FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-24-2002, 07:19 PM   #21
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 278
Post

"I am a Christain and if you insult christianity you insult me."

I'm an agnostic, and you can insult agnosticism all you want without insulting me.
Seeker196 is offline  
Old 01-24-2002, 08:07 PM   #22
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 245
Post

Kosh,

Indeed, you are right that these aspects of the Bible could be used in such a way to manipulate and control. On the other hand, they could also be reflecting genuine truth.

Assume for the sake of argument that Christianity in its basic form is true -- so, the following propositions are true:

1) God exists and is infinite, omniscient, just, omnipotent, loving, etc.

2) Humans are sinful, finite, limited in knowledge & dependent upon God for their existence.

If these two propositions were true, it is quite logical to assume:

1) God's ways are not our ways.

2) There will be some who hear but not understand.

If you grant human sinfulness & God's sovereignty, both Biblical propositions make sense.

So, it really comes down to whether the initial propositions I put forth are true. If so, the Biblical statements aren't manipulative but rather reflect truth.

Regards,

- Scrutinizer
Scrutinizer is offline  
Old 01-24-2002, 10:03 PM   #23
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Boxing ring of HaShem, Jesus and Allah
Posts: 1,945
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally posted by Metacrock:
<strong>
To charge of Christianity with being a "cult" is the height of assingn stupidity! By defition it cannot be a cult because it is the thing that cults are imitating!
</strong>

Oh my! Whatever happened to Mithras, Dionysus, Osiris, Bacchus, Orpheus and all those other crucified virgin-born saviours?

(I expect Meta to "tekton" me now...)

Quote:
<strong>
It doesn't have any of the ear marks of cults, and no sociologist who studies culs has ever tried to say that it is one (and I know that for a fact because I was a sociology major and I studied in the class of one of the major cult watching sociologists). This is just dumb. Get it? Just dumb.</strong>
Christianity (and Islam too) has grown too large to be counted as a cult. Religions are cults grown to formality, just as languages are dialects waving a national flag (to quote Anthony Burgess' A Mouthful Of Air). Furthermore, anyone teaching Christianity as a cult is risking his career.

The earmarks of cults are present in Christianity if you just leave off your bias: infallible leader, salvation only through him, manipulation by carrot and stick, binary separation between factions (God/Satan, good/evil, Christianity/All Other Religions, Saved/Unsaved, Believers/Unbelievers), low view of the "outside group" (the exhortation to avoid being yoked with unbelievers - if that's not a sign of a cult then I don't know what is).

Christianity is a cult - the cult of Jesus, Paul &c. The difference between Christianity and Falun Gong is that Christianity is much more successful. Christianity is a cult become as dominant as Microsoft.
emotional is offline  
Old 01-24-2002, 11:14 PM   #24
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 245
Post

"Cult" has a negative feel to it, "religion" doesn't really. Whether or not Christianity is a cult is just a semantic game.

If Christianity is defined as a cult, then so be it. I'd just have to alter the negative "feeling" I get when I hear the word "cult"!

Regards,

- Scrutinizer
Scrutinizer is offline  
Old 01-25-2002, 02:04 AM   #25
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by dwp666:
<strong>The book of Acts certainly brings killer cults to mind. The Bible clearly describes how the early Christians lived together in a communal fashion, selling their goods and sharing their belongings with the group (Acts 2:43-46, 4:32-35). Acts chapter five says that Saphira convinced her husband to retain some of the money they made from selling their belongings and only give some of it to the apostles. After Peter confronted the couple they both fell down dead. ...</strong>
In effect, they had not only practiced socialism, they had also practiced Stalinism.

I'm drawing an analogy with the forcible collectivization of farms that Stalin had ordered; those who were reluctant to go along were sent to gulags -- or worse.
lpetrich is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:21 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.