced by ferals ?
Was watching a local program on the introduction of cats to Australia only a century or 2 ago. There was some speculation as to why feral cats had quite different appearances, colourings and builds in various parts of Australia, forests vs arid vs alpine conditions.
It was hypothesised that cats of southern Australia were of European origin while in the north they were more likely Indonesian. But after DNA testing, all were found to be British, imported as pets and as a deliberately (and poorly conceived) introduced mouse-control species. A surprising result of common ancestry given their apparent diversity. Regardless, to the uninformed, Australia would seem to be an even better laboratory than the Galapagos to study short-term evolution, with rabbits, cats, dogs, foxes and so forth, all appearing to have taken only 2 centuries or less to adapt locally to a wide variety environmental conditions throughout the continent. Any truth ? |
10-27-2002, 07:45 PM | #2 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 473
|
Lots.
Other such things are that desert cats can now operate on a low enough water supply that the moisture in the blood of those they kill gives them all their needs, so they're not confined to water holes or anything like that. as just one example. |
10-28-2002, 05:38 AM | #3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 9,747
|
Quote:
Seriously, the plight of native species in Australia is pretty good evidence of evolution all by itself, as shown through biogeography. theyeti |
|
10-28-2002, 05:56 AM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bemidji
Posts: 1,197
|
I don't have much to contribute here other than I think feral animals are really cool. I guess it reminds me of Jack London's "Call of the wild".
I have always been fascinated by feral animals that adapt back to life in the wild like wild pigs and so forth. I know they can be very destructive though, especially in fragile island ecosystems. |
10-28-2002, 09:17 AM | #5 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
I've heard there are restaraunts in asia where they only serve endangered species, so maybe they could take care of some of the rarer indigenous species in Australia as well. |
|
10-28-2002, 12:40 PM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,049
|
"Regardless, to the uninformed, Australia would seem to be an even better laboratory than the Galapagos to study short-term evolution, with rabbits, cats, dogs, foxes and so forth, all appearing to have taken only 2 centuries or less to adapt locally to a wide variety environmental conditions throughout the continent"
An interesting experiment would be to release a 100 pregnant armadillos into the Outback and monitor their spread, environmental impact and evolutionary changes over a period of a few decades. Unfortunatley, no Australian university has taken me up on my offer. |
10-28-2002, 01:09 PM | #7 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
|
Quote:
|
|
10-28-2002, 01:26 PM | #8 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
|
And after what happened with rabbits, would one be allowed to release those armadillos?
|
10-28-2002, 02:11 PM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,049
|
Ipetrich, that is true. However, it was not done under controlled conditions. Besides, armadillos would have a much more visible impact - imagine the whole nulabor rototilled.
|
10-28-2002, 03:59 PM | #10 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
|
I think we should release 16 humans in the Australian Outback and see the ecological impact that happens when they stop being polite and start being real.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|