Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-30-2003, 05:43 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 66
|
Human Evolution Equilibrium?
Are homo sapiens in a sort of equilibrium as far as evolution is concerned? What I mean is, sometime in the distant future, will the human species evolve into another species? From my very limited understanding of the details of evolution, I understand that life evolved by natural selection, i.e. the mutations that weren't able to reproduce successfully didn't make it, the ones that did, did. But with medical technology and altruism, those born with severe defects can still live long lives, and thus the "weaker" ones don't die off immediately. Any thoughts?
-Roma |
04-30-2003, 06:39 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
|
For a start, its not just staying alive that's important, but breeding. I might have more to say here a little later.
|
04-30-2003, 06:41 PM | #3 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ca, Usa
Posts: 262
|
This can get rather indepth, but basically Natural selection has taken a back seat to civilization and technology. Natural selection is about adaptation, and currently we can adapt ourself quicker than Natural Selection can, so it has taken a back seat.
|
05-01-2003, 12:02 AM | #4 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,335
|
Quote:
Quote:
A gross oversimplification, I know, but, well.... |
||
05-01-2003, 12:57 AM | #5 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ca, Usa
Posts: 262
|
Just that since our technology and minds can help us adapt to our environment quickly. that Natural selection is happening, just on a slower proccess than it used to, because we can do some of the adaptations ourself.
As I mentioned this can get rather complicated, the complicated part is exactly how natural selection is working on us now. Since its a much more complicated issue than, wether an animal with more fur survives better in cold weather, so the animal gets more fur over the years, etc. Quote:
|
|
05-01-2003, 05:14 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ecuador
Posts: 738
|
Quote:
|
|
05-01-2003, 09:29 AM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dana Point, Ca, USA
Posts: 2,115
|
Human populations have a rather long generation time, and so human evolution is quite slow to begin with.
There is what I see as a common error in the idea that because of technology, humans are no longer subbject to natural selection. That is, that in the human "built" environment we have no selection pressures. In fact, the built enviornment has selection pressures as strong as the veldt or tundra. I suggest that you consider the highway fatalities as pressure to stay alert, and to posses quick reflexes. The prisons are selection pressure aginst anti-social behavior (however "normal" is defined locally- it still means "acting like the people around you"). There is also the hidden notion that there is a dicotomy between "human" and "natural." We may spend less time running from lions these days, but don't forget to watch out for that rogue SUV. |
05-01-2003, 10:42 AM | #8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fort Lauderale, FL
Posts: 5,390
|
Quote:
|
|
05-01-2003, 02:32 PM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 1,211
|
Obviously only the strict segregationists are going to be able to speciate then, in a few million years we will have speciated descendants of ultra-orthodox Jews, the Amish and white supremacists, I look forward to the day. Us miscegenated types better watch out for Homo novus klu kluxius.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|