FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-05-2002, 11:52 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 4,666
Post Looking for a forgotten scripture

I cannot remeber where, but I remeber a passage that says, essentually, "it's ok to lie, as long as it results in a conversion"

Strike any cords? I really don't want to spend the weekend re-reading both books just to find one forgotten reference...
Dark Jedi is offline  
Old 02-05-2002, 12:26 PM   #2
CX
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portlandish
Posts: 2,829
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Dark Jedi:
<strong>I cannot remeber where, but I remeber a passage that says, essentually, "it's ok to lie, as long as it results in a conversion"

Strike any cords? I really don't want to spend the weekend re-reading both books just to find one forgotten reference...</strong>
I beleive you are thinking of Paul's argument in Romans 3 that includes the verse:

( Romans 3:7 NIV)
Someone might argue, "If my falsehood enhances God's truthfulness and so increases his glory, why am I still condemned as
a sinner?"


This isn't saying that lying for the cause of god is okay. On the other hand one of the early Church fathers (it's either Irenaeus or Eusebius I forget which one) does seem to imply that it's okay to lie if it helpes the cause of Xianity. Strictly speaking though this idea is not biblical.
CX is offline  
Old 02-05-2002, 12:29 PM   #3
Honorary Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: West Coast
Posts: 5,714
Arrow

You might be thinking of:

Quote:
RO 3.7:
For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?
Taken out of context, it looks as if Paul is saying that the use of a lie is OK so long as it is for a godly purpose. Such is not the case, however. What Paul is allegedly saying is something like this:

Quote:
MacArthur's New Testament Commentary:
Self-righteous, self-satisfied Jews could not stand any attack on their supposed Abrahamic security and their man-made legalism. The apostle had learned from all these experiences that unbelieving Jews would always accuse him of teaching against God’s chosen people, against God’s promises to His people, and against God’s purity. It is therefore those three objections that he confronts in Romans 3:1-8.
Quote:
Adam Clarke's Commentary on the New Testament:
If the faithfulness of God in keeping his promise made to our fathers is, through our unfaithfulness, made far more glorious than it otherwise would have been, why should we then be blamed for that which must redound so much to the honor of God?
--Don--
-DM- is offline  
Old 02-05-2002, 12:37 PM   #4
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 254
Post

Quote:
Ro 3:7
For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?
This is one of those few times that quoting such a passage to imply that Paul thought it was OK to lie really IS taking things out of context. Why? It goes on to say...

Quote:
3:8
And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.

3:9
What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin;
This could be taken to mean that Paul indeed says it would be a sin to lie, even if "the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie..."

Note that I'm not a Christian, I'm just saying that when someone gives you a bible verse, ALWAYS read the surrounding context. You'll not only learn more about your position, but you'll save yourself from embarrasment (and may even be able to completely embarrass your opponent )
BLoggins02 is offline  
Old 02-05-2002, 12:40 PM   #5
Honorary Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: West Coast
Posts: 5,714
Arrow

Quote:
Originally posted by CowboyX:
... one of the early Church fathers (it's either Irenaeus or Eusebius I forget which one) does seem to imply that it's okay to lie if it helpes the cause of Xianity. Strictly speaking though this idea is not biblical.
For what it's worth -- which may not be too much given that it is difficult to confirm these quotes -- I offer these:

Oh Lord, I never spoke a true word in my life. I have always affirmed a lie as truth to all men, and no man contradicted me; instead they all gave credit to my works. - Hermas Early church father

Among those who seek power and gain from religion, there will never be wanting an inclination to forge and lie for it. -Lactantius 4th century Christian apologist

The great religious historian, Eusebius, ingenuously remarks that...he carefully omitted whatever tended to discredit the church, and that he piously magnified all that conduced to her glory. - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899) Attorney, orator

The gravest of all the ecclesiastical historians, Eusebius himself, ... confesses that he has related whatever might redound to the glory, and ... has suppressed all that would ... disgrace ... religion. - Edward Gibbon (1737-1794) English historian

On some occasions the bodies of the martyrs who had been devoured by wild beasts, upon the beasts being strangled, were found alive in their stomachs. - Eusebius (4th century) Bishop Christian ecclesiastical historian
-DM- is offline  
Old 02-05-2002, 03:07 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 4,666
Post

Thanks, folks. This was the one I was thinking of, and it is clearly not what I remebered. That keeps my foot out of my mouth, which is good!
Dark Jedi is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:01 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.