FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-28-2003, 06:03 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The land of chain smoking, bible thumping, holy ro
Posts: 1,248
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by hal9000
It's definitely a chicken or egg kind of thing. I think it's interesting that Sabine, Radorth, Gemma etc haven't responded to this thread. They and their friends would have to admit that they sheepishly follow an authoritarian dogma, and that’s not something most people would be proud to have to admit to.
No surprise for me, theists have no way out of this argument except to say that it's OK to be a slave/servant of God and his authoritarian dogma. They can't deny their belief in God is authoritarian in nature, so their best bet is to use the old "Gods ends justify his means" argument. You know, the same argument that Hitler, Stalin, and Mao among other adherents of authoritarian dogma, use.

Quote:
Originally posted by hal9000 I think another interesting question would be, is authoritarianism ever the best or even an acceptable course to follow? After all this place is kind of run along those lines, isn't it? That's not a complaint, just an observation.

Quote:
Originally posted by kctan
It's not the best nor the worst but still an acceptable course to follow. Remember, as long as it benefits the tribe/group as a whole, it stays.

It does have it's pros & cons but so does every other systems.
Though I'm a big believer in democracy, it does have its limitations. The majority can unjustly penalize the minority at times, much like we freethinkers are often socially penalized for our unbelief by theists who find us a threat to their very existence. At least here, we don't get murdered for our non-belief, as happens in some Islamic nations. I mean, if we are right, what have they been doing all this time, giving their time and money to the various religious for you know, "the usual." Hopefully some day this God nonsense will fade away from the collective memory of humanity, and we can get on with the business of evolving into whatever we are to become.

I remember an old saying that went something like, "The best form of Government is a benign Dictatorship." The problem is finding a benign dictator, isn't it?

David

"God and religion, the oldest scam in history, and it still sucks them in today, so free your mind, and your body will follow!"
David M. Payne is offline  
Old 01-29-2003, 01:37 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,047
Lightbulb Royalty

The major religions all developed from cultures where dictators were the norm. There's some similarities in the treatment of God. In the old testament, nobody questions whether God deserves your worship, just as they rarely ask whether the monarch deserved to rule.

So, in a sense, I think the authoritarian nature of these religions arose from the nature of the governing of the times.

But still, authoritarianism seems to be integral to religion. Can you even imagine a democratic religion? Democracy is antithetical to the idea of worship.



(On the other hand, maybe the model from the Terry Pratchett novels could count as a democratic religion. The Gods become more powerful the more people worship them. And that explains many Gods' egotistical demands for worship. But I have yet to meet someone who believes that's outside the realm of fiction.)
-RRH- is offline  
Old 01-29-2003, 03:33 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Texas
Posts: 707
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by David M. Payne
: Though I'm a big believer in democracy, it does have its limitations.

Democracy should be very limited! The founders lay out a republic for this country, but even that was limited by what they called the inalienable (unalienable) rights. In a true democracy these rights should be greatly expanded and more exactly defined. If they are not defined and defended the majority simply ends up voting largess for themselves from the government regardless of the rights of other people.

Quote:
The majority can unjustly penalize the minority at times, much like we freethinkers are often socially penalized for our unbelief by theists who find us a threat to their very existence. At least here, we don't get murdered for our non-belief, as happens in some Islamic nations. I mean, if we are right, what have they been doing all this time, giving their time and money to the various religious for you know, "the usual." Hopefully some day this God nonsense will fade away from the collective memory of humanity, and we can get on with the business of evolving into whatever we are to become.
Well, we may not be murdered outright, but the fundies wouldn't mind starving us to death, and it has been my experience that they will try to do so at every turn. I agree we will be better off without the "god in the head" syndrom that the fundies suffer, but I don't see them changing soon.

It doesn't seem that stable populations evolve much. What it seems to take to spur on evolution is a highly stressed population. So if evolution is what is wanted, maybe a good nuclear war is in order!

Quote:
I remember an old saying that went something like, "The best form of Government is a benign Dictatorship." The problem is finding a benign dictator, isn't it?

David
I like Jefferson's maxim much better: "That government governs best which governs least."
schu is offline  
Old 02-03-2003, 12:36 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The land of chain smoking, bible thumping, holy ro
Posts: 1,248
Default Re: Royalty

Quote:
Originally posted by RRH
The major religions all developed from cultures where dictators were the norm. There's some similarities in the treatment of God. In the old testament, nobody questions whether God deserves your worship, just as they rarely ask whether the monarch deserved to rule.

So, in a sense, I think the authoritarian nature of these religions arose from the nature of the governing of the times.

But still, authoritarianism seems to be integral to religion. Can you even imagine a democratic religion? Democracy is antithetical to the idea of worship...
Good point RPH. The Abrahamic religions must by their very nature be authoritarian in nature, just as any secular dictatorship is authoritarian in nature.

David

"God and religion, the oldest scam in history, and it still sucks them in today. So free your mind, and your body will follow!"
David M. Payne is offline  
Old 02-03-2003, 12:57 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The land of chain smoking, bible thumping, holy ro
Posts: 1,248
Default

Hi schu, long time no see.

Quote:
Originally posted by schu
Democracy should be very limited! The founders lay out a republic for this country, but even that was limited by what they called the inalienable (unalienable) rights. In a true democracy these rights should be greatly expanded and more exactly defined. If they are not defined and defended the majority simply ends up voting largess for themselves from the government regardless of the rights of other people… I like Jefferson's maxim much better: "That government governs best which governs least."
Yes, limited gov’t. is best, the argument is just how limited it should be.


Quote:
Originally posted by schu Well, we may not be murdered outright, but the fundies wouldn't mind starving us to death, and it has been my experience that they will try to do so at every turn. I agree we will be better off without the "god in the head" syndrome that the fundies suffer, but I don't see them changing soon.
We are a danger to the theist perspective, as we are able to function very well without any beliefs in their God/religion nonsense. Like all people who have bought into a scam, the more we point out that they are being sucked in, the more they resist the idea that they could be such suckers. I think BB put it best:
Quote:
Originally posted by BibleBelted:
My theory (which is probably not original with me) is that the more heavily invested (monetarily, time-wise or emotionally) someone gets with something, the less likely that someone is to admit that their investment is worthless.

No one likes to admit they've been suckered, so they deny it even to themselves, and keep pouring good money (and life) after bad.
Quote:
Originally posted by schu It doesn't seem that stable populations evolve much. What it seems to take to spur on evolution is a highly stressed population. So if evolution is what is wanted, maybe a good nuclear war is in order!
I hope this isn't the case, and I believe it isn't so prevalent these days, though stress is certainly a factor in most of our development as a species. I look at evolution as a very long-term prospect for humanity. If we can survive the wars that authoritarianism continually brings us, our future will be bright.

David

"God and religion, the oldest scam in history, and it still sucks them in today. So free your mind, and your body will follow!"
David M. Payne is offline  
Old 02-04-2003, 03:13 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: .nl
Posts: 822
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by hal9000
It's definitely a chicken or egg kind of thing.
The "chicken and egg" comparison is meaningless! The egg was laid by a proto-chicken - almast a chicken, but not quite...
VonEvilstein is offline  
Old 02-06-2003, 12:44 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The land of chain smoking, bible thumping, holy ro
Posts: 1,248
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by VonEvilstein
The "chicken and egg" comparison is meaningless! The egg was laid by a proto-chicken - almast a chicken, but not quite...
Hmm, I wonder if the Abrahamic God was created by a proto-God?

David

"God and religion, the oldest scam in history, and it still sucks them in today. So free your mind, and your body will follow!"
David M. Payne is offline  
Old 02-06-2003, 09:55 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,047
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by David M. Payne
Hmm, I wonder if the Abrahamic God was created by a proto-God?
No, it would have been created by proto-authoritarians. And the proto-authoritarian philosophy would have made by proto-theists. And proto-theism was created by proto-proto-authoritarians...
-RRH- is offline  
Old 02-06-2003, 11:13 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The land of chain smoking, bible thumping, holy ro
Posts: 1,248
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by RRH
No, it would have been created by proto-authoritarians. And the proto-authoritarian philosophy would have made by proto-theists. And proto-theism was created by proto-proto-authoritarians...
I think you're on to something here RRH, lets keep it just between us though, I wouldn't want the theists here to find out about this new discovery of yours.

David

"God and religion, the oldest scam in history, and it still sucks them in today. So free your mind, and your body will follow!"
David M. Payne is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:17 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.