FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Secular Community Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 09:28 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-01-2003, 12:29 AM   #31
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: .nl
Posts: 822
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by DMB
In England there is something known as the greengrocers' apostrophe. (BTW does everyone understand the word "greengrocer"?)
All it is is a way of forming the plural of any noun by adding apostrophe-s, as in "potato's", "orange's", "pea's", and so on. Other people do it, of course, but since greengrocers are constantly changing their stock, they have to keep writing new notices with the prices.
This misuse of apostrophes is Of the Wyrm. It alone has been reason enough for me to take my business elsewhere.
VonEvilstein is offline  
Old 08-02-2003, 01:15 AM   #32
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Encino, CA
Posts: 806
Default

My head just Exploded
Darwin26 is offline  
Old 08-02-2003, 11:22 AM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
Default

How 'bouts everybody including Hillary Clinton uses "suspicious" instead of "suspect" (the adjective). As, "suspicious behaviour". I'd submit all the similar confusings that drive me nuts, but at this time of day I can't retrieve them...
abe smith is offline  
Old 08-02-2003, 09:27 PM   #34
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Torrance, California
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by VonEvilstein
I never could get the hang of semi-colons. I'll take your word for it.
By popular demand, here comes the semicolon (or semi-colon). This punctuation mark (;) is generally used to connect two main clauses that share a closely related idea, thereby forming a compound sentence from two simple sentences; consequently, a properly used semicolon indicates that the two connected statements should be considered closely related (more so than a period (.) does), so a writer will use it to concisely indicate that two things are related.

When used this way, you can always grammatically substitute the semicolon with a period and turn the sentence into two separate sentences. Your meaning will be the same, but the difference is that the two ideas are no longer considered to be as closely related as they were when they used the semicolon and were actually a single sentence.

If you're joining two main clauses that can stand alone as their own sentences, the second part of the sentence, the part after the semicolon, should not begin with a conjunction such as and, but, or, nor, for, yet, while, whereas, or so.
Example - Some forumers like to read about grammar; others like to complain about those that like to read about grammar.

You can, however, begin it with a conjunction if one or both clauses contains an internal comma. In this case, the semicolon acts as a kind of "supercomma."
Example - This forum has many moderators; but if we need more, we can always recruit some.

You may begin the second clause with a conjunctive adverb such as consequently, however, or nevertheless.
Example - Sometimes the more serious areas of this forum confuse me; consequently, I come to this one to unwind.

You should use a semicolon when the second clause is used to explain the first.
Example - Paypal donation is an important source of money; for example, generous forumers paid for last year's server fees through Paypal.

Another instance of the supercomma is when you are listing something normally comma-separated, but one or more of the individual elements requires a comma.
Example - The gang is made up of Buffy, the vampire slayer; Willow, the lesbian witch; and Xander, the everyman.




Layman's Explanation
The semicolon is the bastard child of the comma and the period. You can generally find a way to use it when you want a more forceful punctuation than a comma, but not as forceful as a period.

Laylayman's Explanation
Just use a period, you lazy fuckers.
Bag of Ass is offline  
Old 08-02-2003, 11:26 PM   #35
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,424
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Enlightened Lady
I'm sending a funny card to two, too serious people who need a good laugh.
Quote:
Originally posted by Enlightened Lady
Oops! My double post is the result of adding a comma to the second sentence in an attempt to make it more grammatically correct...

Eliminate the comma and hyphenate 'too' and 'serious.'
Cynical-Chick is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 03:46 AM   #36
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,532
Default

Here's one:

Everyone knows about too, to and two or they're, there and their. But there is a word in English that can be spelled FOUR ways, each of them being a legitimate word.

?????

RED DAVE
RED DAVE is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 05:27 AM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NZ
Posts: 7,895
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally posted by RED DAVE
Here's one:

Everyone knows about too, to and two or they're, there and their. But there is a word in English that can be spelled FOUR ways, each of them being a legitimate word.

?????

RED DAVE
wear, where, we're, ware!!!

I win!!
lunachick is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 05:29 AM   #38
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: .nl
Posts: 822
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by RED DAVE
Here's one:

Everyone knows about too, to and two or they're, there and their. But there is a word in English that can be spelled FOUR ways, each of them being a legitimate word.

?????

RED DAVE
I'll get back to you on this one. Best shot so far: bar, barr and barre... can anyone think of a fourth variation?
VonEvilstein is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 07:30 AM   #39
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Lincoln, AL
Posts: 1,048
Default

Sense, since, cents, scents?

Dirty Dog
MJones is offline  
Old 08-10-2003, 04:43 AM   #40
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,532
Default

From lunachick:

[QUOTE]wear, where, we're, ware!!!

I win!! [QUOTE]

Close, but no cigar.

Any more takers?

I promise to post the answer on Sunday, April 10.

RED DAVE
RED DAVE is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:39 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.