Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-10-2003, 02:11 AM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Luleå, Sweden.
Posts: 354
|
Natural alternatives to steroids?
Got a wee bit silly question here. I spend a lot of time at the local gym (5-6 days/week). Does wonders for my bloodsugar levels (have type-1 diabetes since 22-23 yrs back) that does.
I've seen a lot of, well, talk about "natural alternatives to anabolic steroids/pro-hormones", one of those products are called IsoStak and claims to work wonders. Is there any glimmer of truth to these claims? Are there any scientific studies done to test these kinds of products? After all, when something looks to good to be true, it often isn't true and my natural curiosity have gotten the better of me, and what better place to find out the truth than at IIDB. On the same note. HGHs. Not a day pass by without a spam on HGHs coming into my mailbox.*mutter...kill the spammers, kill the spammers...*, claiming all sorts of wonderful effects and citing such scientific and reliabel sources as Oprah. So...any scientific studies done on this area? |
04-10-2003, 04:16 AM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cleveland, OH, USA
Folding@Home Godless Team
Posts: 6,211
|
Well, one place to start is QuackWatch where I did a search on Isostak without success so I then did a generic steroid seach. There might be something in the results that might help.
HTH |
04-10-2003, 06:25 AM | #3 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Luleå, Sweden.
Posts: 354
|
Quote:
|
|
04-10-2003, 06:28 AM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 1,840
|
"All natural" usually means "totally untested." Most of the anabolic supplements that have been tested in the past have offered very little if any benefit in terms of muscle mass or resistance training. I looked on PubMed for papers on the ingredients in IsoStak, which are mostly just soy isoflavones, and found little evidence that they will produce any gains in muscle mass in humans, much less that they will produce the types of gains you'd see with anabolic steroids. This article on BodyBuilding.com takes a negative view of soy isoflavones.
Patrick |
04-10-2003, 08:19 AM | #5 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 183
|
There are no health food shop alternatives to steroids.
Sustanon 250 injected twice monthly for three months will increase your muscle mass by 5 to 10 kg by the end of that same three months if you work out effectively 5-6 days a week. If you are a bit of an asshole, and especially if you are a drinker you greatly increase the chances of being arrested over the three month period. Otherwise the only side effect is likely to be increased glucose tolerance. |
04-10-2003, 08:35 AM | #6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 1,840
|
According to this article, potential side effects of Sustanon 250 include far more than simply increased glucose tolerance:
Quote:
|
|
04-10-2003, 09:08 AM | #7 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 183
|
You are unlikely to experience any negative effects from Sustanon 250 injected 6 times over a three month period.
|
04-10-2003, 11:59 AM | #8 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Luleå, Sweden.
Posts: 354
|
Quote:
As I said, when something sounds a bit too good to be true, it prolly isn't... Especially when it says how scientifically proven their product is, but can not give a single reference to any studies... But, in any case, thanks for all the answers. |
|
04-11-2003, 08:14 AM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,335
|
If I may wade in with my two cents worth (and I suspect my position may be self-evident)...
Any supplement, whether nutritional or ergogenic is unnecessary outside of certain clinical situations or for the highest extremes of elite athletes. Claims made by the manufacturer do not need to be validated by the FDA. Therefore, they are free to say just about anything they want to on their product labels. Scientific claims made for these products are rarely based on methodologically sound clinical trials, or even on human subjects. The "results" they infer are extrapolated from animal studies, or are simply made up to make the product more attractive to consumers. Caveat Emptor is certainly the flavour of the day WRT ergogenic aids. Unless reported in proven scientific literature, the claimants are the modern-day equivalent ot snake-oil salesmen. |
04-12-2003, 03:58 AM | #10 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hayward, CA, USA
Posts: 1,675
|
'roid rage
There's a big deal made about anabolic steroids causing bad temper, but compared to corticosteroids it doesn't seem to be nearly as bad. Corticosteroids are used as anti-inflammitories to treat asthma, autoimmune diseases, and certain types of pediatric cancers. Sleeplessness, severe mood swings, and even psychosis can occur. However, since these steroids are usually not abused, one doesn't hear about the 'roid rage caused by them.
I just grinned, because I've heard people claim that only anabolic steroids can cause 'roid rage. Oh, how wrong they are. They've just never had a 1000mg IV push of methylprednisolone before. Of course, I was so happy I could breathe again and didn't feel like my ribs were going to collapse that I fell asleep. And the fact that I could walk the next day also helped keep me from being totally homicidal from the steroids. But it ended up being an abject lesson in the endocrinology of the fight/flight mechanism. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|