FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Secular Community Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-08-2003, 09:46 PM   #701
pz
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 3,341
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Badfish
Did you remove "The bible is irrelevant " statement? Because that was going to be the basis for my explaination. Or whats going on I don't see it.

Anyway, the bible is relevant given the nature of CF. It is the very foundation on what CF was built on.

As for the rest of your post, it is considerable, but has nothing to do with CF rules.

See?
Please look around you. This is not christianforums. I really care nothing for the christianforums rules, except that they seem to be amusing instances of a lot of very stupid ideas.

Similarly, I don't give a damn about the bible. For exactly the same reason.

I was asking you for a rational explanation of your opinions. If you wish to fall back on the rather pathetic excuse that you are wedded to ancient dogma and can make no explanations without thumping a dead book, that's your choice.
pz is offline  
Old 04-08-2003, 09:46 PM   #702
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Death Valley, CA
Posts: 1,738
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by pz
Ah. So there are no opinions expressed on christianforums, since that would be a violation of the rules.

How...interesting.
Opinions can be good natured or bad natured, opinions can be flaming, opinions can be nice, opinions can be against the rules, opinions might not be against the rules, opinions, might be positive, opinions might be negative.

Opinions in itself has nothing to with asking the nature of one's opinion.

If you are serious, I will try to better define opinions and how they can be a violation of rules.

I think you are misunderstanding.
Badfish is offline  
Old 04-08-2003, 09:50 PM   #703
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Death Valley, CA
Posts: 1,738
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by pz
Please look around you. This is not christianforums. I really care nothing for the christianforums rules, except that they seem to be amusing instances of a lot of very stupid ideas.

Similarly, I don't give a damn about the bible. For exactly the same reason.

I was asking you for a rational explanation of your opinions. If you wish to fall back on the rather pathetic excuse that you are wedded to ancient dogma and can make no explanations without thumping a dead book, that's your choice.
No I'm not discussing my faith here.

And thats my point, this is not Christian forums, yet everyone comes here to complain about actions taken at CF.

Since a lot of the people involved in this thread are Christians, I will see which ones actually come forward to tell you that your statement about being wedded to a dogma is offensive.

I don't particularly find it offensive, I hear it at CF all the time, but I am curious if the Christians involved in this thread will defend their book or denounce it along with you.
Badfish is offline  
Old 04-08-2003, 09:53 PM   #704
pz
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 3,341
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Badfish
Opinions can be good natured or bad natured, opinions can be flaming, opinions can be nice, opinions can be against the rules, opinions might not be against the rules, opinions, might be positive, opinions might be negative.

Opinions in itself has nothing to with asking the nature of one's opinion.

If you are serious, I will try to better define opinions and how they can be a violation of rules.

I think you are misunderstanding.
You seem to have failed to notice that that was the very point wildernesse was making, with which you disagreed: holding opinions isn't the problem, it's how they are expressed. Well, here that's true, but it's apparently not so on christianforums, where only certain opinions are allowed to be expressed.

I'm not sure whether I'd call that intolerance or just intellectual cowardice, but either way, it ain't pretty.
pz is offline  
Old 04-08-2003, 09:58 PM   #705
pz
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 3,341
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Badfish
No I'm not discussing my faith here.

And thats my point, this is not Christian forums, yet everyone comes here to complain about actions taken at CF.

Since a lot of the people involved in this thread are Christians, I will see which ones actually come forward to tell you that your statement about being wedded to a dogma is offensive.

I don't particularly find it offensive, I hear it at CF all the time, but I am curious if the Christians involved in this thread will defend their book or denounce it along with you.
Why? Since you apparently lack [willingness] to defend or denounce or even discuss your faith, how meaningful is it if other christians similarly find it unworthy of comment?
pz is offline  
Old 04-08-2003, 10:58 PM   #706
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,578
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Badfish
No I'm not discussing my faith here.

And thats my point, this is not Christian forums, yet everyone comes here to complain about actions taken at CF.

Since a lot of the people involved in this thread are Christians, I will see which ones actually come forward to tell you that your statement about being wedded to a dogma is offensive.

I don't particularly find it offensive, I hear it at CF all the time, but I am curious if the Christians involved in this thread will defend their book or denounce it along with you.
The reason many people come here to gripe is because here there is something that CF lacks--freedom of expression. CF is not a transparent organization that allows dissent. Which would be fine if it weren't a *discussion* board.

I'm not offended by pz's comments. That's what he thinks. I disagree with him, but as long as he's not in my house rounding up my "dead books" and insisting that I give no attention to "ancient dogma" I think that he may think whatever he likes. Anyway, if the Word of God needs defending by little ole me, I have some serious problems with its greatness.

Many Christians are, in fact, wedded to dogma that they rarely think about or study to any degree. That's the very thing that stifles discussion and growth and leads to ostracizing people who question.

--tibac
wildernesse is offline  
Old 04-08-2003, 11:01 PM   #707
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Death Valley, CA
Posts: 1,738
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by pz
Why? Since you apparently lack the testicular fortitude to defend or denounce or even discuss your faith, how meaningful is it if other christians similarly find it unworthy of comment?
What do my testicals have to do with anything? Why is it, everytime I speak of god, somebody mentions my testicals?

They're not bad testicals, it's just that they cannot be compared to God or used to defend the position of Christianity.

Anyway, you should see that this isn't the thread to be defending one's faith, and besides you have already made your statement against Christianity, so debating and bringing such things into this thread would be off topic and be of no productivity.
Badfish is offline  
Old 04-08-2003, 11:04 PM   #708
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Death Valley, CA
Posts: 1,738
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by wildernesse
The reason many people come here to gripe is because here there is something that CF lacks--freedom of expression. CF is not a transparent organization that allows dissent. Which would be fine if it weren't a *discussion* board.

I'm not offended by pz's comments. That's what he thinks. I disagree with him, but as long as he's not in my house rounding up my "dead books" and insisting that I give no attention to "ancient dogma" I think that he may think whatever he likes. Anyway, if the Word of God needs defending by little ole me, I have some serious problems with its greatness.

Many Christians are, in fact, wedded to dogma that they rarely think about or study to any degree. That's the very thing that stifles discussion and growth and leads to ostracizing people who question.

--tibac
I think ostracising is an overstatement.

Actually the same could be said about people who tear down the bible and do their darndest to discredit it, then still contend the faith!

There really needs to be no questions, it is the truth or it isn't.
Badfish is offline  
Old 04-08-2003, 11:14 PM   #709
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Death Valley, CA
Posts: 1,738
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by wildernesse
The reason many people come here to gripe is because here there is something that CF lacks--freedom of expression. CF is not a transparent organization that allows dissent. Which would be fine if it weren't a *discussion* board.

--tibac
But see this forum and thread are open to the public and some people may be hurt or offended.

That's why I said earlier to just don't mind me.

I was merely defending CF's policies as I find them fair considering the mission statement and purpose of the board.

I see others believe they have been treated unfairly and brought it here, and there is no law against that. It's like a gathering place, where the outcasts can gather. I understand that.

I just wanted to say that CF isn't that bad, and if you follow the rules, it can be a good learning place, it's just that it is limited by it's very definition.

So be it. Gripe on.
Badfish is offline  
Old 04-08-2003, 11:37 PM   #710
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,578
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Badfish
I think ostracising is an overstatement.

Actually the same could be said about people who tear down the bible and do their darndest to discredit it, then still contend the faith!

There really needs to be no questions, it is the truth or it isn't.
How the heck do you know it is true if you don't question? Is it true? That's the most basic question of all!! After that comes: If it's true, what does that mean? And: Is there any new knowledge that changes my previous understanding?

I will not accept "_____" is true, just because. Even if it holds itself up to be the word of God.

And ostracizing is not an overstatement about the reaction I would get if I published my questions in the average Sunday School. Or even anonymously on CF! I'm afraid to speak to my family about my beliefs and what I really think because I know it would HURT them that I disagree with some of their beliefs/interpretations. I feel that questions or different ideas about traditional Christianity are unwelcome in most of the Bible Classes I have been a part of. I am not welcome to explore my faith fully within a large part of the Christian community.

Thankfully, I have found a Sunday school class that allows discussion and exploration--although I have a difficult time joining the discussion because of FEAR of rejection and judgement. Should a Christian have to feel this way within her own community? Think about that the next time you feel that Christianity's adherence to "truth" is liberating and loving.

--tibac
wildernesse is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:52 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.