FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-03-2003, 09:17 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default References on Acts Requested

There is a well-known tradition of defending the historicity of Acts on the basis of its accuracy concerning titles, geography, and other matters and its historical intent as revealed in the prologue (and possible eyewitness status). The literature is voluminous and will not be detailed here; quotes are often cited from William Ramsey, A. N. Sherwin-White, and F. F. Bruce among others.

There is also a well-known tradition of discrediting the historicity of the gospels, going back to D. F. Strauss and before. But a tradition of discrediting the historicity of the Acts of the Apostles is not known to me. What I would like to know is where to find some books or articles that seek to respond to the apologetics for Acts and/or that tend to undermine the factual nature of the stories in Acts and/or that present "liberal" commentary on the stories.

Please note that this is simply a request for references and does not mean that I have made any claims concerning the historicity or otherwise of Acts.

best,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 06-03-2003, 11:55 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Randal Helms Who Wrote the Gospels includes Acts. He finds literary and mythic themes in Acts that tend to discredit it as history.

Donald Harman Akenson's Saint Saul: A Skeleton Key to the Historical Jesus attacks the historicity of Acts; he claims that since there are discrepancies between the letters of Paul and the narrative of Acts, that Acts must be judged to be unreliable, on the theory that Paul's letters are first hand evidence.

There is this online essay: Problems with Luke as History, which tackles Luke-Acts together.
Toto is offline  
Old 06-04-2003, 12:00 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
Default

The Secweb library also has Sid Green's Hidden History in Acts of the Apostles.

Joel
Celsus is offline  
Old 06-04-2003, 12:24 AM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

I guess you could also call Eisenman a critic of the historicity of Acts, although he seems to give it more credit than you would expect.

I've also just come across this:

Luke's Story of Paul in Corinth:Fictional History in Acts 18
Toto is offline  
Old 06-04-2003, 02:42 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Doughty's article looks promising. Thanks.

I've come across a reference in Colin Hemer that "Zeller, who made the only thorough study of Acts by a member of the Tübingen School, stressed the Peter-Paul parallelism as a creation of the writer. This writer aims to justify the existence of a Gentile Christianity in the period 110-130, and therefore compromises the distinctiveness of Paul in order to conciliate the Jewish Christians." (The Book of Acts, p. 309) E. Zeller's book is titled Die Apostelgeschichte nach ihrem Inhalt und Ursprung kritisch untersucht (Stuttgart, 1854), translated as The Contents and Origin of the Acts of the Apostles, Critically Investigated, 2 vols., translated by Joseph Dare (London 1875-76). I couldn't find a used copy, but it is in some California university libraries.

Does anyone know of later studies in print that critically investigate the book of Acts?

thanks again,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 06-04-2003, 04:14 PM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

What about Eisenman's James the Brother of Jesus?

Richard Pervo has a book on Acts as a novel. Can't think of the name offhand. Hang on...
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 06-04-2003, 05:18 PM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Googling Zeller's book:

The Trial of the Gospel: An Apologetic Reading of Luke's Trial Narratives by Alexandru Neagoe

Introduction

The introduction is online, and contains a survey of the literature on Acts from the point of view of its apologetic purposes. It doesn't explicity discuss historical validity, but attributing an apologetic motive to any text tends to indicate it might not be historially accurate.

There's also a bibliography on Acts reseach here: http://cranfordville.com/ActsResearch.pdf
Toto is offline  
Old 06-04-2003, 05:33 PM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

vBB can't handle this URL:

http://www.bts.edu/trobisch/BookReviews/bookspra.htm#Pervo,%20Richard%20I:%20Profit%20with %20Delight;%20the%20Literary%20Genre%20of%20the%20 Acts%20of%20the%20Apostles%20(Philadelphia:%20Fort ress%20Press,%201987).%20[Jennie%20A.%20Barrington]

To find it, go to

BookReviews

search for Pervo

Review of Pervo's Profit with Delight; the Literary Genre of the Acts of the Apostles

Quote:
Pervo’s thesis concept is both daring and fairly complex. In the preface, he asserts that Acts is like the "popular" literature of its day in that it presents edifying (i.e., informing, improving, teaching) messages in an attractive and entertaining form (p. xi). Pervo’s extensive research has illuminated the adventure, intrigue, jealousy, humor, irony, rowdiness, pathos, and exotica in Acts and Apocryphal Acts. As such, he seeks to broaden the somewhat-colorless lense with which we have always read them. Yet in calling Acts a novel, Pervo does not intend to minimalize Luke as a theologian and evangelist. In fact, Pervo believes the entertaining nature of Acts—while rendering it less than accurate historically—furthers Luke’s vision better than a more literal work would have done.
Toto is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 01:21 AM   #9
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 318
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Peter Kirby
Doughty's article looks promising. Thanks.

I've come across a reference in Colin Hemer that "Zeller, who made the only thorough study of Acts by a member of the Tübingen School, stressed the Peter-Paul parallelism as a creation of the writer.
Absolutely!

Your thread has prompted me to have another go at Acts. Each time I do, something falls into place. I believe that I am cracking it.

No-one knows of a temple gate called Beautiful (Acts 3:3,9), so where is it?

Geoff
Geoff Hudson is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 06:31 PM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

The Westar Institute is putting on an Acts seminar this fall in Sonoma County:

http://www.westarinstitute.org/Event.../fall2003.html

Quote:
Saturday, October 18

Acts Seminar

9:00–10:30 a.m., 11–12:30 p.m., 2–3:30 p.m.
  • Richard Pervo, The Gates Have Been Closed: The Jews in Acts
  • Robert M. Price, Acts 14 and the Equinox of the Gods
  • Joseph Tyson, The Date of the Gospel of Luke
  • Richard Pervo, What Athens Has in Common with Jerusalem: The Speeches in Acts as Historical Record
  • Perry Kea, Robert M. Price, Dennis E. Smith, Chris Shea, Hal Taussig, Richard Pervo, and Joseph Tyson, Short papers on individual speeches in Acts
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:43 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.