FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Secular Community Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 09:28 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-25-2003, 01:42 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,805
Question Their, there, they're and to, too, two.

Just out of curiosity, does anyone know if there are any grammatically correct sentences that have the three their's consecutively? Also are there any that have the three to's consecutively?
Cutter is offline  
Old 07-25-2003, 01:47 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 4,652
Default

Their parents over there, they're ugly!

Amen-Moses
Amen-Moses is offline  
Old 07-25-2003, 01:53 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,805
Default

Hmm, my post must not have been worded correctly. I was looking for the three words in a row, i.e. without any other words in between.
Cutter is offline  
Old 07-25-2003, 02:00 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Southern Ca.
Posts: 1,109
Default

Their "they're" there is used incorrectly.



I'm sending a funny card to two, too serious people who need a good laugh.
Enlighten Me is offline  
Old 07-25-2003, 02:04 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Sydney Australia and beyond the realms of Gehenna
Posts: 6,035
Default

look! there, they're their potatoes, but there, oh, over there they're their swedes.
ju'iblex is offline  
Old 07-25-2003, 02:04 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Southern Ca.
Posts: 1,109
Default

Oops! My double post is the result of adding a comma to the second sentence in an attempt to make it more grammatically correct...
Enlighten Me is offline  
Old 07-25-2003, 02:05 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,805
Smile

Thank you Enlightened Lady. Very interesting. I like the second sentence particularly. The first seems like a bit of a reach though. I'm not arguing that it's incorrect, I just can't see anyone using such a cumbersome sentence!

(Edited to add)

And thank you too, Ju'iblex.
Cutter is offline  
Old 07-25-2003, 02:30 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Southern Ca.
Posts: 1,109
Default

But imagine looking at a sign that several people have made on which they have written:
THEY'RE ARE NO ATHEISTS IN FOXHOLES!

You would say, in response to it: Their "they're" there is incorrect. (Of course, you'd criticize the sign's content as well
as its grammar...)
Enlighten Me is offline  
Old 07-25-2003, 02:46 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,805
Default

I understood the context of the sentence, but I (and I suspect most people) would say "That 'they're' is incorrect".
Cutter is offline  
Old 07-25-2003, 04:02 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: .nl
Posts: 822
Default

Well, I thought it was at twenty-to-two, too.

They're there, their friends haven't arrived yet.
VonEvilstein is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:39 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.