Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-24-2002, 04:25 PM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Place
Posts: 285
|
Plato
Does anyone else take issue with Plato's work, Phaedo, regarding the immortality of the soul?
It seems that Plato(or Socrates, rather) contradicts himself when he says that what present in a body makes it alive is the soul, yet, he says that what makes something beautiful is the universal, "beauty" itself. By his arguement, shouldn't what makes a body alive, be the universal "being alive"(or something to that effect?). Am i making any sense? Reading Plato twists my brain. Any help on this would be appreciated. The passage i refer to is 105c. [ October 24, 2002: Message edited by: xeren ]</p> |
10-24-2002, 06:10 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 906
|
I believe that what Plato is saying is that "soul" is the actual mechanism that makes us alive. Much like the shinny new paint of a car is the mechanism which "makes" a car bautiful. Thus, we can say that the universal Beauty is acting through the paint to make the car beautiful. In the same way, the form of "being alive" could use the soul as its mechanism to make the body alive.
Better? |
10-24-2002, 06:26 PM | #3 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Place
Posts: 285
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
10-24-2002, 06:48 PM | #4 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
In the Christian tradition God is beauty and Lord God is truth, or, God is love and lord God is life to make love the effective force of life and life the effective cause of love. It just means that the soul is in charge of the body. The immortality of the soul just means that the blueprint for the human body is incarnate and that each generation has the ability to make minor changes to this. Because of these changes evolution is possible while beauty remains universal in nature for all the species to extract life from. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|