FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-04-2002, 05:04 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4,140
Post New theory on origin of life

<a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/12/021204080856.htm" target="_blank">Revolutionary New Theory For Origins Of Life On Earth</a>
MrDarwin is offline  
Old 12-04-2002, 05:18 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
Post

Thanks Mr D. I heard a bit on it this morning on 'Today' on BBC Radio 4: a brief interview with Russell and the creationists' favourite (along with Hoyle ), Chandra Wickramsinghe.

I lost reception in the car park, so didn't hear it properly, but one thing to note is that this is a new theorythat Russell has been working on for the last fifteen years...

DT
Oolon Colluphid is offline  
Old 12-04-2002, 07:41 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Just another hick from the sticks.
Posts: 1,108
Post

Very interesting, Mr. D.

The life surrounding the ocean's thermal vents is like none other known on earth. I have wondered if places such as these could have been the 'Beginning.' I'll be watching this research closely and hope I have enough life of my own left to see it to it's conclusion.

Many thanks!

doov
Duvenoy is offline  
Old 12-04-2002, 08:49 AM   #4
Talk Freethought Staff
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Toronto, eh
Posts: 42,293
Post

That's a really cool theory.

Does anyone know how one would go about testing something like that? Is it even possible or would this have to remain in the "it might have happened this way" column?
Tom Sawyer is offline  
Old 12-04-2002, 09:28 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4,140
Post

It seems to me that this theory still faces the same problems as other ideas about the origin of life, and a few additional problems of its own. It still has to explain the origin of self-replicating molecules, with the added burden of explaining how they got into and came together in these crystallized compartments, when we already know that many of the precursors (already fairly large molecules themselves) are soluble in water and can form spontaneously in solution, given the right conditions.

On the other hand, maybe they've come up with a way to evolve life that's possible but didn't occur on this planet, but may have happened on others.
MrDarwin is offline  
Old 12-04-2002, 09:58 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dana Point, Ca, USA
Posts: 2,115
Post

Thanks for the link. There have been many preceeding papers that are consistant with Martin and Russell, and I’ll be interested to see their bibliography. Some that come to mind are:

Amend, J. P. , E. L. Shock
1998 “Energetics of Amino Acid Synthesis in Hydrothermal Ecosystems” Volume 281, number 5383, Issue of 11 Sep , pp. 1659-1662.

Blochl, Elisabeth, Martin Keller, Gunter Wachtershauser, Karl Otto Stetter
1992 “Reactions depending on iron sulfide and linking geochemistry with biochemistry” PNAS-USA v.89: 8117-8120

BRANDES, JAY A., NABIL Z. BOCTOR, GEORGE D. CODY, BENJAMIN A. COOPER, ROBERT M. HAZEN & HATTEN S. YODER JR
1998 Abiotic nitrogen reduction on the early Earth Nature 395, 365 - 367

Cody, George D., et al
2000 “Primordial Carbonylated Iron-Sulfur Compounds and the Synthesis of Pyruvate” Science v.289 : 1337-1340

Huber, Claudia, Gunter Wachtershauser
1997 “Activated Acetic Acid by Carbon Fixation on (Fe,Ni)S Under Primordial Conditions” Science v. 276: 245-247

Huber, Claudia, Gunter Wachtershauser
1998 “Peptides by Activation of Amino Acids with CO on (Ni,Fe)S Surfaces: Implications for the Origin of Life” Science v.281: 670-672

Imai, E., Honda, H., Hatori, K., Brack, A. and Matsuno, K.
1999 “Elongation of oligopeptides in a simulated submarine hydrothermal system“ Science 283(5403):831–833.

Parsons, Ian, Martin R. Lee, and Joseph V. Smith 1998 Biochemical Evolution II: Origin of Life in Tubular Microsrtuctures on Weathered Feldspar Surfaces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 95 (26): 15173

Shock, Everett L.
1990 “Geochemical Constraints on the Origin of Organic Compounds in Hydrothernal Systems” Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere v.20: 331-367

Von Damm, K. L.
1995 “Controls on the Chemistry and Temporal Variability of Seafloor Hydrothemal Fluids” in Seafloor Hydrodynamical Systems: Physical, Chemical, Biological, and Geological Interactions Geophysical Monograph 91 The American Geophysical Union

Wachtershauser, Gunter
2000 “Perspective” Science v.289 : 1308

These would serve the notion, long advanced, that hydrothermal vents and mineral substrates were the locations of the origin of life. I would say that Woese is probably the current “heavy thinker" for pre-cellular evolution.

Woese, Carl
1998 “The universal ancestor” PNAS Vol. 95, Issue 12, 6854-6859, June 9

Woese, Carl
2002 “On the evolution of Cells” PNAS Vol. 99 13:8742-8747, June 25

Ultimately, the question must fall to the geochemists who might find the particular 'life signiture' in some rock somewhere.
Dr.GH is offline  
Old 12-04-2002, 10:09 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Posts: 80
Post

This is very interesting. I've been studying molecular evolution recently, so this is right up my alley. What do you guys think about the Cairns-Smith theory?
Neruda is offline  
Old 12-04-2002, 01:59 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
Post

Quote:
What do you guys think about the Cairns-Smith theory?
The crystal replicator? Well, it is ever such a nice theory. I find myself wanting it to be true, which is dangerous. It looks very nice in theory, but I have found that it runs into a bit of a wall when you need it to account for modern biodiversity (that is, the transition from crystals to replicating organic molecules).

I have never been able to get my head around an evolutionary pathway that would connect crystals to RNA, or any simpler replicating molecule, with each step being both small and beneficial/neutral. That rings a bit of a death knell in my mind, but I would certainly be interested in what cairns-smith have to say about this transition themselves.
Doubting Didymus is offline  
Old 12-05-2002, 01:20 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ecuador
Posts: 738
Post

All journalists should be drowned at birth. "Revolutionary New Theory" my aunt sally. Russell's been working on this forever. See <a href="http://www.gla.ac.uk/projects/originoflife/" target="_blank">U Glasgow Origin of Life</a> website. Unless he's come up with brand new information to bolster his idea (which didn't really come across in the article), it's just another hypothesis. I personally have always liked the submarine hotsprings idea (Corliss has a similar model), and Russell's model explains some of the things Corliss didn't touch. But to proclaim it "revolutionary" like no one ever thought about it before is plain hype.
Quetzal is offline  
Old 12-05-2002, 11:28 AM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Posts: 80
Post

There's also the surface metabolism theory of life's origins, put out by Gunter Wachtershauser. Has anyone researched that? He wrote an article about it in the december 1988 issue of Microbiological reviews. I read it, but I can't claim to understand it.
Neruda is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:09 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.